Dershowitz
Bid for Maxwell Documents Opposed By 2 In
Camera Letters SDNY Update
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon Photo
thread
BBC
- Decrypt
- LightRead - Honduras
-
Source
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
Aug 31 – After the death of
Jeffrey Epstein in the MCC
prison, Virginia Giuffre,
Annie Farmer and others are
pursuing civil litigation for
sex trafficking against his
"madame" Ghislaine Maxwell and
his estate.
On
July 23 SDNY Judge Loretta
Preska read out ruling
unsealing many documents,
while Maxwell's lawyer asked
for a stay to appeal, citing
Maxwell's imprisonment and
July 2021 trial. Inner City
Press live tweeted it, below.
Now on
August 31 Judge Presksa has
provided an update:
"Nonparties were permitted to
submit comments on the
proposed disclosure to Mr.
Dershowitz no later than
August 25, 2020. (See dkt. no.
1104 in 15 Civ. 7433.) The
submissions were not numerous
by any measure. In total, the
Court received three
submissions from
nonparties--one of those
submissions, from nonparty
John Doe who has been actively
involved in the Maxwell
litigation, was filed on the
public docket (dkt. no. 1105
in 15 Civ. 7433), while the
other two submissions were
provided directly to the Court
by email for in camera review.
The comments submitted to the
Court on the proposed
disclosure to Mr. Dershowitz
covered three general tracks.
First, the comments noted the
gravity of the privacy and
reputational interests that
would be implicated by any
disclosure to Mr. Dershowitz.
For example, one Doe noted the
potential impact of any
disclosure on the mental
health of alleged victims of
Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse.
Second, and relatedly, the
comments argued that
nonparties reasonably relied
on the Maxwell protective
order when producing documents
or providing testimony in that
case and, accordingly,
expected that such materials
would remain confidential.
Third, the
comments suggested that Mr.
Dershowitz has not made a
showing that certain of the
sealed materials are relevant
to a degree sufficient to
justify any disclosure. The
Court will rule on (1) the
appropriateness of the
proposed disclosure to Mr.
Dershowitz and (2) the scope
of any disclosure to Mr.
Dershowitz at a later date."
On August 17
Judge Preska held a
conference, largely about
protective order and also
possible deposition of Les
Wexner. Inner City Press live
tweeted it:
Judge Preska: I
am well familiar with the
Maxwell case. Isn't the issue
you raise solved by seeking
leave in advance? Given the
problems we've had in Maxwell,
let's avoid extraneous
documents attached to motions.
Judge Preska: Is
there any reason what is
produced in this action should
have to be produced in the
state action?
Christian Kiely
for Dershowitz: We had agreed
to only take one deposition,
not two, for each. But they
made up file a motion to
compel. So, no.
Imran
Ansari (also for Dershowitz) -
we have a New York State
proceeding tomorrow... We
oppose a carte blanche
approach that is unfair to
Professor Dershowitz.
Judge Preska:
What if I consult with the NYS
Justice? Any objection?
No. No.
Judge Preska: Do you have his
number?
Ansari: I'll
email it to your chambers.
Judge Preska: On Mr. Wexner, I
propose that we wait.
A: There is close
to zero % change Mr. Wexner is
going to voluntarily agree to
be deposed.
A:
Professor Dershowitz is
entitled to depose Wexner to
memorialize the denial that
has been put in in a letter an
hour ago. [Inner City Press
tweeted a photographfrom that
letter, here.]
Judge Preska: I
must get to the issue. What
else do you want to talk
about, Counsel?
Nothing from the
defendant.
Judge Preska: I
will look for a protective
order tomorrow. Get on it.
Thanks for being on.
From July:
"Deposition of Virginia
Giuffre taken in the [STILL
REDACTED] matter on January
16, 2016, and designated by
Plaintiff as Confidential
under the Protective Order...
correspondence with Churcher
re: Edwards Privilege
communication." ..."Epstein
required Jane Doe #3 to have
sexual relations with [STILL
REDACTED] on numerous
occasions while she was a
minor... [STILL REDACTED]
would later play a significant
role in negotiating the NPA on
Epstein's behalf." [NPA =
Non-Prosecution
Agreement] With Sharon
Churcher of Mail on Sunday:
"Take the o out of favour!
