| NYC Ban on Protests Was Sued
By Pam Geller Now NYCLU Case Mooted By Cuomo
EO
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon
BBC
- Guardian
UK - Honduras
- The
Source
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
May 22 – New York
City's banning of "any
non-essential gatherings of
individuals of any size for
any reason," imposed by an
Executive Order in March but
reiterated by Mayor Bill De
Blasio on May 4, was
challenged in a hearing on May
15 before U.S. District Court
for the Southern District of
New York Judge Denise L. Cote.
Inner City Press
live-tweeted it, here.
That challenged was by Pamela
Gellar.
Now on May 22,
Linda Bouferguen similarly
sued, represented by the
NYCLU. But when SDNY Judge
John G. Koeltl heard the case,
the State's and City's lawyers
said that Governor Cuomo was
about to sign an Executive
Order allow gatherings of up
to 10 people. So the relief
requested was moot. NYCLU's
Christopher T. Dunn thanked
Judge Koeltl. Meanwhile on
42nd Street in Manhattan, the
United Nations says it can
throw out any journalist it
doesn't like, and nothing this
time from the NYCLU. What
gives? Inner City Press will
have more on this. This case
is Bouferguen v. Cuomo, et
al., 20-cv-3975 (Koeltl).
Last week,
the restriction was challenged
by Pam Geller, represented by
the American Freedom Law
Center's David Yerushalmi.
His
complaint noted that "De
Blasio has implemented an Open
Streets initiative whereby
certain City streets are open
to pedestrians and cyclists" -
but closed for First Amendment
protest."
In the May
15 oral argument, Yerushalmi
cited three Circuit decisions
granting a TRO against
COVID-19 lockdowns and offered
to discuss them.
Judge Cote said, No, the
matter is fully submitted and
ready for my decision. I'm not
sure the City needs to say
anything.
But the
lawyer for New York City said,
People are not allowed to do
sports on streets either --
only "solo exercising."
Judge Cote ruled, Having
reviewed the parties'
submissions and the arguments,
I am going to deny the May 12
motion for a TRO. Given the
length of time between the
March 25 Executive Order and
this application, urgency is
lacking.
In the
docket, Geller's declaration
said "I quickly realized that
no blog or podcast or radio
interview would gain any media
traction in today's
environment. The only viable
means... would be a public
protest."
Judge Cote noted,
THe Plaintiff cites allegedly
anti-Semitic remarks by the
Mayor... The First Amendment
is not absolute. NYC is an
epicenter of Covid-19, and
"the March 25 order is content
neutral."
Yerushalmi said he will
appeal. Inner City Press aims
to continue to follow this
case, which is Geller v. De
Blasio, et al., 20-cv-3566
(Cote).
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2020 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
|
,
