After Money Laundering
Arrest in NJ Chowdhury Is Released By SDNY
Magistrate With Docketing Delayed
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Exclusive; Video, pics
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
June 18 – A defendant named
Chowdhury was arrested on
federal money laundering
charges at 5:45 am on June 18
in Secaucus, New Jersey.
He had his case
sealed with delayed docketing
when he was released 12 hours
later by U.S.
District Court
for the
Southern
District of
New York
Magistrate
Judge Sarah
Netburn.
While no
rationale for
sealing the
record was
given, it
would appear
either than
the SDNY prosecutors
hope to use
Chowdhury as a
cooperator
against
others, or
that there are
others named
in the sealed
complaint he
was arrested
under and so
they are
trying in this
way to keep it
secret.
Perhaps
understandable
but the
reasons should
be stated.
Inner City
Press was the
only media in
the SDNY
Magistrates
Court. While being
denied access
to the
one-count complaint
alluded to but
not read out
by Judge
Netburn,
Inner City
Press can report
that
Chowdhury's
lawer is
Federal
Defender Ian
Marcus
Amelkin, who
only minutes
before had
argued unsuccessfully for
release on
bond for a
defendant with a
history of
domestic violence
and most
recently a
loaded hand
gun.
Chowdhury
was released
on his own
signature. He
had two family
members in the
Magistrates
Courtroom
gallery, who indicated
they would co-sign a
$150,000 bond. They
were given a
week to do so.
Chowdhury
as a condition
of release
was ordered to
"refrain from
the excessive
consumption of
alcohol."
Amelkin
said Chowdhury
has not had a
drink in 20
years. Judge
Netburn
shot back, Then
it's an easy
condition of
release.
Easy,
indeed. And
troublingly
secret, or to be
more precise,
made secret almost reflexively,
with no reason
given or
opportunity
for the Press,
representing
the public, to
be heard.
This is a trend.
Only the day before, a
sentencing of a defendant
seeking time served, seemingly
for cooperation with the
government, was abruptly
declared "sealed" by SDNY
Judge Lorna G.
Schofield.
She
said she was
going to seal
the
transcript,
but that once
this reporter
walked into
her open
courtroom 1106
in 40 Foley
Square, she
moved the
entire
proceeding
into her
robing room,
closed to the
Press and
public.
When
she and the
shackled
defendant,
Assistant US
Attorneys and
US Marshals
emerged twenty
minutes later,
Judge
Schofield said
only, "We're
adjourned."
There was no
disclosure of
the outcome of
the proceeding
- as Inner
City Press
walked in, the
defendant's
lawyer was
asking for
time served."
Then
Judge
Schofield said
she wanted to
"shake hands
with our
visitors" and
proceeded to
do just that
with the two
other people
in the
gallery. Inner
City Press
left.
No one where
on the
electronic
board in the
SDNY lobby at
500 Pearl
Street was any
proceeding
before Judge
Schofield at
that time
list. Nor in
the day's
PACER
calendar.
So it is both
a confidential
sentencing,
and a
confidential
case?
Judge
Schofield's
Rules for
Criminal
Cases,
ironically,
provide that
there is a
presumption
that all
sentencing
submissions
are public,
and that if
anything is
redacted only
those pages
with
redactions can
be withheld
from the
public docket.
But no such
distinction is
possible when
an entire
proceeding is
moved into the
judge's robing
room barred to
the press and
public, with
no notice or
opportunity to
be heard.
Inner City
Press will
have more on
this - see
also @InnerCityPress
and the new @SDNYLIVE.
Before Judge Schofield: Steven
M. Calk of FDIC-regulated
Federal Savings Bank was
presented and arraigned on May
23 for financial institution
bribery for corruptly using
his position with FSB to issue
$16 million in high-risk loans
to Paul Manafort in a bid to
obtain a senior position with
the Trump administration,
namely Undersecretary of the
Army.
Back on
May 23 Magistrate Judge Debra
Freeman accepted the
government's proposal of $5
million bond with no co-signer
(although that is usually
required for moral suasion)
and travel allowed throughout
the United States (though more
defendants are usually
confined to the Soutern and
Eastern District of NY and one
other district). Money talks.
Afterward
in front of the SDNY
courthouse Inner City Press
asked Calk's lawyers Daniel
Stein and Jeremy Margoles
about Manafort saying he had
misstated his financial
situation to get the FSB
loans. When did Calk know?
They did not answer. Video here,
Facebook video here.
Inner City Press' Alamy photos
here.
Now in May
28 letter to District Judge
Lorna G. Schofield, the
government has requested the
motions directed of their
indictment of Calk be filed by
July 12. Judge Schofield
granted it only in part,
saying that by June 21 Calk
"shall file a pre-motion
letter with a briefing
description of any motion(s)
he intends to file." While the
OCC has yet to sufficiently
answer, and is trying to
hinder Inner City Press'
reporting, we will stay on
this case.
