Inner City Press





In Other Media-eg New Statesman, AJE, FP, Georgia, NYTAzerbaijan, CSM Click here to contact us     .



These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis
,



Share |   

Follow on TWITTER

Home -

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis

CONTRIBUTE

(FP Twitterati 100, 2013)

ICP on YouTube

More: InnerCityPro

BloggingHeads.tv
Sept 24, 2013

UN: Sri Lanka

VoA: NYCLU

FOIA Finds  

Google, Asked at UN About Censorship, Moved to Censor the Questioner, Sources Say, Blaming UN - Update - Editorial

Support this work by buying this book

Click on cover for secure site orders

also includes "Toxic Credit in the Global Inner City"
 

 

 


Community
Reinvestment

Bank Beat

Freedom of Information
 

How to Contact Us



Psycho Teddy Has Case Dismissed Under Shrink Wrap Agreement By SDNY Judge Rakoff Dicta Here

By Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon
BBC - Guardian UK - Honduras - The Source

SDNY COURTHOUSE, April 30 – Eliot Stein sued Google d/b/a YouTube for hosting videos allegedly infringing his copyright to the character PSYCHO TEDDY. 

   Google wanted it removed to California under what on April 20 U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Jed S. Rakoff called a "shrink-wrap agreement."

   He said, in dicta, that this was no real agreement, no meeting of the minds, no activity of the mind at all. But it is the law, he said.   

Judge Rakoff concluded, Plaintiff, you have my equitable support. But I think I have to dismiss the case, without prejudice to it being refiled in California.

   The defense of Google, by Quinn Emanuel, said, We agree that is the right outcome under the law.    

Judge Rakoff: I'll issue a short order later today.

And he did: "For the reasons stated at today's telephonic hearing, see transcript, April 30, 2020, the above-captioned case is dismissed without prejudice on the ground that it is required to be filed, if at all, in the state or federal courts of Santa Clara County, California. The Court therefore does not reach the remaining grounds for dismissal set forth in the defendant's motion to dismiss."

The case is, or was, Stein v. Google, LLC, 20-cv-00528 (Rakoff).

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA

Mail: Box 20047, Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540



Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2020 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com for