Sneaky
Accountant Gets Two Years Amid
Questioning of General
Deterrence in Two Tier SDNY
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Periscope,
Photos
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
March 19 – When former CPA Tom
Shin appeared to be sentenced
on March 19 he had his mother,
father and brother with him in
Courtroom 443 of the U.S.
District Court
for the
Southern
District of
New York
before Judge
Valerie
Caproni. But
there was also
the victim,
who said he
chose not to
speak. Shin
had given him
copies of tax
forms never
filed, leaving
him with a tax
liability and
keeping over
$300,000.
Shin's lawyer
blamed this on
Shin growing
up poor and
said he now
worked for
Amazon
Warehouse and
a Korean
non-profit,
and will
re-take the
LSATs on March
30. She was
dismissive of
general
deterence,
wondering
aloud who
would ever
read about
this sentence.
(It's
worth noting that things are
made difficult for the press
to cover the SDNY, with long
lines and electronics taken
away by a Board of Judges unlike
in the U.S. District Court for
the District of Columbia;
we'll have more on this).
Caproni ended up imposing two
years in prison and two years
of supervised release,
something the U.S. Attorney's
office soon crowed about,
trying perhaps to create their
own general deterrence, a la
state media. Four days earlier
on March 15 when Kevin
Schuler, who pled guilty in
the Buffalo Billion case, came
up for sentencing his
lawyer Terrence Connors told
Judge Caproni that his law
firm has hired Schuler.
Connors argued
that Schuler
would be of
more use
giving
scared-straight
talks at law
schools and
colleges than
in jail. Judge
Caproni
ultimately
agreed, saying
that perhaps
Connors had a
gremlin in her
computer and
this this in
advance,
sentencing
Schuler to
"time served"
- one day,
between 6 am
and 3 pm - and
400 hours of
community
services, one
third of which
must be such
talks. (She
mentioned the
Kiwanis and
Lions
Club).
Afterward
Inner City
Press asked
Connors where
Schuler might
be teaching.
UB, he
mentioned,
University of
Buffalo - and
quickly
emphasized
that he does
NOT have a
gremlin in
Judge
Caproni's
computer.
Which is a
good thing
since in other
case, for
example a
Bronx mother
who had twenty
kilos of
narcotics in
the trunk of
her used Saab,
much longer
sentences are
given. But
Schuler
cooperated,
even helping
to exculpate
another
indicted
defendant, and
lost friends
in the
process.
Connors said
Buffalo is not
a small town -
it is a big
room.
Caproni's
courtroom is
smaller than
some other
SDNY judges',
but there were
three or four
reporters for
this
sentencing,
unlike for the
Bronx mothers.
Sometimes New
York City can
be too big...
Ealier on March
15 an NYPD officer who blew
the whistle on cheating in
promotion exams faced
blow-back himself on March 15
in the SDNY
Jonathan
Blatt is asking
SDNY
Judge William
H. Pauley to
restore his status
as a
probationary Lieutenant;
the NYPD's lawyer
said there are
sexual
harassment
complaints
against Blatt.
The City's
filings says
Blatt
"is charged
with violation
of NYPD rules
prohibiting
sexual
harassment and
the creation
of a hostile
work
environment.
The
allegations
against
plaintiff
include
comments
regarding
threesomes and
'blumkins,'
a particular
sexual act, to
a female
service
member."
While
some call it a
case of the
"Bad
Lieutenant,"
Blatt says his
termination
was
retaliation, casting a
chilling
effect on
himself and
other officers
to challenge the
department.
Cases going
both ways were
cited -- HANAC
(101 F 3d
877),
about the
Mayor's
decision, and
Bartels v.
Incorporated
Village of Lloyd,
751 F Supp 2d 387
at 397. Judge
Pauley
reserved
decision. The
case is Blatt v. City of
New York, 19 Civ. 1227
(WHP). Back on March 8 a
shooting in The Bronx in
October 2018 was the subject
of an ill-attended conference
in the SDNY.
