Biden
and Garland Seeking Death Penalty In West
Side Highway Terrorism Trial of Saipov
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon Thread
Honduras
- The
Source - The
Root - Podcast
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
Sept 16 – Sayfullo Saipov has
been facing a trial that may
result in the death penalty
for killing eight people with
a van along the West Side
Highway.
On May 4
U.S. District Court for the
Southern District of New York
Judge Vernon S. Broderick held
a conference on the case and
Inner City Press live tweet it
here
and below.
On
September 16,
this from
the prosecutors:
"Re: United
States v.
Sayfullo
Habibullaevic
Saipov, S1 17
Cr. 722 (VSB)
Dear Judge
Broderick: The
Court has
previously
requested
updates on the
status of the
defendant’s
request to the
Attorney
General to
withdraw the
Notice of
Intent to Seek
the Death
Penalty in
this case.
(Dkt. No. 80).
We were
notified today
that the
Attorney
General has
decided to
continue to
seek the death
penalty. We
conveyed this
decision to
defense
counsel and
the victims."
Letter on
Inner City Press'
DocumentCloud
here.
This
comes days
before the UN
General
Assembly week,
on a day US
Ambassador to
the UN Linda Thomas-Greenfield
said the Biden
administration
is all about
promoting UN
principles.
But those
include no
death penalty.
And USUN
has done nothing
to stop the UN
from banning
Press. We'll
have more on
this.
On
August 25 the
Federal
Defenders
alleged
massive Brady
disclosure
violations by
DOJ,
including
evidence "that
he was
influenced by
others who
share
culpability
yet they are
not being prosecuted,
much less facing
the death
penalty." They
want a
hearing.
On
August 29 the
Federal Defenders
wrote in
again, now demanding
that the
October 11
trial be
postponed.
They
say the new
document
show or go to that
Saipov "was
radicalized or
perhaps even
groomed by a
network of
Uzbek
extremists."
Inner
City Press
will continue
to follow
and report on
this
case.
Along with
discussion of jury selection
procedures and a pending
request by Federal Defenders
to deauthorize the use of the
death penalty, the issue of
Saipov's desire for a battery
for his clock radio, or a hand
cranked radio arose. Also,
that he (or his lawyers) want
only vaccinated jurors. Thread.
On September 12,
Judge Broderick granted the
request for vaxed-only jurors,
and more: "ORDER as to
Sayfullo Habibullaevic
Saipov... Accordingly, it is
hereby ORDERED that an
individual may not be seated
as a juror in the
above-captioned case unless at
least two weeks have passed
since the individual's second
dose in a two-dose series,
such as the Pfizer-BioNTech
and Moderna vaccines, or at
least two weeks have passed
since the individual's
single-dose J&J/Janssen
vaccine. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
that, notwithstanding any
courthouse policies to the
contrary, all individuals in
the courtroom during the trial
in the above-captioned case
must wear masks, except for
witnesses while testifying and
counsel when questioning from
the podium. IT IS FURTHER
ORDERED that, notwithstanding
any courthouse policies to the
contrary, jurors must wear
masks in the jury room unless
eating or drinking, in which
case, jurors are directed to
remain at least six feet
apart. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
that everyone must otherwise
abide by all COVID protocols
in place for the courthouse.
SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge
Vernon S. Broderick on
9/12/22)."
On August 23,
Judge Broderick docketed his
disclosure to the parties:
"ORDER as to Sayfullo
Habibullaevic Saipov. On
August 20, 2022, potential
juror #943 left a voicemail
with my Chambers. I have
notified the parties of this
voicemail, and provided a copy
to them. Accordingly, it is
hereby ORDERED that the
parties can take the voicemail
into consideration when
evaluating potential juror
#943 for service. SO ORDERED.
(Signed by Judge Vernon S.
Broderick on 8/23/22)." If in
cases like US v. Ghislaine
Maxwell juror questionnaire
information is made public,
why not this voicemail, so the
public can understand?
Back on
August 3, 2022, this: "ORDER
as to Sayfullo Habibullaevic
Saipov. On July 29, 2022, I
ordered that the parties
appear for a conference on
August 10, 2022, at 4:00 p.m."
Inner City Press
live tweeted it, here.
Back on June 3,
Judge Broderick held another
conference and Inner City
Press live tweeted it, here
and below.
The upshot?
Federal Defenders do not want
to travel to Uzbekistan
despite a State Department
authorization. And they want
to wait to see if new Attorney
General Garland issues a
policy against seeking the
death penalty. It was strongly
implied that Saipov would
plead guilty to life without
parole. Podcast here.
On August 6 the
US wrote to Judge Broderick
that depositions in Uzbekistan
in the Fall of 2021 would be
fine. But Saipov's Federal
Defenders said not so fast,
the government there wants to
sit in and anyway, new SDNY
COVID policy amid the Delta
variant will not allow enough
jurors. They note that "over
50 countries are currently at
Level 4 of the State
Department's travel advisory,
including the UK, Ireland,
Greece, the Kyrgyz Republic,
Portugal, Cuba, South Africa,
the BVI, the Maldives and the
Netherlands."
On August 12,
Judge Broderick sided with the
defense on this: "ENDORSEMENT:
Given the low vaccination rate
in Uzbekistan and the rising
COVID-19 infection rate, I
find that it is premature to
schedule Rule 15 depositions
at this time. Within 30 days,
the parties should file a
joint status letter updating
me on their discussions
regarding alternate locations
for the depositions and the
protocol that will be used.
The parties should inform me
whether any of the countries
proposed by defense counsel
are viable options. The
parties are also directed to
update me within 30 days
regarding defendant's
potential deauthorization
request."
Previously at a
court appearance on November
18 before U.S. District Court
for the Southern District of
New York Judge Vernon S.
Broderick, after his Federal
Defender inquired into Saipov
receiving dental care, Saipov
told Judge Broderick he had no
right to judge him.
As Inner City Press recounted
moments later outside the
courthouse on Pericope here,
Saipov asked Broderick, What
about the thousands or
millions of Muslims killed by
American bombs?
Judge
Broderick replied, I am just
the referee, it is the jury
that will judge you. And it
emerged, that jury might be
anonymous and/or
semi-sequestered.
Much
of the November 20 conference,
delayed by problems with the
sound system for the Uzbek
interpreter, concerned how the
jury will be selected. Some
3000 questionnaires will be
mailed out, asking potential
jurors about hardship but not
disclosing what the case is
about.
Judge
Broderick said, with response
rates to such summons being
being 30%, perhaps it was
better to spring more
information on the prospect
once they were in court.
Federal Defender alluded to an
"incident" in which
unspeficied inappropriate
language was used; Judge
Broderick responded but left
the issue murky. Then Saipov
asked to speak, and did. The
case is US
v. Saipov, 17-cr-722
(Broderick)
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2019 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|