Gives me away!!" And, "Whoever
published that article took
the phrase about Andrew
straight out of my captions.
Not cool!!"
"Maxwell had
direct connections to other
powerful individuals with whom
she could connect Epstein...
Prince Andrew. Jane Doe #3 was
forced to have sexual
relations with this Prince
when she was a minor"
Ghislaine Maxwell told you to
go give a massage to [STILL
REDACTED], correct?" A:
Correct.
"I was working at
Donald Trump's spa in
Mar-a-Lago and I was prompted
by Ghislaine to come to
Jeffrey's mansion in Palm
Beach that afternoon after
work to make some extra money
and to learn about massage"
"filed under seal
are Notices of Deposition and
Subpoena for [STILL REDACTED],
Joe Recarey and Michael
Reiter... certificate of
service for [STILL REDACTED]"
"The
Billionaire's Playboy Club,"
by Virginia Roberts... 'His
modeling agency was only
posing for an undercover
trade. His business was really
an illegal immigrant
trafficking ring of underage
girls that he was using as
escorts to make him uber
rich."
"you flew on a
helicopter with [STILL
REDACTED] and Ghislaine
Maxwell as the pilot? A:
Ghislaine told me that she
flew Bill Clinton in."
From: jeffrey E
<jeevaction [at]
http://gmail.com> To: Gmax
... holidays with people I
have never met, living off
trust funds that I have never
ever had"
Q: Do you know
the age of any girl that you
saw have sexual contact with
Ghislaine Maxwell? A: Well,
for instance, I mean, [STILL
REDACTED] was, I think, a year
older than me. [STILL
REDACTED] again, a few years
older than me."
"Alexandra Cousteau may have
knowledge concerning
Plaintiff's false claim
against Defendant and others"
- Alexandra Cousteau "has been
honored as an 'Earth trustee'
by the United Nations
Maria Alessi...
May have information about
Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey
Epstein's sexual trafficking
conduct... [STILL REDACTED]
may have information about
Ghislaine Maxwell's sexual
trafficking" - as do UN's Amir
Dossal & UNSC
Antonio Guterres
Watch this
site.
Before, Maxwell tried a
request for reconsideration.
Judge Preska denied it, but
gave two business days to for
Maxwell to appeal. Then a
notice of appeal to the Second
Circuit. Photos here.
From July 23:
Judge Preska: "Ms
Maxwell refused to testify as
to any consensual adult
activity." Ms Maxwell as
relied on little but ipse
dixit [it is said] - there is
a presumption of public access
to these motions. Those papers
shall be unsealed
Judge
Preska: Personal identifying
information, and names of
non-parties other than Doe 1
and Doe 2, will be redacted...
Docket 142-2, unseal. Same
thing for 144-5, 144-6 and
144-7.
Judge
Preska: Unseal docket 150
[Declaration of Jeffrey S.
Pagliuca - this was filed,
under seal, on May 10,
2016. [Inner City Press
note: UN official Amir Dossal,
SG @AntonioGuterres '
head of "Partnerships," was
with Maxwell's Terrarmar up to
2018 filings...
Judge Preska:
185-11, excerpts of Giuffre
declaration... 185-13, Giuffre
affidavit, unseal in full...
Billionaire's Club draft -
unseal... Some others:
withholding pending notice to
that Doe
Judge
Preska: 260-1... Will, if this
only the authorization? "Will"
- that first two pages. Judge
Preska: Medical records to
remain sealed... I will
ask you to confer and prepare
the documents, posting them
within a week. Maxwell lawyer:
We want a stay to appeal
Maxwell
lawyer: We want a two week
stay. Giuffre's lawyer: We
want it released right away.
