| In Bard
Access Case Over Venous Catheter Pay
Closings Say No Extraction from 2nd Animal
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon Maxwell
Book
BBC
- Guardian
UK - Honduras
- ESPN
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
May 23 –
Bard Access Systems was sued
by 3DT Holdings LLC over a
venous catheter payment
dispute and a bench trial is
coming up.
On March
25, U.S. District Court for
the Southern District of New
York Judge Lewis J. Liman held
a pre-trial conference. Inner
City Press covered it.
Judge
Liman told the parties that
direct testimony will be in
writing, and only the cross
examination live in court.
Counsel asked if it might be
permitted to do the direct
examination live to, if only
for an audience of one.
Among the
"people, places and
institutions likely to be
mentioned" are the FDA,
Lucent, Poliac, NeoMatrix,
Eddie K. Burnside and a dozen
other individuals.
On May 20 in
advance of the May 23 bench
trial start date, another
conference was held and Inner
City Press covered it. Along
with scheduling matters - the
length of the lunch break,
when a guilty plea might be be
taken - the parties asked to
seal the courtroom.
The
response was that perhaps no
one would go to see the trial.
The parties both agreed not to
request - or allow? - a listen
only call in line for the
press and public, such as
existed in the Guo bench
trial.
On May 23,
witness Ghassan Kassab was on
the stand, being asked about
email chains about a bench
study, and an "animal
facility."
There were
four other
people in the
gallery, three
sitting right
next to each
other.
The emails involved Anthony
Misener, due to testify on May
24 -- there is a dispute about
Eddie K. Burnside on May 24 or
25.
On May 24, a
witness said he couldn't
remember if his meeting notes
were accurate. But they dealt
repeatedly with animal
studies, in February, March.
Into the docket when
counter-designations for
testimony of Ed Burnside.
On May 27, Bard
filed a motion to exclude or
disregard the testimony of
Wiley Thomas Waddall, saying
he used "unreliable,
speculative and untestable
methodologies."
On June 15 there
were closing arguments. On the
screen a slide including "no
viable evidence extracted from
the second animal." Now,
(bench trial) verdict watch.
Watch this site.
The case is 3DT
Holdings LLC v. Bard Access
Systems Inc., 17-cv-5463
(Liman)
***
Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a
month helps keep us going and grants you
access to exclusive bonus material on our
Patreon page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2022 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
|
,
