In
Venezuela Sanctions Case Inner City Press
Push To Unseal, US Says Unsealing But
When?
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon Transcript
BBC
- Guardian
UK - Honduras
- ESPN
SDNY
COURTHOUSE, April 29–
Victor Mones Coro was charged
with brokering private
passenger air travel for
Tareck Zaidan El Aissami
Maddah - and like co-defendant
Michols Orsini Quintero was
given his discovery late by
the US, mixed with other DHS
info.
On March 31
Coro's lawyer posted to the
docket a notice "to the public
and counsel of record that two
sealed submissions... were
made by defendant Victor Mones
Coro." Inner City Press
immediately filed opposition,
docketed on April 1, quoted
below.
The US
Attorney's Office for the SDNY
was told to respond by April
9. When they did, they said
this:
"In what appears
to have been a coordinated
effort, on the same day,
Matthew Russell Lee of the
Inner City Press contacted the
Court by email and requested
the unsealing of several
sealed
documents."
On April
13, Inner City Press submitted
to the Court, and the US
Attorney's Office, the
opposition below.
On April 14,
Judge Hellerstein has ordered
the US Attorney's Office to
review and release or justify
redaction of the many filings
it put directly "into the
vault" in this case: "ORDER as
to Victor Mones Coro. On March
31, 2021, Inner Press City
filed an application to unseal
documents in the
above-captioned case. The
motion to unseal refers not
only to the Defendant's March
8 and March 22 submissions,
ECF Nos. 196, 198, but also to
documents heretofore sealed
and placed in clerk's vault.
ECF Nos. 1-5, 39, 63, 74,
90-100, 102-109, 120.
Recognizing the presumption in
favor of accountability and
the public filing of
documents, the Government is
hereby ordered to redact those
parts of the aforementioned
documents that, in its
opinion, deserve to be sealed
and give reasons for such
redactions by Friday, April
23, 2021. SO ORDERED. (Signed
by Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein
on 4/14/2021)."
Now on April 29,
the US Attorney's Office has
responded, with a partial
redacted letter which says it
is moving to unseal others -
but for every exhibit, it says
"Filed Under Seal." Letter
here. Watch this site.
From Inner City
Press' April 13 filing:
"Meaningful reply to the
Government's argument remains
difficult, as so much of it is
redacted. For example, on Page
1, four lines and two full
paragraphs after "During the
conference, the Court" are
redacted. The basis for
redacting the Government's
summary of or gloss on it is
unclear. Now
on April 13, Inner City Press
notes and specific requests
unsealing of the documents in
this case, including to the
degree they are not already
released (it is impossible to
compare the redacted letters
later released with the many
lines what say merely "SEALED
DOCUMENT placed in vault")
Docket Numbers 1 through 5,
39, 63, 74, 90-100, 102
through 109, 120, 196 and 198,
all listed as entirely
withheld. Inner City Press
immediately replied to this
statement in the Government
response:
"In what appears
to have been a coordinated
effort, on the same day,
Matthew Russel[l] Lee of the
Inner City Press contacted the
Court by email and requested
the unsealing of several
sealed
documents."
Inner City Press routinely
files requests to unseal in
this District, and other
Districts - including as cited
in its March 31 request: US v.
Weigand, 13-page order here.
Ascribing
ulterior motives to press
requests for transparency is a
hallmark of other regimes,
like the one the US Attorney's
Office claims to be so
concerned about in this
prosecution.
In the U.S., the presumption
of access is "based on the
need for federal courts... to
have a measure of
accountability and for the
public to have confidence in
the administration of
justice." US v. Amodeo,
71 F.3d 1044, 1048 (2d Cir.
1995)."
From Inner City
Press' March 31 request:
"These are clearly judicial
documents. And there is a
public interest in US
sanctions, on Venezuela and
elsewhere, and their
enforcement and violation and
all filings in such
cases. Mr.
Coro's counsel this evening
filed that "Notice is hereby
given to the public.. that two
sealed submissions, dated
March 8, 2021 and March 22,
2021, were made by the
defendant Victor Mones Coro."
Docket No. 194.
While appreciating the notice,
no legal argument justifying
withholding in full, rather
than redacting where
absolutely necessary was
provided. Inner City Press
hereby opposes the sealing,
and requests
unsealing.
