Cellino and Barnes Sue For
Client Whose Employment Is Unknown Residual
Pain of Break Up
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Exclusive video
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
June 25 – Cellino &
Barnes, Personal Injury
Attorneys, filed a Federal
case on April 18, 2019 against
Columbia University. But when
the case was called on June 25
in the
U.S. District
Court for the
Southern
District of
New York
courtroom of Judge
Naomi Reice
Buchwald,
present were
only two
attorneys, the
Judge and
Inner City
Press.
Judge Buchwald
asked
plaintiff
Douglas
Welch's
Cellino &
Barnes
personal
injury
attorney what
her client's
job is. She
did not know.
Judge Buchwald
said to bring
such
information
the next time
- if there is
a next time.
For now there
are deadlines
for letters to
the court:
August 26,
October 28,
and by the end
of the year.
By then, where
will Cellino
& Barnes,
or their post
break up bete
noir
Cellino &
Cellino, be?
Another SDNY
case, another SDNY judge, a
week before: it started with a
fracture femur in a slip and
fall accident on the sidewalk
in front of 467 Bushwick
Avenue in Brooklyn on July 2,
2015 - and led to the
courtroom of Judge
Jed Rakoff.
Great
American
Insurance Company of
Cincinnati is
suing broker
Joseph Zelik of
2405 Avenue U
in Brooklyn
about umbrella
and
excess
liability
coverage. Both
sides
wanted nothing
to happen in
the case for
the next
thirty days.
But
they do no
know Judge
Rakoff.
He
denied the
request, and said
that the
parties'
proposed
dates for
summary judgment
motions would
come after the
trial - "unique in
the annals of
jurisprudence,"
he said.
Judge
Rakoff
moved each
proposed date
up,
emphasizing
that
interrogatories
are limited under local
rules (as he
would repeat,
accompanied
by the physical
tearing up of
non-conforming
interrogatories,
in a WOW Media
case a few
minutes later),
and setting it down
for trial on
November 18.
The final
pre-trial
conference
will be on
October 31 -
"in honor of Haloween,"
Judge Rakoff
said. The case is Great
American
Insurance
Company v.
Joseph Zelik,
19-cv-1805 (Rakoff).
Next case: It was
just a photograph of a salted
caramel apple pie. But when
Hudson Yards-based WOW Media
Products used it, and
photograph Byron Smith sued in
the SDNY
it got
assigned to
Judge Rakoff. Torn up
interrogatories
ensued.
On June 17
in the
initial pre-trial
conference to
agree on a
case
management
plan, Judge
Rakoff first
chided WOW Media's
lawyer for
proposing too
much time to
begin
interrogatories
or written
questions. He
replied
that the
plaintiff's
lawyer had
submitted
interrogatories
that went
beyond Local
Rule 33.3a which
Judge Rakoff
had cited.
"Let me
see then," Judge
Rakoff said. The defense
lawyer David
S. Gold of
Cole Schotz PC
of Hackensack,
New Jersey,
after
saying "May I
approach"
handed them up.
"These
are grossly in
excess,"
Judge Rakoff
said, again citing
the Local Rule.
And then he tore
up the paper,
saying "They are
stricken." He
added that
he does not
expect plaintiff's
counsel Richard
Liebowitz of
Valley Stream, New York, to
do it again.
Nor do we - at
least not
before Judge
Rakoff. It began
with
just a photo
of a salted caramel apple pie, published
without
payment on
PureWow.com
as point 22 of
"Things
to Eat In
Brooklyn: Salted
Caramel Apple Pie
at Four &
Twenty Blackbirds."
The
case is Smith
v. Wow Media
Products,
19-cv-4119
(Rakoff).
Back in May
before Judge Rakoff a Chinese
firm claiming patent to
so-called "soft SIM"
technology presented
a witness
who couldn't
remember what
he'd said
during his
deposition,
and insisted
he owned the
patent to the
whole concept,
the whole
system, a SIM
without a hard
SIM card, a
future of
roaming like the
Chinese Navy
in the South
China Sea.
Judge
Rakoff
repeatedly had
to tell the
witness to
answer yes or
no and not
just nod; even
in the deposition
transcript
read back he
had said "hmm hmm."
His colleagues
followed it
intently, one of
them in the
gallery with
his laptop
open. Had it
been stripped of
its network
card? Or was
this soft too?
Inner
City Press
may
have more on
this.
Hours later on May 2 when
Malik Gray came to be
sentenced for his role in a
scheme that defrauded and
stole from drivers for Uber
and Lyft in The Bronx, in the
back of the SDNY courtroom
of Judge Jed
Rakoff were
two U.S.
Marshals. They
had been
alerted to be
ready in case
Judge Rakoff
ordered Gray
immediately
remanded.
Gray has been
under house
detention for
more than 13
months, and
Judge Rakoff
zeroed in on
times he has
gone out
without
excuse. The
longest one
cited was on
April 18, from
4:31 pm to
7:36 pm.
Gray's lawyer
Arnold J.
Levine was
ready: this
had been to
attend Gray's
son's birthday
party at Chuck
e Cheese,
something
Judge Rakoff
himself had
signed off on.
Already remand
seemed less
likely.
Another
unauthorized
stepping out
of the house
was to speak
to his son's
mother. Judge
Rakoff asked
why she
couldn't come
into the
house. The
family doesn't
want her to
come in,
Levine
explained,
their
inter-personal
communication
inside are not
what they
could be.
Judge Rakoff,
who slyly
quoted his
article in the
New York
Review of
Books about
eye witness
identification
at a March 19
proceeding in
the case, also
asked about
Gray having
impregnated
two different
women, and
being left by
the second of
them when she
found him
texting with a
third woman.
Levine quoted
divorce
statistics -
Rakoff shot
back that Gray
has short
circuited the
whole marry
and divorce
merry go round
- and then
said that
staying
together for
the kids is
not the best
approach.
Judge Rakoff
said that Gray
was cheating,
or that the
mother of his
newborn son
thought that
he was
cheating, "not
without
reason." He
acknowledged
that he did
not have
enough basis
to form a
conclusion,
and turned to
his other
sentences in
the wider ride
share rip off
case. He
sentenced
George Joseph
to 42 months
and Devon
Williams to 36
months. Levine
wanted 24
months for
Gray and
started
arguing under
the sentencing
guidelines.
Judge Rakoff
told him that
he did not
consider
those, but
wanted to hear
about relative
culpability
and any
disparities in
sentencing.
The wider case
is USA v.
Pina,
et al.,
18-cr-00179
(JSR).
Ultimately
Judge Rakoff
sentenced Gray
to 36 months,
the same as
Devon
Williams, and
three years of
Supervised
Relief. They
owe $441,775
in
restitution.
But Gray was
not remanded,
the Marshals
left into
their corridor
before Rakoff
set June 25
for Gray to
report to
wherever he is
assigned. He
has requested
near
Bridgeport,
Connecticut to
be near his
mother. He
said he won't
target Uber
and Lyft
drivers in the
future because
he wouldn't
want it done
to him, that
he'd done it
in order to
feed his
children. Call
it the Chuck e
Cheese
defense.
Inner
City Press and
@SDNYLIVE
are on the
case(s)....
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
Box 20047, Dag Hammarskjold
Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2019 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|