In SDNY Telegram Response
Due Jan 3 Not in Docket Jan 4 Before SEC
Deposes Durov in Dubai
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon
BBC
- Decrypt
- LightRead - Honduras
-
Source
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
Jan 4 –
On the crypto-currency beat,
U.S. District Court for the
Southern District of New York
Judge P. Kevin Castel is set
to rule on a request by the
SEC for Telegram to reveal
bank records showing how it
spent $1.7 billion in ICO
funds. Telegram had until
January 3 at 5 pm to file its
response.
But as of 7 pm on January 4,
there was no response in the
docket. And the SEC's
deposition of Pavel Durov is
set to begin on January 7 in
Dubai. Inner City Press, which
is covered the saga of (ex?)
Ethereum Virgil Griffith, has
asked to be notified of any
and all filings in this case.
Here's
from the SEC's request: " The
SEC respectfully requests that
Telegram be compelled to
provide complete bank records
and answers questions about
Telegram’s use of these funds.
The SEC
seeks this information through
Telegram’s bank records, as
well as from Pavel Durov, the
witness designated as
Defendants’ corporate
representative pursuant to
Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6),
whose deposition is currently
scheduled to take place on
January 7 and 8, 2020, in
Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
37(a)(1), the undersigned
hereby certifies that he has
attempted to confer in good
faith with Defendants in an
effort to obtain the requested
bank records and information
without court action. After
various meet and confers on
this subject over the last
several weeks, on Friday,
December 27, 2019, the
undersigned advised Telegram’s
counsel that it was prepared
to file this motion that day
if Telegram did not agree to
provide its bank records
showing credits and debits.
Counsel for Defendants
represented to the undersigned
that, after consultation with
their clients, they would
produce the “bank records,”
and prepare Mr. Durov to
testify with respect to these
topics.
However,
Defendants produced records
showing only credits, and not
debits showing how Telegram
spent the investors’ money.
When, on December 30, 2019,
the undersigned complained
about the incomplete
production, counsel for
Defendants claimed they had
misunderstood the SEC’s
request to have been limited
to credits, even though we had
had an extended discussion
with them on December 27
regarding our need for bank
records including credits and
debits and even though our
request had been pending for
weeks and was reiterated in
writing the day before our
December 27 call (see Exs. A
& B). Counsel later
informed the undersigned that
they would not provide full
bank records themselves, but
instead only information,
culled by them, concerning
payments from Telegram to
third parties relating to the
TON project. They also
indicated that they could not
immediately produce those
records because Telegram was
no longer banking at the same
institution. In the meet and
confer process, the parties
also agreed that the SEC would
hold off filing this motion
sooner, so that counsel could
revert back to their client
one more time in an attempt to
resolve this, but that, if
filed, Telegram’s response to
this submission would be due
in one business day, instead
of the three set forth in the
Order.
At bottom,
Telegram does not want to tell
the SEC what it has done with
the $1.7 billion it raised
from investors. Because the
deposition of Defendants’
corporate representative is
slated to take place in Dubai
next Tuesday and Wednesday,
the SEC is filing this
application
today."
Watch this
site.
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2020 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|