Covering this for Inner City
Press, I have noted how many
filings are listed as sealed:
see, e.g., Docket 120
(10/13/20), and further back.
Compare, Judge Jed S. Rakoff's
request ruling on Inner City
Press' request in US v.
Weigand, viewable here."
On April 1,
U.S.
District Court
for the
Southern
District Judge
Alvin K.
Hellerstein
ordered a
response by April 9 - including
by the US
Attorney's
Office. Watch
this site.
Also in
the case has been Alejandro
Javier Marin, who plead guilty
on March 23 to a deal, only
one count of false statements
to Federal agents about
$140,000, see below.
On January
4, Mones Coro appeared before
Judge
Hellerstein to
plead guilty.
His lawyer
said there
were contacts
with
intelligence
service(s) but
that the issue
would come up
as mitigation
at sentencing,
which Inner
City Press
said it also
intended
to cover.
Now it
has.
On March
17, with Mones Coro up
for
sentencing, his lawyer
began to speak
of providing
information to
the US
intelligence
services. The
Assistant US
Attorney cut
in and said
this should be
under seal.
The phone line
went silent
as they went into
the robing
room.
Afterward
the AUSA
made reference
to what he'd
said in the robing
room. Mones Coro was
sentenced to
55 months, and
the US
Attorney's
Office put out
a press release,
with sealing
not mentioned, as it
was not in the
current Eaze trial in
which an
application by
Inner City
Press has
resulted in
some unsealing.
And here?
The March 24 guilty
plea of Marin
was a mystery.
Why only a
single count?
Even
the AUSA said
it was more
complicated.
Judge
Hellerstein asked
for the
discrepancy
between restitution
and forfeiture
to be addressed
prior to
sentencing.
There
are
other
discrepancies.
For example,
Judge
Hellerstein
said the plea
deal said
Marin is a Venezuelan
citizen who
will be
deported. But
he said he is
a US citizen;
for education he
mentioned
service in the
Venezuelan
Naval Academy.
We'll have
more on this.
On February
19, with
Michols Orsini
Quintero's
release to
home confinement
in Florida to
review the extensive
discovery
running out
mid March,
Judge
Hellerstein
held another
proceeding. Inner
City Press
covered it.
AUSA
Sam Adelsberg
pushed for
Orsini Quintero to
return to jail on
March 15.
Judge
Hellerstein
seemed to
agree, but told
defense lawyer
Sabrina
Shroff to
"make a record" for
his decision
or for
appeal. So expect
some
affidavits and
legal arguments.
Shroff
emphasized
that there is
not even a
trial date, and
that her
client was
only a pilot.
On
February 25,
Shroff wrote
to Judge
Hellerstein
requesting
modifications
of conditions
of bail, specifically to
receiving
mental health
evaluation
a
treatment, and
to attend a
house of
worship "as
religion and
God are a
source of
comfort for
Mr. Orsini."
And on
February 26,
Judge
Hellerstein
granted it:
"MEMO
ENDORSEMENT as
to Michols
Orsini
Quintero on
re: [183]
LETTER by
Michols Orsini
Quintero
addressed to
Judge Alvin K.
Hellerstein
from Sabrina
P. Shroff
dated February
25, 2021 re:
Modification
of conditions
of release.
ENDORSEMENT:
So Ordered.
(Signed by
Judge Alvin K.
Hellerstein on
2/26/2021)."
This
case is US v.
Coro,
19-cr-144
(Hellerstein)
Some
background: on November 10 in
the U.S. District Court for
the Southern District
Magistrates Court Alejandro
Marin, described as having
access to Venezuelan private
planes, El Aissami and
Venezuela's minister of
crypto-currency, was ordered
detained. It was not
announced, but Inner City
Press found it, and tweeted:
with no announcement in
advance, there is a defendant
in SDNY Magistrates Court that
DOJ is seeking to detain as a
flight risk, he flies private
plane and, AUSA says, knows
Venezuela's minister of
crypto-currency.
They kept
calling him Marin - quickly
seemed it was Alejandro
Marin, witness against
Venezuelans Vice President El
Aissami and his alleged
frontman, businessman Samark
Lopez - now accused of lying.
Inner City Press can report:
he is being ordered detained .
