In
SDNY Case of the Frozen Kiwis
Maersk Is Sued For $41000 for
Temperature Abuse From Italy to
Newark
By Matthew
Russell Lee
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
May 24 –
Kiwis that were
frozen and damaged while being
shipped from Italy to Newark,
New Jersey were the subject on
May 24 of a 4:30 pm proceeding
in the U.S.
District Court
for the
Southern
District of
New York
courtroom of
Judge Gregory H.
Woods. The amount
being sued for
is $41,000.
Judge Woods,
who is
overseeing
among other
things a
multi-defendant Hunts
Point, Bronx
crack conspiracy
prosecution, asked
the parties if
they would
consent to
moving the
case to a
Magistrate judge.
They did not
answer. So Judge
Woods ordered
them again,
and they said
no. On the Friday
before Memorial
Day weekend, in a
courtroom
otherwise
empty but for
Inner City
Press, they
appeared.
Porto Pavino LCC
of Harrison, New
York wanted to
ship 2500
cases of fresh
kiwis from
Genoa, Italy to
Newark, New
Jersey in 2018. They
paid A.P.
Moller-Maersk
A/S to do it,
aboard the M/V
Sealand
Illinois. But
in the two
week crossing
of the Atlantic
something
happened.
The kiwis
were supposed
to be kept at
0.0 degrees
Celsius.
But when they
arrived in
Newark they
were, in fact,
frozen. The
complaint says that
"following the
said temperature
abuse, the consignment
was not in the
same good
order and condition
as when
first received
by the
Defendant, but
instead had
suffered physical
damage while
in said
Defendant's
care,
custody and
control."
Now the
lawsuit for
$41,000. Judge
Woods asked if
exchanging
basic
discovery will
help them
settle the case.
Inner City
Press will
continue to cover
this Case of
the Frozen
Kiwis. It is
Porto Pavino
LLC v. A.P.
Moller-Maersk,
19-cv-2029.
Back on May 7
after a New York based shipper
sued Ohio-based Specialty
Processing LLC in
the SDNY,
the main
obstacle to
settling the
case it
emerged on May
7 is the
defendants
desire not to,
by settling,
consent to
jurisdiction.
SDNY Judge
John G. Koeltl
was quick to
say that
settlement
would not
imply that the
case ever had
jurisdiction.
But the lawyer
for the
shipper MTS
Logistics said
his client
would like the
court to
remain
involved to
enforce the
settlement. A
pause ensued.
(The case is
19-cv-1973.)
Finally Judge
Koeltl, who
often seems
eager to kick
cases up to
White Plains
-- as in the
case of the
rogue
collections
marshals, see
below -- or
down to
magistrates,
suggested that
a settlement
could involve
default
judgment in
the case of
non
compliance,
with the
default
judgment to be
sought in the
courts of
Ohio, whether
Southern or
Northern
District as he
put it.
All
roads lead to
the SDNY, but
not all
vessels are
welcome. We'll
have more on
this.
Back on April 18
the systemic scam of marshals
seizing money for factoring
companies from out of state
banks emerged with Inner City
Press again the only media
present in the SDNY courtroom
of Judge Koeltl. A
reciever in
from Detroit
was contesting
a factoring
company using
NYC Marshal
Beagle to
seize money
from
Michigan's
Comerica Bank.
The factoring
company's
lawyer, with
the same last
name, said it
was fine since
Comerica like
BB&T - the
example he
gave - use the
New York
courts, so
should they
turn over
money. The
marshal's
lawyer's
argument were
less clear,
but they are
due on June
14. Inner City
Press will
cover this -
and BB&T.
Earlier on
April 18 before SDNY Judge
Koeltl a doctor
facing an NYPD parking ticket
and reportedly saying "I'm the
hero" back in 2016 resurfaced
before
Judge as a
police
brutality jury
trial. Rachel
Wellner was at
the
plaintiff's
table and NYPD
officer Vega
was on the
stand, getting
asked Didn't
you touch near
her breast?
Wellner was a
breast surgeon
at Montefiore
Hospital in
The Bronx but
got fired
after what the
tabloids
called her
"cop ram"
incident. On
April 18,
Wellner took
the stand and
by day's end
was grilled by
the City on
when she
called the New
York Post, and
about saying
she was led
out of the
precinct in a
chain gang.
She said based
on the photo
the chain gang
must have come
later. She
said the New
York Post
called her,
and she asked
them not to
publish her
name. They've
since reported
on and excerpted
from what they
called her
"semi-autobiographical
novel." The
judge has told
the jurors not
to seek out
any
information on
the case - or
presumably the
novel. They
will not sit
on Good Friday
but resume on
Monday. By the
end of April
18 her lawyers
had used seven
hours and 50
minutes; the
City had used
three hours
and 32
minutes. Inner
City Press
stayed another
two hours for
a crack sales
plea
agreement, a
pharmacist
pleading not
guilty to oxy
sales, a
sentenced man
staying out
for months
taking his
wife's
narcotics and
finally a
lawsuit on
controversial
seizures by
New York
marshals of
out of state
debtors'
assets. Watch
this site.