On May 23,
still from the SDNY courthouse
covering other cases including
one involving the death
penalty, Inner City
Press reported
finding no U.S. Home Mortgage
Disclosure Act data for
"Federal Savings Bank." But
there's more.
The Federal
Savings Bank's website,
while providing a generic link
to the FDIC, and a statement
"Member FDIC," has no link for
the U.S. Community
Reinvestment Act. (Nor does it
mention the indictment of
Stephen Calk, simply listing
his brother John Calk now as
CEO and Vice Chairman. Who is
the chairman?)
It lists a
loan production office on
Avenue J in Brooklyn, and two
deposit taking braches in
Illinois. Did it see some
exemption from the CRA and
other consumer protection
laws? From fair lending laws?
Earlier on
the morning of May 24 Inner
City Press asked the FDIC,
"Having covered yesterday's
arraignment of the Chairman of
The Federal Savings Bank in
the SDNY courthouse, including
the FDIC's involvement, I
checked the bank's website and
found "Member FDIC" but no
mention of the Community
Reinvestment Act."
The FDIC's
spokesperson David Barr, to
his credit, responded quickly,
writing to Inner City Press:
"The Federal Savings Bank,
Chicago, is regulated by the
Office of the Comptroller of
the Currency. They would be
responsible for CRA and
regulatory oversight. You
should contact the OCC for
more information."
Now the
OCC under Comptroller Joseph
Otting has done everything
possible to block the release
of information, denying FOIA
fees waivers and expedited
treatment, refusing comments.
But for now online the OCC has
said this about The Federal
Savings Bank: "While TFSB
originated a substantial
majority of its loans outside
of its AAs; the bank’s
business strategy is to
operate as a mortgage banking
entity with a nationwide
presence and market place.
Taking the bank’s business
strategy into consideration
the bank’s performance under
this lending criterion is
deemed reasonable."
Reasonable? Bribery, too,
seems to have been part of its
business strategy, right under
the nose of the OCC of Otting.
Before 2
pm on May 24 Inner City Press
in writing asked Otting's OCC:
"This is a Press question for
the OCC, from Inner City
Press... Please confirm that
The Federal Savings Bank is
subject to HMDA, and/or if it
is below a threshold, as I can
find no data in its name on
FFIEC.gov. Also, please today
provide as an OCC response to
the Press this OCC-regulated
bank's CRA public file and
other information in the OCC's
possession concerning the
bank's CRA and fair lending
performance. Is it
normal for a bank not to
mention these things on its
website, nor to provide any
link to its actual regulator,
the OCC, but only to the
FDIC?
Please explain what steps the
OCC is taking beyond Stephen
Calk no longer being the CEO.
What about his brother?"
More than
three hours later, even to the
questions at the end, the OCC
had only provided this:
"We are reviewing your
questions, but we may not be
able to respond by your
deadline.
Regards,
Stephanie
Stephanie Collins
Manager, Media Relations
Public Affairs
Operations Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency."
This is the same OCC which has
delayed FOR MONTHS providing
basic information about a
merger it has now already
rubber stamped.
On the
morning of May 28 Inner City
Press received from the OCC a
statement that The Federal
Savings Banks is subject to
HMDA - how they are listed in
the HMDA database remains a
question - and this:
"Question: Is it normal
for a bank not to mention
these things [CRA and HMDA] on
its website, nor to provide
any link to its actual
regulator, the OCC, but only
to the FDIC? [OCC
answer:] This question is best
directed to the bank."
So wait:
Otting's OCC leaves it
entirely up to the banks it
ostensibly regulates whether
to mention on their website
and presumably branches CRA,
HMDA or even the OCC where
consumers could complain?
We'll have more on this.
Stephen
Calk was quoted,
at least in 2012, opposing
regulation: "As Mr. Stephen
Calk writes in the September
7, 2012 edition of Origination
News: “Basel III is designed
to level the playing field
among major banking
institutions that operate
internationally. Force-feeding
these same rules to community
banks in the United States is
unnecessary and in fact
counter-productive,
particularly in the current
economic environment.” Basel
III is one thing. But no
Community Reinvestment Act?
The Federal
Savings Bank lists locations -
and bankers - in
Arizona - Scottsdale
California - Irvine Colorado -
Fort Collins Delaware -
Selbyville Florida - Sarasota
Illinois - Chicago Illinois -
Lake Forest Illinois - Oak
Brook Illinois - Park Ridge
Indiana - Bloomington Indiana
- Indianapolis Kansas -
Overland Park Louisiana -
Laplace Maryland - Annapolis
Maryland - Timonium CD
Massachusetts - Lawrence New
Jersey - Hackensack New Jersey
- Lakewood New York - Brooklyn
New York - Melville New York -
New York New York - Queens
North Carolina - Raleigh Ohio
- Columbus Rhode Island -
South Kingstown Tennessee -
Nashville Virginia -
Alexandria Virginia -
Fredericksburg Virginia -
Newport News Virginia -
Richmond Virginia - Vienna
Virginia - Warrenton...
We'll have more on this.
