In
SDNY Education Department Says
Can Only Release 500 Pages A
Month Under FOIA Why Not
Online
By Matthew
Russell Lee
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
April 16 – The US Department
of Education is being sued
under the Freedom of
Information Act to disclose
information about its changing
policies on school safety
after the Parkland school
shooting. It came up on April
16 before US
District Court
for the
Southern
District of
New York
Magistrate
Judge James L.
Cott, who
urged the
Department to
confer out in
his jury room
off the
record, under
the threat of
being ordered
in the summer
to increase
its document
release from
500 pages a
month to 1000.
Why not just
put the
documents
online? We'll
have more,
much more, on
FOIA in the
SDNY. For
one example: the Bangladeshi
Central Bank which was hacked
for $81 million in February
2016, on January 31 sued in
the SDNY. Now the first
pre-trial conference in the
case has been set, for 2 April
2019 before SDNY Judge Lorna
G. Schofield. Inner City Press
will be there.
To
the Federal
Reserve, Inner
City Press
requested
records
relating to
the Fed's role
with response
officially due
in 20 working
days. But now
this from the
Federal
Reserve:
"Re:
Freedom of
Information
Act Request
No.
F-2019-00095
Dear Mr.
Lee,
On February
19, 2019, the
Board of
Governors
(“Board”)
received your
electronic
message dated
February 17,
pursuant to
the Freedom of
Information
Act (“FOIA”),
5 U.S.C. §
552, for
records
regarding the
Federal
Reserve
System's
[role]
including the
FRBNY's role
in what is
known as the
Bangladesh
Bank hack or
cyber heist
and assistance
provided to
Bangladesh
Bank and
investigative
authorities
since the
heist,
including but
limited to in
connection
with the SDNY
case
Bangladesh
Bank v Rizal
Commercial
Banking Corp
et al, U.S.
District
Court,
Southern
District of
New York, No.
19-00983.
Pursuant to
section
(a)(6)(B)(i)
of the FOIA,
we are
extending the
period for our
response until
April 2, 2019,
in order to
consult with
two or more
components of
the Board
having a
substantial
interest in
the
determination
of the
request.
If a
determination
can be made
before April
2, 2019, we
will respond
to you
promptly. It
is our policy
to process
FOIA requests
as quickly as
possible while
ensuring that
we disclose
the requested
information to
the fullest
extent of the
law." And
April 2 is the
day of the
SDNY hearing.
We'll have
more on this.
In Dhaka, the
Criminal Investigation
Department which failed to
submit its probe report into
the heist on time has now been
ordered by Metropolitan
Magistrate
Sadbir Yasir
Ahsan
Chowdhury to
do so by March 13 in
Bangladesh Bank cyber heist
case.
In the U.S.
District Court for Central
California, the unsealed
criminal complaint against
Park Jin Hyuk lists four email
addresses involved in
spear-phishing Bangladesh Bank
and among others an unnamed
"African Bank;" one of these
addresses is said to also have
communicated with an
individual in Australia about
importing commodities to North
Korea in violations of UN
sanctions.
In the SDNY, the
case is Bangladesh Bank v
Rizal Commercial Banking Corp
et al, U.S. District Court,
Southern District of New York,
No. 19-00983. On February 3 in
Dhaka Bangladesh Bank's
lawyer Ajmalul
Hossain
said it could take three years
to recover the money. The
Bank's deputy governor Abu
Hena Razee Hasan said those
being accused -- in the civil
not criminal suit -- include
three Chinese nationals.
Ajmalul Hossain said the Bank
is seeking its hacked million
plus interest and its expenses
in the case. He said US
Federal Reserve will extend
its full support and that
SWIFT, the international money
transfer network, also assured
of providing all the necessary
cooperation in recovering the
hacked money. The
Philippines returned $14.54
million in November 2016, so
$66.46 million has yet to be
retrieved. Now defendant RCBC
Bank of the Philippines has
hired the Quinn Emanuel law
firm to defend it, and it
already fighting back in
words. RCBC’s lead counsel on
the SDNY case, Tai-Heng Cheng,
said: “This is nothing
more than a thinly veiled PR
campaign disguised as a
lawsuit. Based on what we have
heard this suit is completely
baseless. If the Bank of
Bangladesh was serious about
recovering the money, they
would have pursued their
claims three years ago and not
wait until days before the
statute of limitations. Not
only are the allegations
false, they don’t have the
right to file here since none
of the defendants are in the
US." But it seems the funds
were transferred to and
through the Federal Reserve
Bank of New York. And as Inner
City Press reported in the US
v. Patrick Ho case last year,
the wiring of funds through
New York can confer
jurisdiction. Inner City Press
will be covering this case.
The first paragraph of the 103
page complaint reads, "This
litigation involves a massive,
multi-year conspiracy to carry
out one of the largest banks
heists in modern history right
here in New York City. On
February 4, 2016, thieves
reached into a bank account at
the Federal Reserve Bank of
New York (“New York Fed”) and
stole approximately $101
million (out of the nearly $1
billion they attempted to
steal). The bank account was
held for the benefit of
Bangladesh Bank, which is
Bangladesh’s Central Bank.
Bangladesh Bank has had a
45-year banking relationship
under which it has placed its
international reserves with
the New York Fed. The New York
Fed is a critical component of
the United States’ central
banking system and its link to
the international financial
system." Bangladesh's lawyers
on the case are "COZEN
O’CONNOR John J. Sullivan,
Esq. Jesse Loffler, Esq.
Yehudah Gordon, Esq." We'll
have more on this.
Debaprasad
Debnath, a general manager at
the central bank’s Financial
Intelligence Unit, Joint
Director Mohammad Abdur Rab
and Account and Budgeting
Department General Manager
Zakir Hossain all left Dhaka
to head to New York, for the
filing of the lawsuit, which
Inner City Press will be
following.
They say the
Federal Reserve Bank of New
York, which on January 29 was
instructed by the US State
Department to allow Juan
Guaido to access Venezuelan
accounts, will be helping its
Bangladeshi counterpart to get
to the bottom of the
hack. Those eyed include
Philippines’ Rizal Commercial
Banking Corporation or RCBC
and some of its officials, and
Philrem Service Corporation,
casino owners and
beneficiaries. Ajmalul Hossain
QC, a lawyer for the central
bank, is with them to file the
case.
It is an
interesting twist on the SDNY
as venue for the money
laundering and FCPA
prosecution of Patrick Ho of
CEFC for bribery in Chad and
to Uganda - in this case, too,
the money flowed through New
York. Inner City Press intends
to cover the case.
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
Box 20047, Dag Hammarskjold
Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2019 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|