Inner City Press





In Other Media-eg New Statesman, AJE, FP, Georgia, NYTAzerbaijan, CSM Click here to contact us     .



These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis
,



Share |   

Follow on TWITTER

Home -

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis

CONTRIBUTE

(FP Twitterati 100, 2013)

ICP on YouTube

More: InnerCityPro

BloggingHeads.tv
Sept 24, 2013

UN: Sri Lanka

VoA: NYCLU

FOIA Finds  

Google, Asked at UN About Censorship, Moved to Censor the Questioner, Sources Say, Blaming UN - Update - Editorial

Support this work by buying this book

Click on cover for secure site orders

also includes "Toxic Credit in the Global Inner City"
 

 

 


Community
Reinvestment

Bank Beat

Freedom of Information
 

How to Contact Us



After Loans at 79% Interest New Yorker Sues NJ Lender For Usury As Deposition by FedEx Mulled

By Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon
BBC - Guardian UK - Honduras - The Source

SDNY COURTHOUSE, July 6 – Alleging usurious loans under New York State law, Jayaveerapandian Shunmugavel has sued Selvam Balasubramaniam, calling him a "ruthless loan shark."  

On July 6, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge P. Kevin Castel held a proceeding. Inner City Press covered it. 

   Discovery was discussed, including remote deposition at which Judge Castel proposed that documents sent by FedEx would be kept sealed until the questioning itself.

One of the lawyers laughed, saying he had recently faced an adversary who demanded to see such documents three days before the deposition Q&A. He asked if the SDNY courthouse would be used to conduct depositions.

  That might happen in the New York State courthouses, Judge Castel replied, but not here.

   Many of the issues in the case come down to choice of law: the interest rates cited, 70%, are usury in New York but perhaps not elsewhere.

 So Judge Castel asked for filings on this issue, while encouraging the parties to try to settle. 

 He proposed referring the matter to the mediation program, saying he would so order it and consider reversing that if he heard again from the parties.

The case is Shunmugavel v. Balasubramaniam, 20-cv-957 (Castel)

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA

Mail: Box 20047, Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540



Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2019 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com for