Maxwell lawyer: There's been a
chance - Ms. Maxwell as been
indicted and awaits trial in
another courtroom in the SDNY
in July 2021. We are concerned
about a fair trial
Judge Preska:
I'll give you a week to
prepare the motion. I'll still
ask you to prepare to make the
documents public. If the 2d
Circuit does not take up or
grant your motion in a week,
let me know. But prepare to
unseal.
On
July 2 Acting US Attorney
Audrey Strauss has announced
and unsealed in indictment of
Maxwell on charges including
sex trafficking and perjury.
(As in the Schulte CIA leaks
case, it is not yet clear
where the grand jury sat,
White Plains or Manhattan with
virtual jurors). Many hope
that the sex trafficking
prosecutions will move on to
the UN, where Maxwell held a
ghoulish press conference, and
where Antonio Guterres is now
covering up both UN sexual
exploitation by peacekeepers
the UN moves in and out of
countries with impunity, scoop
video here,
and sexual abuse right inside
UN headquarters, exclusive
audio here.
Watch this site.
On June
10, Maxwell filed that
"Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell,
through her counsel and
pursuant to this Court’s Order
and Protocol for Unsealing
Decided Motions, DE 1044, as
clarified by DE 1053, objects
to the unsealing of the Sealed
Items contained in: • DE 143
(and related DEs 142, 144,
144-1, 149, 150, 150-1, 151,
152, 153, and 153- 1); • DE
172 (and related DEs 171, 173,
173-1, 189, 190, 190-1, 202,
203, 204-1, 211, 212, 212-1,
and 224) and; • DE 199 (and
related DEs 200, 200-1, 228,2
29, 229-1, 284, 249, and
249-1)." Photo here.
It is
reminiscent of UN Sec-Gen
Antonio Guterres covering
up UN child rapes -
except the UN's rapes are in
DR Congo, CAR and Haiti. And
now, this
in Tel Aviv, another Inner
City Press scoop on which
Guterres refuses to answer.
And on July 1,
this order: "MEMORANDUM &
ORDER re: (133 in
1:19-cv-03377-LAP) FIRST
LETTER MOTION for Local Rule
37.2 Conference addressed to
Judge Loretta A. Preska from
Howard M. Cooper, Esq. dated
June 12, 2020, filed by Alan
Dershowitz. For the reasons
discussed above: (1) Cooper
& Kirk shall destroy (a)
all materials from Giuffre v.
Maxwell, No. 15 Civ. 7433,
currently in its possession,
save for the transcript of Ms.
Giuffre's deposition in that
case and (b) all work product
derived from the Maxwell
materials. Cooper & Kirk
shall submit to the Court an
affidavit detailing the steps
that it took to destroy the
materials. In addition, to the
extent it is doing so, Cooper
& Kirk shall cease all use
of the Maxwell
materials--outside of Ms.
Giuffre's deposition
transcript--in its work on Ms.
Giuffre's action against Mr.
Dershowitz. (2) Mr.
Dershowitz's request to modify
the Maxwell Protective Order
[dkt. no. 133 in 19 Civ. 3377]
is denied. SO ORDERED. (Signed
by Judge Loretta A. Preska on
7/1/2020)."
Judge Schofield said she does
not see lumping in the
complaint, and that does not
think that the motion or
motions Ghislaine Maxwell was
suggesting she would make
would be worth the
time.
Maxwell's lawyer
Laura Menninger of Denver's
Haddon, Morgan and Foreman,
P.C. was urged to submitted a
letter or answer in a week's
time. Menninger
pushed forward, saying that
given the case's link to New
Mexico and that Farmer is not
a resident of New York, the
shorter of the statute of
limitation might apply.
Judge
Schofield repeated that the
defendants, also for executors
of Epstein's estate Darren K.
Indyke and Richard D. Khan,
should file in a week's time.
Inner City Press will continue
to follow and report on this
case. It is Farmer v. Indyke,
et al, 19-cv-10475
(Schofield).
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2020 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|