In
SDNY Pakistani Extradited From
Nigeria Pled Guilty On Heroin
Now Sentencing Qs
By Matthew
Russell Lee, @SDNYLIVE
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
April 22 – A Pakistani man
accused of trying to import
heroin into the US and just
extradited from Nigeria was
arraigned on April 29, 2019 in
the U.S.
District Court
for the
Southern
District of
New York
Magistrate's
courtroom,
presided over
for the week
by Magistrate
Judge Kevin
Nathaniel Fox.
Inner City
Press was
present in
person and
reported on
the
presentment,
which was not
otherwise
announced.
In
the courtroom
that day,
along with
Inner City
Press as the
only media,
were several
heavily
bearded US
agents. This
shacked
defendant
Muhammad
Khalid Khan,
with the same
genial Pashto
interpreter as
in the a
recent SDNY
Taliban case
covered by
Inner City
Press, pled
not guilty.
His Federal
Defenders
lawyer did not
in this
proceeding
seek bail, and
later
conferred with
the also FD
lawyer in the
Taliban case.
Now more than
a year later,
this on
September 7:
"Dear Judge
Broderick: I
represent
Muhammad
Khalid Khan in
the above
referenced
matter. Mr.
Khan’s case is
currently on
the Court’s
calendar for
September 15,
2020. With the
consent of the
government, it
is
respectfully
requested that
the case be
put over for a
two-week
period. It is
anticipated
that Mr. Khan
will enter a
plea of guilty
at the next
appearance,
however,
counsel needs
additional
time to make
certain that
he understands
the plea offer
extended by
the
government. I
am advised by
chambers that
September 29,
2020, is a
convenient
date for the
Court.
On September
24, Khan's
lawyer wrote
in to ask for
another four
weeks, citing
an eye
infection and
COVID
quarantine
requirements.
On November
10, Judge
Broderick held
a lengthy
change of plea
proceeding,
with
consecutive
interpretation.
Khan pled
guilty to
importing
heroin to the
U and to money
laundering. He
asked a number
of question,
for example on
what papers
Judge
Broderick was
asking if he'd
read. Judge
Broderick
patiently
answered, and
accepted the
plea.
On
February 8,
two weeks
before the
February 23
sentencing,
Khan's counsel
has written in
for another
four to six
week delay,
citing COVID
and the
Pre-Sentencing
Report.
Now
on the eve of
sentencing,
Judge
Broderick as
is his way has
published his
questions:
"ORDERED that
the parties
shall provide
the following
requested
documents
prior to
sentencing and
shall be
prepared to
discuss/answer
the following
topics and
questions
either at
sentencing or
prior to
sentencing: 1.
The Government
shall provide
a copy of any
report and/or
notes taken
during
Defendant’s
safety valve
proffer. 2. On
page 5 of the
defense
submission it
states “Since
his
incarceration,
Mr. Khan’s
mother has
suffered a
stroke and her
health is
declining
rapidly.” What
is the basis
for this
statement? Is
there any
other location
in the defense
submission
with the
stroke is
discussed?
Do
Defendant’s
medical
records
support the
assertion that
medical
professionals
proscribed
medication for
Defendant that
were not
filled by the
Bureau of
Prisons? If
so, how many
times did this
occur? 4. Does
Defendant
and/or his
family own
Bismillah
& Co
(“B&C”)?
a.
What was the
gross and net
annual revenue
of B&C in
2020? b. Does
Defendant
and/or his
family operate
the branches
of B&C? c.
What was
Defendant’s
salary in 2019
from the work
he did at
B&C?. 5.
What is the
support for
the assertion
that Defendant
lied during
the instant
offense about
his ability to
obtain and
transport
narcotics
and/or his
ability to
launder money?
6. What is the
evidence that
Defendant was
not lying
during the
instant
offense? 7.
Does the
Government
have
Defendant’s
passport? a.
What countries
does the
passport
indicate
Defendant
traveled to
between 2017
and 2019? b.
What countries
does the
passport
indicate
Defendant
traveled to
prior to 2017?
8. Did the
Government
seize
Defendant’s
cell phone? a.
Did the
Government
obtain
Defendant’s
cell phone
records? b.
Did the
Government
search the
contents of
Defendant’s
cell phone? If
so, was there
any proof of
his narcotics
trafficking
and/or his
money
laundering on
his cell
phone? 9.
During the
instant
offense
Defendant
claimed to
have access to
150 kilograms
of “opium” for
sale in
Toronto,
Canada.
a.
What is the
proof that
this was a
true
statement? b.
Is there any
information
that confirms
that Defendant
had access to
150 kilograms
of “opium” in
Canada? 10. In
the Summer of
2018 Defendant
was arrested
in Nigeria and
eventually
extradited to
the United
States. a. At
the time
Defendant was
arrested in
Nigeria was he
offered the
opportunity to
cooperate? b.
According to
the
Government’s
sentencing
submission, on
June 29, 2018,
Defendant told
UC-2 that he
had 200
kilograms of
heroin in a
country in
East Africa.
Does the
Government
have any
evidence that
confirms
Defendant’s
assertion?
Does the
Government
have any
information
concerning
where in East
Africa the 200
kilograms of
heroin were
located? 11.
On page 5 of
the
Government’s
submission the
Government
discusses
Defendant’s
proffer
sessions with
the
Government. To
the extent the
Government is
permitted to
comment on
Defendant’s
proffer
sessions, a.
Did the
Government
believe
Defendant’s
statements
during the
proffer
sessions? b.
Did the
Government
believe
Defendant was
minimizing his
involvement in
narcotics
trafficking?
c. Did the
Government
believe
Defendant was
minimizing his
involvement
with money
laundering?
d.
The Government
states that
“Unfortunately,
the Government
and the DEA
assessed that
the
information
Khan provided
was limited,
and
insufficiently
specific and
actionable to
provide
substantial
assistance in
the
foreseeable
future.” What
does
“insufficiently
specific and
actionable”
mean?" Inner
City Press
will continue
to report on
this case.
The
case is US v.
Khan,
18-cr-830
(Broderick).
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
Box 20047, Dag Hammarskjold
Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2019 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|