In the
indictment press release, FDIC
OIG Special Agent-in-Charge
Patricia Tarasca said,
“Today’s indictment charges
Stephen Calk with misusing his
position as Chairman and CEO
of a bank for his own personal
gain. The FDIC Office of
Inspector General remains
committed to investigating
cases where bank officials
cause multimillion-dollar
losses to a financial
institution and undermine its
integrity.” (The FDIC stands
to be the lead regulator of
BB&T whose money
laundering enforcement action
was just terminated by the
Federal Reserve to facilitate
merger with Suntrust, click here
for that and Inner City Press'
FOIA request and appeal.)
The
indictment was unsealed the
day after President Donald J.
Trump lost his bid to stay the
House of Representatives'
subpoenas to two other banks,
Capital One and Deutsche Bank.
After the May 22 ruling in Trump
v. Deutsche Bank by SDNY
Judge Edgardo Ramos, Trump
lawyer Patrick Strawbridge
headed to the elevators in the
windowless lobby outside the
courtroom.
He was
disinclined to comment and
even take questions from the
press. When reporters got on
the elevator with him, he got
off, saying sacrastically but
not bitterly, Much as I'd like
to be asked questions in the
elevator...
Downstairs in front of the
Thurgood Marshall courthouse
there were demonstrators will
a long Impeach Trump banner
and the small black Congress
Has A Right To Know signs,
three of which had been
quickly raised in the
courtroom, and just as quickly
taken down when Judge Ramos
requested it.
The SDNY
Court Security Officers spoke
to the sign holders but did
not eject them, during the 10
minute recess Judge Ramos took
to put the finishing touches
on his 25-page decision.
TV
crews from CNN and Univision
were set up across the street,
and a gaggle of photographers
set up on the sidewalk to wait
for Strawbridge and the House
of Representatives' lawyer
Douglas Letter. As time
passed others passing the
courthouse, and coming out of
it, stopped to ask as so often
happens, Who are you waiting
for?
While few had heard of
Strawbridge and the House
lawyer named Letter, the
mention of Trump drew a range
of reactions. The sight of
long lens cameras -- Inner
City Press had this day
retrieved it, from the
seemingly overflow Press Room
in the basement of 40 Foley
Square -- attracted others
with cases in the SDNY.
Accompanied by a trio of
children in wheelchairs on a
day when the disabled entrance
on Pearl Street to the
Thurgood Marshall courthouse
was closed were lawyers in Abrams
et al v. Carranza,
one in a series of Federal
lawsuits against campaigning
NYC Mayor Bill De Blasio's
Education Chancellor RIchard
Carranza. They had a flier and
expressed hope that SDNY Judge
Alison Nathan would, as
indicted, issue a ruling in
their case within the week.
Other
litigatants were less media
savvy or directed. Those in a
criminal trial before Judge
Vernon Broderick admitted the
case made it hard for even
them to stay awake -- Inner
City Press has tried several
times -- but noted that the
U.S. Attorney's office
promotes the prosecution each
morning in an e-mail.
The
plaintiff side in an
employment discrimination
trial in front of Judge
Valerie Caproni came out (the
defense may have been less
willing to approach the
press), then Judge Broderick
himself, down to earth as
ever. It was growing late.
To put its
camera back in the 40 Foley
press room, Inner City Press
climbed the stairs only to be
told, We close at five.
Explaining that there is a
Press Room next to the
cafeteria and that the Trump
case had done later was at
first to no avail. Finally a
supervisor was called who did
not acknowledge any right to
enter, but said he would allow
it this one time. We may have
more on this: even in the
small strokes, press access
rights are important,
particularly in a courthouse.
In May in the
SDNY, Congressman Christopher
Collins (R-NY) waived his
right to be present for a May
3 hearing in the criminal
insider trading case against
him held past 5 pm in the SDNY
courtroom of
Judge Broderick.
On May 10, Judge
Broderick
started on l'affaire
Collins at 2
pm, after a
case against
BuzzFeed
(Inner City
Press coverage
here).
Early in
the
proceeding,
before two
shackled inmates
were led in leading
to a brief
suspension of
the white
shoe SEC
Congressman
matter, Broderick
made a joke
about Donald
Trump and
evasive legal
moves. I'm not
going there, said
one of the
participants in
Collins, who was an
early endorser
of Trump.
Broderick
said, "I
shouldn't have
either
- but it is
what it is."
Three hours
later, during
which Inner
City Press in
full
disclosure
went one story
down in the courthouse
to cover
a Fatico
hearing about
threats in the
MCC, Judge
Broderick
was setting
the time for
Collins'
lawyers to
make motions.
He arrived
on four weeks
after he rules
on discovery, with
the SEC to
provide
whatever he
directs to the
defense one
week after the
ruling. I'm
not saying
you're going
to get anything, Judge
Broderick
said. Collins'
lead lawyer
said he is a
optimist. More on
Patreon;
watch this
site.
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
Box 20047, Dag Hammarskjold
Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2019 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|