Jerome Jackson
is described
as in a white
t-shirt with
silver handgun
on 2 October
2018 on
Freeman Street
- but in the
SDNY courtroom
of Judge Kevin
Castel he was
in jail house
blues and
shackles. His
lawyer Julia
Gatto
questioned
whether the
NYPD
detectives who
questioned
Jackson about
the shooting
were in fact
part of a
joint task
force with the
Feds - no,
Karin Potlock
for the
government
said, and on
that basis no
suppression -
and questioned
probable
cause. There
will be a
hearing on
that on April
Fools Day and
Inner City
Press aims to
be there. The
case is US
v. Jackson,
18 CR 760. A
week before on March 1 when
Statue of Liberty climber
Patricia Okoumou appeared in
the SDNY , it was to face
revocation of bail for more
recent climbs, all to protest
the separation of immigrant
families. SDNY Judge
Gorenstein did not revoke bail
but imposed house arrest. He
jibed that it appeared Ms.
Okoumou could only support
herself by donations garnered
by climbing. Afterward Inner
City Press asked her lawyer
Ron Kuby about this argument.
He said the judge has it
precisely wrong, or in
reverse: she raised money
because she is an activist,
she is not an actively in
order to make money. Ms.
Okoumou raised her fist, and
headed to Staten Island.
Photos here.
Inner City Press, which
interviewed Okoumou on
December 5 just after another
SDNY decision, in the Patrick
Ho / CEFC China Energy UN
bribery case, headed out and
streamed this
Periscope, and this Q&A,
with more to come, on this
case and others. How guns
eject shell casings was the
subject of expert testimony in
a Bronx gang trial on February
27 in the U.S.
District Court
for the
Southern
District of
New York.
Before Judge
Robert W.
Sweet, an ATF
agent traced a
bullet back to
Illinois;
under cross
examination he
said a shell
casing might
eject feet
rather than
yards unless
it bounced on
something.
Then testimony
went back to
2007, a
14-year old
with a gun
heading from
the Millbrook
projects to
the Mitchell
Houses. The
defense asked
for a mistrial
when the name
of a second
gang was
introduced;
the
prosecution
shot back (so
to speak) that
it came from
photos on the
defendant's
own Facebook
page. And so
it goes in
trials these
days. Back
on February 25 a prison
sentence of life plus five
years was imposed for a Bronx
murder by SDNY Chief Judge
Colleen McMahon on February
25. She presided over the
trial in which Stiven
Siri-Reynoso was convicted of,
among other things, murder in
aid of racketeering for the
death of Jessica White, a 28
year old mother of three, in
the Bronx in 2016. Jessica
White's mother was in the
court room; she was greeted by
Judge McMahon but declined to
speak before sentencing.
Siri-Reynoso was representing
himself by this point, with a
back-up counsel by his side.
Judge McMahon told him,
"You're a very smart man... a
tough guy, a calculating
person... You are a coward,
sent a child to do it for
you... Your emissary shot the
wrong person, a lovely lady...
It was a vicious, evil attack
against the good people of
that neighborhood." When she
imposed the life plus five
sentence, a woman on the
Jessica White side of the
courtroom cried out, yes
Ma'am, put the animal away!
Later, after Siri-Reynoso
ended asking how he can get
more documents about the case,
a woman on his side of the
courtroom said, "No te
preocupes, muchacho, Dios sabe
lo que hace" - don't worry,
God knows what he is doing.
But does He? Earlier on
February 25 when the
government tried to defend its
2018 change of policy or
practice on Special Immigrant
Juvenile status in the U.S.
District Court for the
Southern District of New York
Judge John G. Koeltl had many
questions about the change. He
asked, are you saying that all
the decisions before 2018 were
just wrong, under a policy in
place but not implemented at
the time? In the overflow
courtroom 15C the largely
young audience laughed, as the
government lawyer tried to say
it wasn't a change of policy
but rather an agency
interpretation of the statute.
Shouldn't there have been
notice and comment rulemaking
under the Administrative
Procedure Act? The government
said the argument proffered
for this was about the Freedom
of Information Act (on which,
as Inner City Press has noted,
the US Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency
has similarly reversed its
policy 180 degrees without
justification). SDNY Judge
Koeltl demanded t know if the
government is arguing that no
juvenile court in New York,
California (and maybe Texas
for other reasons he said) is
empowered to grant relief. The
answer was far from clear -
but where the ruling is going
does seem so. Watch this site.
The Bangladeshi Central Bank
which was hacked for $81
million in February 2016, on
January 31 sued in the US
District Court for the
Southern District of New York.
Now the first pre-trial
conference in the case has
been set, for 2 April 2019
before SDNY Judge Lorna G.
Schofield. Inner City Press
will be there.
