Inner City Press





In Other Media-eg New Statesman, AJE, FP, Georgia, NYTAzerbaijan, CSM Click here to contact us     .



These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis
,



Share |   

Follow on TWITTER

Home -

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis

CONTRIBUTE

Books

RSS

(FP Twitterati 100, 2013)

ICP on YouTube

More: InnerCityPro

BloggingHeads.tv
Sept 24, 2013

UN: Sri Lanka

VoA: NYCLU

FOIA Finds  

Google, Asked at UN About Censorship, Moved to Censor the Questioner, Sources Say, Blaming UN - Update - Editorial

Support this work by buying this book
Belt and Roadkill
(and paperback)

Click on cover for secure site orders

also includes "Toxic Credit in the Global Inner City"
 

 

 


Community
Reinvestment

Bank Beat

Freedom of Information
 

How to Contact Us



Russia Sanctions Leave VTB Without Counsel In SDNY as US Bank Refuses To Process Wire

By Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Maxwell Book
BBC-Guardian UK - Honduras - ESPN NY Mag

SDNY COURTHOUSE, June 23 – Sanctions on Russia have an unnamed US financial institution unwilling to process a wire transfer to pay the Brafman & Associates law firm to represented VTB Bank in the case Schansman et al v. Sberbank of Russia PJSC et al. 

 On June 23 Brafman & Associates' Zach Intrater filed an affidavit about his efforts with U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein, now on Patreon here:

"Zach Intrater, being duly sworn, deposes and says:  1. I am an attorney licensed in the state of New York.  2. I currently am employed as Of Counsel at Brafman & Associates, P.C., a  law firm in New York.  3. I am familiar with the facts set forth in this affidavit. 

4. This affidavit incorporates the facts set forth in an affidavit I signed on  June 15, 2022, which was included as part of Docket No. 358 in this  matter. 

5. The Court’s June 16, 2022 Order (Dkt. No. 360) granted an extension of  time for VTB Bank to obtain new counsel, but ordered that no further  extensions would be granted absent a sworn statement from someone  with personal knowledge that provides a daily log of the efforts to arrange  for a new attorney to file a notice of appearance. (See Dkt. No. 360.). This  affidavit will detail those daily efforts. 

6. On Wednesday, June 15, 2022, I spoke with a representative from OFAC  regarding my firm’s interpretation of the applicable federal regulations  governing payments to attorneys by blocked entities. 

7. On Thursday, June 16, 2022, I participated in phone calls with  representatives of VTB Bank regarding the retention issue. I also  communicated, via e-mail and phone, with a representative of the  financial institution (“the Financial Institution”) at which my firm  maintains its attorney trust account. I described to the representative of  the Financial Institution my June 15, 2022 phone call with the OFAC  representative. I also explained our interpretation of the applicable  federal regulations...On Monday, June 20, 2022, notwithstanding the federal holiday on  which the banks were closed, I communicated, via email, with  representatives of VTB Bank regarding this issue, in a continued effort to  find a way, consistent with all laws and regulations, to allow my firm to  enter an appearance in this matter. At 12:32 pm, the representative of  the Financial Institution sent an email on which I was copied. The email  stated, in substance, that the representative had met with other  employees of the Financial Institution in an effort to resolve the issue.  The email further stated that, although the payment of funds by VTB  Bank was legal, the Financial Institution would not accept a wire transfer  from Russia because it was outside the Financial Institution’s “risk  framework.” 

14. On Tuesday, June 21, 2022, I participated in communications, via  email and phone, with members of my firm and by email with  representatives of VTB Bank in a continued effort to figure out a solution  to this issue. 

15. On Wednesday, June 22, 2022, I participated in communications,  via email and phone, with members of my firm and by email with  representatives of VTB Bank. 

16. Today, June 23, 2022, our firm initiated discussions with another  financial institution to receive the payment that has been made by VTB  Bank. That financial institution has indicated that it will have an answer  for us by early next week – the week of June 27, 2022. 

17. As of today, my firm is still unable to receive payment of any funds as a retainer in this matter. This is so notwithstanding that the payment  would be legal pursuant to the applicable federal regulations and  statutes, and notwithstanding the continued best efforts of  representatives of VTB Bank to figure out a way to have new counsel (our  firm) represent them in this matter." Inner City Press will continue to cover this.

The case is Schansman et al v. Sberbank of Russia PJSC et al., 19-cv-2985 (Carter / Gorenstein)   

***

@SDNYLIVE courthouse #CourtCastCast
                              200 Worth Street
Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA

Mail: Box 20047, Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540



Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2022 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com