Goldman Sachs Was Sued For
Gender Pay Gap In 2010 Still Complaining of
Class Counsel's Communications
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon
BBC
- Guardian
UK - Honduras
- The
Source
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
May 6 – Goldman Sachs was sued
in 2010 for unequal pay to
women. Fully a decade later on
May 6, 2020 the lawyers were
bickering about class
counsel's communications to
women at Goldman.
It was a
telephone proceeding before
U.S. District Court for the
Southern District of New York
Magistrate Judge Robert W.
Lehrburger and Inner City
Press covered it.
Sullivan
& Cromwell, representing
Goldman, had argued that
"co-lead counsel's
unauthorized communications
circumvent the Order, which
thrice direct the parties to
'meet and confer and submit to
the Court a proposed form and
method of notice' to Equity
Award recipients."
Before Judge Lehrburger they
sniped - the Judge's word - at
each other, until plaintiffs'
counsel agreed communications
could be shown in advance to
the Judge, in camera - without
Goldman and its counsel seeing
or pre-approving them.
Ten
years is a long time. A
decision is
expected. The case
is Chen-Oster, et al. v.
Goldman Sachs & Co., et
al, 10-cv-6950 (Torres /
Lehrburger).
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2019 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|