In
SDNY Illiterate Manaf Accused
of Haqqani Network Links Is
Told Family Should Not
Threaten Witnesses Incongruous
Texts
By Matthew
Russell Lee
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
April 4 –
Accusing
of trafficking
heroin to support
the Haqqani
network in
Afghanistan, the
US Attorney's
Office on April 4
asked that
defendant
Haji Abdul Satar
Abdul Manaf be
admonished to tell
his family members
in Afghanistan not
to threaten witnesses.
U.S. District
Court for the
Southern District of
New York Judge
Paul Crotty was
happy to do
so, and set a
control date
30 days out about
discovery.
But an
incongruity
arose. It was
said that
Manaf can
neither read nor
write, yet the
prosecutor
referred to
hundreds of text
messages as
being part of
the discovery.
Afterward,
Inner City Press
the only media
present for
the proceeding
asked her to
explain. She
politely
declined.
Judge Crotty
meanwhile
asked Manaf's
lawyer in
what language
she speaks
with him - Urdu - then
asked, You
don't speak
Pashtun?
We'll have
more on this.
The
Federal Defenders scored
a big win in a
misdemeanor proceeding
that only Inner City
Press attended
and covered on April
2. They
defeated the
U.S. Attorney's
Office
which argued
that the
simple assault
they agreed to
on a dispute
on a cruise
ship required
allocution to
actual
physical
conflict.
There was case law on
the Federal
Defenders'
side, and a
plea to making
a threat on
the cruise
ship - in
"international
waters" -- was
found
sufficient.
The case was United
States v.
Batista, 18
Cr. 730 (NRB). The
Federal
Defenders
lawyer was
Sabrina P.
Shroff, whom
Inner City
Press has
previously
covered in the
UN bribery
cases of
Patrick Ho
(new Hong
Kong documentary
here),
getting
bail for Cheikh Gadio, and
of Ng Lap
Seng,
representing
hapless Jeff Yin. The
issue in
Batista was whether
simple assault
requires the
defendant to
"strike or
choke." Ms.
Shroff cited
the US v
Denis and US v
Chestaro
cases, and the
matter was
quickly
disposed by
Judge Naomi
Reice Buchwald in her
relatively
small
courtroom on
the 21st floor
of 500 Pearl
Street. The question
is why the
U.S.
Attorney's Office
in this case
had not
researched basic
case law - and
whether the
defendant
Carlos Batista, Junior,
from the Dominican
Republic, must
now be deported.
We hope to
have more on
this.
Earlier
on April 2, in 40 Foley: "I
was a street drug dealer in
from of my building in
the Bronx," a defendant
told SDNY
Judge Paul
A. Engelmayer
on April 2.
Defendant Gonzalez
was pleading
guilty to a
lesser
included
charge, with a
guideline
sentence
of between 120
and 150 months
in jail. But
he won't be
sentenced
until July 11 at 2:30
pm, after the
Probation
Department
does its
interview and
issues a Pre
Sentencing
Report that
will remain
sealed until,
somehow,
Gonzalez
appeals. We'll
have more on
this - there
were no family
members in the
courtroom,
no media other
than Inner
City Press.
Less
than hour earlier when
Eldar Rakhamimov appeared
for sentencing for inflating
the number of Pepsi and Canada Dry
bottles
returned through his business in the
SDNY
courtroom of
Judge
Ronnie Abrams,
he had many of
his
employees and
family members
with him.
His lawyer
Tony Mirvis
pointed them
out, arguing
that if not
sentenced to
jail he could
pay
back the
$700,000 restitution
faster. But half of
the debt is to
the State of
New York;
recently Judge
Abrams
rejected just
such has
argument from
a medical
software
company executive
on tax fraud.
Here, Judge
Abrams went
below the 37
to 46 month guideline
sentence, to
15 months with
two
years of
supervised
released - the
books of his
recycling company
will be open -
and a
$15,000 fine. Two of
his employees
were asked to
take off their
caps by the
Court Security
Officers. The
prosecutor
said, It would
not be a bad
thing if his
company just
fell apart.
The case is US
v. Eldar
Rakhamimov,
18 – CR – 72
(RA).
The day before in a
class action lawsuit against
BHH's rodent
repellers creeps toward
trial or settlement, SDNY Judge
William Pauley
heard
arguments and
ruled on no
fewer than
14 motions in
limine. There
were nine from
the class
action plaintiffs,
mostly successful, and
five from the
defendant,
most unsuccessful.
During
the three
hours of
argument,
Judge Pauley said
today is not
the day to
admit
anonymous
customer reviews
from
Amazon.com
from the likes
of "TaterSpud59"
(whom he
referred to as
Tater Tot),
and said that
FTC press
releases dubious
about
repellers will or
would be
admissible at
trial, with a
possible
limiting
instruction.
There
was discussion
of experts
including a
Michigan State
University
protocol which
Judge Pauley
shot down, adding
that after MSU's
victory over
Duke, he is
not disposed
toward
them. Judge
Pauley took
more time listening
to arguments
than many
other judges
would, and
said he said
spent the
rainy Sunday -
on which Duke
was eliminated
from NCAA March
Madness -
to read all of
the papers.
The sense,
after the
mouse motion marathon,
was that the
plaintiffs are
in the driver's
seat, and that
the case may
settle. There
is a mediation
scheduled for
April 9 before
Hon. John S.
Martin (Ret). But
Inner
City Press
will be cover
it and what
happens in the
SDNY
either way. The case is
Hart, et
al. v. BHH,
LLC d/b/a Bell
+ Howell, et
al., 15-cv-04804;
class counsel
is Yitzchak
Kopel
and BHH is now
represented by
Quinn
Emanuel.
***
Feedback: Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
Box
20047, Dag Hammarskjold Station NY
NY 10017
Other, earlier Inner
City Press are listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2019 Inner
City Press, Inc. To request reprint or
other permission, e-contact Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com for
|