| Bard College
Is Sued for Discriminating & Dean
Buying Drugs from Students, Now Unsealing
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon Maxwell
Book
BBC -
Honduras
- CIA
Trial Book - NY
Mag
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
Sept 12 – Bard College has
been sued for racial
discrimination, in a
semi-sealed complaint which
says its "nearly all-white
Annandale campus [i]s a
scenario from the racial
horror film, 'Get out.'"
Complaint on Patreon here.
Jane Doe
the plaintiff is described as
a gay woman of color hired by
Bard in 2008. which then
refused to protect her against
a violent student, "conducting
a sham investigation against
her that was itself an act of
racial harassment, and
ultimately terminating her
employment."
On August 29 in
the case, assigned to U.S.
District Court for the
Southern District of New York
Judge Cathy Seibel, a motion
for Jane Doe to proceed under
a pseudonym.
On September 2,
the parties agreed on a
briefing schedule: Bard to
oppose by September 27, reply
on October 11. But Bard's
letter is still not in the
docket - they must agree, or
filing dueling redactions by
September 7. Watch this site.
The
complaint quotes Bard Dean
Michele Dominy telling Doe
that faculty "thought she was
qualified but 'arrogant.'" It
says Associate Dean of Student
T.B., an alum, "sexually
harassed and bought drugs from
students."
Doe quotes Chinua
Achebe he left Bard because he
could not stay at a place that
treated his wife that way -
calling her "crazy" and "off
her rocker." My old school,
indeed.
On September 12
Judge Seibel ordered that the
entire letter of August 30 be
docketed: "ORDER re: [18] Memo
Endorsement: The parties have
agreed that Defendants 8/30/22
letter (to which ECF No. 14
responds) should be docketed,
except Plaintiff wants one
sentence redacted and
Defendant objects. I find no
grounds to redact the disputed
sentence. It summarizes
Defendants defense in this
case that it had
non-discriminatory reasons for
its employment actions
regarding Plaintiff. It or
similar arguments will no
doubt be repeated throughout
the litigation. Whether or not
it is true is essentially what
the case will be about. There
is no point in hiding it. To
the extent Plaintiff is
concerned that the sentence
will be misconstrued as
suggesting sexual impropriety,
I can only say that any such
inference is unsupported by
the language used. (HEREBY
ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)
(Text Only Order)." Watch this
site.
The case is Doe
v. Bard College, 22-cv-7258
(Seibel)
***
Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a
month helps keep us going and grants you
access to exclusive bonus material on our
Patreon page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2022 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
|
,
