In Other Media-eg New Statesman, AJE, FP, Georgia, NYT,  Azerbaijan, CSM Click here to contact us     .

By Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon
BBC - Guardian UK - Honduras - ESPN

SDNY COURTHOUSE, Oct 12 – New York City public school teachers, facing suspension without pay if they do not get the COVID-19 vaccine, sought a Temporary Restraining Order against the mandate.

They lost on October 5 - and now again before the assigned District Judge Valerie E. Caproni. Inner City Press live tweeted here:

Judge Caproni: On the record before me I cannot find that these plaintiffs have standing... because there is a collective bargaining process, as Judge Vyskocil said. The issue was flagged for them but plaintiffs' counsel did not address it, inexplicably.

 Judge Caproni: I will order supplemental briefing on the issue of standing. I am denying the requested TRO and preliminary injunction.

Judge Caproni: While  NYMayor  deBlasio  may have been quoted that the religious exemption [to vaccination] might be limited to Seventh Day Adventists and Christian Scientists, BoE has in fact given exemptions to adherents of 20 religions, see Bernstein Declaration.

  On October 5 U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil held a TRO hearing. Inner City Press covered it. 

  Judge Vyskocil questioned why the teachers had waited until after the mandate was in effect before seeking a restraining order; she noted they had yet to serve the defendants, including NYC Health Commissioner David Chokshi. 

 While acknowledging that the religious exemption belatedly added by an arbitrator might raise Constitution issues, Judge Vyskocil denied the TRO. She noted other similar cases pending before the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.

  The religious exemption, the plaintiffs' TRO memo says, is "blatantly discriminatory" in that "requests must be 'documented in writing' by a  religious official (i.e. clergy) and 'shall be denied where the leader of the religious organization has spoken public in favor of the vaccine, or where the documentation is readily available (e.g., from an online source), or where the objection is personal, political or philosophical in nature."

This comes as at least one pastor has offered to sign exemption letters if a person will come to and presumably contribute to his church. Still, the language seems to invite challenge. Judge Vyskocil questioned whether it could be considered a government act, since it was a private agreement before an arbitrator.

This case will have a status conference before SDNY Judge Caproni on October 12 at 11 am.

The case is Kane et al. v. de Blasio et al., 21-cv-7863 (Caproni)

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA

Mail: Box 20047, Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540

Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2021 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com