Inner City Press





In Other Media-eg New Statesman, AJE, FP, Georgia, NYTAzerbaijan, CSM Click here to contact us     .



These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis
,



Share |   

Follow on TWITTER

Home -

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis

CONTRIBUTE

(FP Twitterati 100, 2013)

ICP on YouTube

More: InnerCityPro

BloggingHeads.tv
Sept 24, 2013

UN: Sri Lanka

VoA: NYCLU

FOIA Finds  

Google, Asked at UN About Censorship, Moved to Censor the Questioner, Sources Say, Blaming UN - Update - Editorial

Support this work by buying this book

Click on cover for secure site orders

also includes "Toxic Credit in the Global Inner City"
 

 

 


Community
Reinvestment

Bank Beat

Freedom of Information
 

How to Contact Us



As NYC Plan to Pick Up Mentally Ill Homeless People Is Sued So Now SDNY Hearing Dec 12

By Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Maxwell book
BBC - Honduras - CIA Trial book - NY Mag

SDNY COURTHOUSE, Dec 10– As NYC gets colder, on December 8 law firms announced that

people with mental disabilities filed an emergency request to immediately halt NYC's  new policy to greatly expand coerced transport to psychiatric hospitals of people perceived to have “an inability to meet their basic needs.”  They said the motion for a temporary restraining order is brought in ongoing federal class action litigation challenging the City’s use of police officers as the front-line response to people with actual or perceived mental disabilities.  Earlier this year, the plaintiffs in Baerga v. City of New York challenged the NYPD’s role in the City’s response to people with actual or perceived mental disabilities, including the coercive detention and transportation of people by the police to psychiatric facilities for evaluation.    

   On December 9, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge in that case, Paul A. Crotty, ruled that he will hear the matter on December 12:   "ORDER on MOTION for Conference re: [108] Proposed Order to Show Cause With Emergency Relief and Motion to Strike Plaintiff's LETTER MOTION for Leave to File Opposition to Motion for Injunctive Relief Motion to Strike Application for Order to Show Cause or in the alternative to Convert Application for Order to Show Cause to Motion for Injunctive Relief and Set a Briefing; terminating [113] Letter Motion for Leave to File Document. Nevertheless, the Court declines the Defendants' request to strike Plaintiffs' requests. Instead, as a matter of efficiency, the Court converts the application to a motion for a preliminary injunction and a request for a premotion conference on discovery. The parties are further directed to confer regarding an expedited briefing schedule for both matters and a date for a preliminary injunction hearing. A pre-motion conference is set for December 12, 2022."

Inner City Press is covering the case.

It is Baerga v. City of New York et al, 21-cv-5762 (Crotty)

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

sdny

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA

Mail: Box 20047, Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540



Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2022 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com