We said,
We'll have more on this. And
now we do. In Orsini
Quintero's counsel Sabrina
Shroff's letter dated December
10, she recounts that "On
December 8, 2020, the Court
ordered the government “to
produce by Thursday, December
10, 2020 at noon, at to both
defendants, its estimate of
probable applications of the
sentencing guidelines.” ECF
No. 153. Knowing full well the
difficulties the parties, the
Bureau of Prisons, and the
Court have scheduling remote
court appearances, and while
also cognizant of legal calls
can only be arranged 4 days in
advance, the government waited
until just 24 hours before the
bail argument to file its
substantive opposition to Mr.
Orsini Quintero’s bail motion.
Sadly, this type of
gamesmanship is typical of the
government’s conduct in this
case."
And at a
December 11 proceeding, there
was more gamesmanship. After
Judge Hellerstein said he was
going to grant Shroff's
request to free her client to
Florida to assist in his
defense, AUSA Sam Adelsberg
suddenly announced there is an
immigration detainer against
him.
Judge Hellerstein
said that could be address in
an order, since he would
retain jurisdiction. He asked
Shroff and Adelsberg to
finalize an order for him by
December 16.
On
December 15, Adelsberg filed a
proposed order, including that
"the defendant is temporarily
released for the preparation
of his defense, pursuant to 18
USC 3142(i) to the custody of
the Court's Pretrial Services
supervision arm, and shall not
be subject to the custody of
ICE for the duration of his
temporary release." It also
says he he must "refrain from
accessing the website of any
consulate or embassy."
Inner City
Press will continue to cover
this case -- Mones will now
have his (re-) pleading
proceeding by December 29.
Watch this site.
It is said that
Marin, a Confidential Source,
"repeatedly approached Mr.
Orsini Quintero's wife and
question her about her
husband's trial...The
Government merely had the same
agents who were handling the
CS ask the CS about these
concerns." Both then denied
them.
Marin told
his handlers, "Why is so
difficult to help to expedite
something that is eminient
[sic] like my citizenship?" He
arguably committed immigration
fraud. His adulterous
relationship are referred to,
followed by a redacted
sentence.
Now on November
24 from Judge Hellerstein,
this: "ORDER denying [140]
LETTER MOTION Sanctions for
late delivery of production,
and bail as to Michols Orsini
Quintero (4). The governments
late productions of Rule 16
and Brady and Giglio evidence
is not responsible for the
approximately 20 months of
defendants detention.
Defendant has not shown an
inability to process the
governments production while
remaining in detention, but
the court remains open to
applications for temporary
release under conditions
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3142
(i). Defendants motion for
bail is denied. The government
has shown by a preponderance
of the evidence that
defendants capabilities as a
pilot of chartered aircraft
make him a flight risk. I8
U.S.C. 3142(e); U.S. v.
English, 629 F.3D 311, 319 (2d
Cir. 2011).. (Signed by Judge
Alvin K. Hellerstein on
November 24, 2020)."
In
October, Judge Hellerstein
held a publicly-noticed
proceeding. Inner City Press
covered it.
It emerged
that AUSA Amanda Houle has
made ex parte sealed filings
with Judge Hellerstein, with
not a wisp of them in the
docket.
There was a
discussion of showing some but
not all of the information to
Orsini's lawyer, Sabrina
Shroff, on an "attorney's eyes
only" basis. Shroff, to her
credit, pushed back.
On October
28, Judge Hellerstein held
another proceeding after the
US Attorney's Office
late-produced some eight
terabytes of information, more
than double the volume it
produced before one of the
co-defendant pleaded guilty.
This is post the US v. Nejad
case Inner City Press has
reported on and in which it
anticipates making a filing -
watch this site.
While
Shroff is still digging
through the terabytes,
attorney Christine Chung
was mulling withdrawing
Victor Mones Coro's plea.
Mones moved to
withdraw the plea; the Court
accepted the withdrawal of
plea.
Now on
November 11, Mones has
requested sanctions, stating
that on October 25 the US
Attorney's Office turned over
a hard drive containing,
erroneously, "confidential
material regarding another
investigation that DHS had
mistakenly copied onto the
drive." We'll have more on
this.
In the interest
of increased transparency, here
is the October 28 transcript,
on Inner City Press'
DocumentCloud, here.
And Inner City
Press' filing to further
unseal in Nejad has been
docketed.
This case is US
v. Orsini Quintero, 19-cr-144
(Hellerstein)
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2021 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
|