When
Wellner began
she made a
point of
immediately
telling the
jury that she
organized
medical
missions to
Nicaragua and
that along
with his
$450,000
salary at
Montefiore she
was able to be
back with the
Latino
community she
feel in love
with. The
government /
defense did
not object.
Across the
hall an
insider
trading
prosecution
got interesting
- but Inner
City Press
will return to
the Wellner
case.
Back on April
16, the second
day of the
trial, Vega's
partner
Nicolett
Davodian was
on the stand
and her
deposition and
previously
filed reports
were being
used against
her. When did
she start
saying that
Vega's knees
were swollen?
That Wellner
had allegedly
called all
female NYPD
officer a
derogatory
word for
lesbian? And
the now
somewhat
famous, "I'm
the hero, the
cops are not
heroes"? There
were many I
can't recalls.
Coming next is
the two
officers'
supervisor,
who allegedly
reprimanded
Davodian for
gloating to
Wellner upon
subsequent
full arrest,
Are you happy
now you crazy
f*cking b*tch?
Inner City
Press will be
there - watch
this site.
Both
the Daily New
and the New
York Post at
the time
mocked her for
saying she was
the hero and
the NYPD was
not. Her civil
complaint
recites her
voluntary work
in Nicaragua
and Israel.
SDNY Judge
John G. Koeltl
at the end of
questioning on
April 15 told
the jury to be
sure not to
check social
media (how
realistic that
is today is a
question),
then held
several off
the record
sidebars with
the case's
attorneys,
followed by
pleasantries
with visitors
from
Australia.
We'll have
more on this
trial.
Earlier on April 15 former
NYPD officer Gerard Scparta
pled guilty on April 12 to
theft of public funds in the
form of SSI disability
benefits and to tax
evasion. SDNY
Judge
Alison Nathan
set his
sentencing
date for July
16; the US
Attorney's
office has
agreed to a
sentence guideline
between
30 and 37
months in
prison. As
part of the
plea ritual
Judge Nathan
asked if the
events had taken
place in the
SDNY. First
there was
mention of
Staten Island
- which is the
Eastern
District - then
that the
Social
Security
office Scparta
dealt with was
in Orange
County, in the
SDNY. The strip club
where he work
while claiming
to be disabled
was in
Manhattan. But
there's more:
as
recounted in
the complaint
that was superseded
on April
15, " a
cooperating
witness
("CW-1") 2 , I
have learned
the following,
in substance
and in part:
a. Between in
or about 1987
and in or
about 1990,
GERARD
SCPARTA, the
defendant, and
CW-1 both
worked
together as
NYPD officers
on a taskforce
in the 1st
Precinct in
Manhattan. b.
Between
approximately
in or about
1992 and in or
about 2012,
CW-1 referred
NYPD police
officers to
CC-1 so that
CC-1 could
assist the
officers to
defraud the
SSA by
submitting
applications
for SSD that
contained
false
statements
regarding
purported
disabilities.
Because
officers who
had sustained
legitimate
injuries while
working could
still perform
certain types
of work, many
of the
officers
referred to
CC-1 by CW-1
falsely stated
to the SSA
that they were
depressed
and/or had
mental health
issues in
order to
certify that
they were
incapable of
performing any
gainful
activity. In
exchange for
referring
these officers
to CC-1, CW-1
received four
months of the
disability
benefits
received by
any officer
who was
approved to
receive
benefits. c.
In or about
1997,
approximately
one year prior
to SCPARTA's
submission of
an application
for SSD
benefits to
the SSA, CW-1
referred
SCPARTA to
CC-1.
Specifically,
CW-1 escorted
SCPARTA to
CC-l's
residence for
meetings on
approximately
three or four
occasions over
the course of
a year."
There is a
footnote: "
Like CC-1,
CW-1 has
pleaded guilty
to grand
larceny in New
York State
Court for his
involvement in
this scheme to
defraud the
SSA. CW-1 is
cooperating
with law
enforcement
with the hope
of receiving a
more lenient
sentence." Inner City
Press aims to
have more on
this, and on
the two counts
in the superseding
information
that Scparta
pled not
guilty to on
Monday.
Back on April 12
when Will Baez came up for
sentencing on he faced a
mandatory minimum ten years in
prison for five kilos of
heroin and a .45 handgun and
ammo in his Bronx apartment.