In Dhaka, the
Criminal Investigation
Department which failed to
submit its probe report into
the heist on time has now been
ordered by Metropolitan
Magistrate
Sadbir Yasir
Ahsan
Chowdhury to
do so by March 13 in
Bangladesh Bank cyber heist
case.
In the U.S.
District Court for Central
California, the unsealed
criminal complaint against
Park Jin Hyuk lists four email
addresses involved in
spear-phishing Bangladesh Bank
and among others an unnamed
"African Bank;" one of these
addresses is said to also have
communicated with an
individual in Australia about
importing commodities to North
Korea in violations of UN
sanctions.
To the Federal
Reserve, Inner City Press has
requested records relating to
the Fed's role with response
due in 20 working days - watch
this site. In the SDNY, the
case is Bangladesh Bank v
Rizal Commercial Banking Corp
et al, U.S. District Court,
Southern District of New York,
No. 19-00983. On February 3 in
Dhaka Bangladesh Bank's
lawyer Ajmalul
Hossain
said it could take three years
to recover the money. The
Bank's deputy governor Abu
Hena Razee Hasan said those
being accused -- in the civil
not criminal suit -- include
three Chinese nationals.
Ajmalul Hossain said the Bank
is seeking its hacked million
plus interest and its expenses
in the case. He said US
Federal Reserve will extend
its full support and that
SWIFT, the international money
transfer network, also assured
of providing all the necessary
cooperation in recovering the
hacked money. The
Philippines returned $14.54
million in November 2016, so
$66.46 million has yet to be
retrieved. Now defendant RCBC
Bank of the Philippines has
hired the Quinn Emanuel law
firm to defend it, and it
already fighting back in
words. RCBC’s lead counsel on
the SDNY case, Tai-Heng Cheng,
said: “This is nothing
more than a thinly veiled PR
campaign disguised as a
lawsuit. Based on what we have
heard this suit is completely
baseless. If the Bank of
Bangladesh was serious about
recovering the money, they
would have pursued their
claims three years ago and not
wait until days before the
statute of limitations. Not
only are the allegations
false, they don’t have the
right to file here since none
of the defendants are in the
US." But it seems the funds
were transferred to and
through the Federal Reserve
Bank of New York. And as Inner
City Press reported in the US
v. Patrick Ho case last year,
the wiring of funds through
New York can confer
jurisdiction. Inner City Press
will be covering this case.
The first paragraph of the 103
page complaint reads, "This
litigation involves a massive,
multi-year conspiracy to carry
out one of the largest banks
heists in modern history right
here in New York City. On
February 4, 2016, thieves
reached into a bank account at
the Federal Reserve Bank of
New York (“New York Fed”) and
stole approximately $101
million (out of the nearly $1
billion they attempted to
steal). The bank account was
held for the benefit of
Bangladesh Bank, which is
Bangladesh’s Central Bank.
Bangladesh Bank has had a
45-year banking relationship
under which it has placed its
international reserves with
the New York Fed. The New York
Fed is a critical component of
the United States’ central
banking system and its link to
the international financial
system." Bangladesh's lawyers
on the case are "COZEN
O’CONNOR John J. Sullivan,
Esq. Jesse Loffler, Esq.
Yehudah Gordon, Esq." We'll
have more on this.
Debaprasad
Debnath, a general manager at
the central bank’s Financial
Intelligence Unit, Joint
Director Mohammad Abdur Rab
and Account and Budgeting
Department General Manager
Zakir Hossain all left Dhaka
to head to New York, for the
filing of the lawsuit, which
Inner City Press will be
following.
They say the
Federal Reserve Bank of New
York, which on January 29 was
instructed by the US State
Department to allow Juan
Guaido to access Venezuelan
accounts, will be helping its
Bangladeshi counterpart to get
to the bottom of the
hack. Those eyed include
Philippines’ Rizal Commercial
Banking Corporation or RCBC
and some of its officials, and
Philrem Service Corporation,
casino owners and
beneficiaries. Ajmalul Hossain
QC, a lawyer for the central
bank, is with them to file the
case.
It is an
interesting twist on the SDNY
as venue for the money
laundering and FCPA
prosecution of Patrick Ho of
CEFC for bribery in Chad and
to Uganda - in this case, too,
the money flowed through New
York. Inner City Press intends
to cover the case.
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
Box 20047, Dag Hammarskjold
Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2019 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|