The courtroom of SDNY
Judge Ronnie
Abrams was packed
with dozens of
family and friends,
and Baez spoke
about his
seven year old
daughter and
dream of opening
an auto body
shop. His lawyer spoke
of conditions
in the MCC: 26
men on 13 bunk
beds in a unit
with one
toilet and one
shower and
rodents in the
walls. There
was no
discussion of
the safety
value
provisions of
the First Step
Act, which
later in the day got
a reduction
for another
defendant
caught with
five kilos of
what he
thought was heroin.
Judge
Abrams showed
those in
the courtroom
the sentencing
guidelines
book and said
Baez
need not be
defined by
the worst day
in his life. But ten
years
are ten years.
He waved as
they led him
to the
elevator of 40
Foley Square
in shackles.
Another
defendant on
April 9
before SDNY
Judge Gregory
Woods had
no fewer than
three defense
lawyers with
him, more than
some
defendants who
face and
receive much
longer
sentences. But
Judge Woods'
reasoning for
imposing a
sentence of 48
month in
prison rather
than the lower
guideline of
57 months was
that Martinez
was that his
was the lower
level of the
gang, that
this will be
his longest
sentence on 15
convictions,
and that Judge
Woods hopes
Martinez can
get back to
his 13 year
old son faster
than 57
months. It was
as is often
the case with
Judge Woods a
comprehensive
and human
sentencing,
ending with an
"I wish you
well" and
"Thanks." The
lawyers, it
seems, were
from DLA
Piper; it
contrasts to
other cases
Inner City
Press has
witnessed this
year, where a
defendant
complained
that his
passport was
not returned,
for example.
We'll have
more on this.
The U.S.
Treasury employee accused in
October of leaking Suspicious
Activity Reports about Paul
Manafort and others, Natalie
Edwards, pled not guilty back
on January 30 before
Judge Woods. Her next
appearance was set for April
4 at 2 pm, but when Inner
City Press came in again
through the metal detectors
to cover it, other cases
were on in Judge Woods' 12th
floor courtroom. His deputy
informed Inner City
Press that Edwards was
adjourned to May 2 at 10 am.
One
of the other cases in front
of Judge Woods, a defense
lawyer argued that his
client Freddy would never
have voluntarily told the
detectives that he is a
"great dice roller;" he is
making a suppression motion.
But it will be delayed, by
vacation and the prosecutor
being on trial. Judge Woods
urges both sides to file
more quickly, and pointed
asked if a police witness
had, in fact, perjured
himself. That trial is set
for July 22 - the case did
not seem to be listed on the
board in the lobby of 500
Pearl Street, and still
without electronics it was
not easy to inquire, yet.
Back on
January 20 on Worth Street,
Inner City Press asked her
lawer Jacob Kaplan of Brafman
& Associates about a
statement made during the
proceeding, that another
person's device was also
search. Kaplan acknowledged
that had been said, adding
that he didn't know who it
was. Video here,
Vine here.
Jump cut to 2 April
2019: "I was a
street drug dealer in
from of my building in
the Bronx," a defendant
told U.S.
District Court
for the
Southern District of
New York Judge
Paul A.
Engelmayer on
April 2.
Defendant Gonzalez
was pleading
guilty to a
lesser
included
charge, with a
guideline
sentence
of between 120
and 150 months
in jail. But
he won't be
sentenced
until July 11 at 2:30
pm, after the
Probation
Department
does its
interview and
issues a Pre
Sentencing
Report that
will remain
sealed until,
somehow,
Gonzalez
appeals. We'll
have more on
this - there
were no family
members in the
courtroom,
no media other
than Inner
City Press.
Less
than hour earlier when
Eldar Rakhamimov appeared
for sentencing for inflating
the number of Pepsi and Canada Dry
bottles
returned through his business in the
SDNY
courtroom of
Judge
Ronnie Abrams,
he had many of
his
employees and
family members
with him.
His lawyer
Tony Mirvis
pointed them
out, arguing
that if not
sentenced to
jail he could
pay
back the
$700,000 restitution
faster. But half of
the debt is to
the State of
New York;
recently Judge
Abrams
rejected just
such has
argument from
a medical
software
company executive
on tax fraud.
Here, Judge
Abrams went
below the 37
to 46 month guideline
sentence, to
15 months with
two
years of
supervised
released - the
books of his
recycling company
will be open -
and a
$15,000 fine. Two of
his employees
were asked to
take off their
caps by the
Court Security
Officers. The
prosecutor
said, It would
not be a bad
thing if his
company just
fell apart.
The case is US
v. Eldar
Rakhamimov,
18 – CR – 72
(RA).
***
Feedback: Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
Box
20047, Dag Hammarskjold Station NY
NY 10017
Other, earlier Inner
City Press are listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2019 Inner
City Press, Inc. To request reprint or
other permission, e-contact Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com for
|