| Patterson
Told ACS His Daughter Was Being Sex
Trafficked Phone Dies Mid Rant to Rakoff
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon
BBC
- Decrypt
- LightRead - Honduras
-
Source
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
May 15 -- Maurice Patterson
pled guilty in January 2011 to
selling 50 grams and more of
crack before Judge Jed S.
Rakoff the U.S. District Court
for the Southern District of
New York.
He
reappeared nine years later on
February 21, 2020 in a
Violation of Supervised
Release hearing that lasted
until 7 pm, also before Judge
Rakoff. Inner City Press was
the only media there as
Patterson's text messages to
his daughter telling her to
s*ck his d*ck were
described.
But this time
Maurice Patterson had a white
show law firm lawyer, a
sometime CJA, Rita Glavin of
Seward & Kissel. And with
a team of three others
including Brian Paul Maloney
and Sareen Karla Armani, she
made arguments Judge Rakoff
called interesting, including
that harassment in the second
degree -- that is, telling ASC
the mother of his daughter was
sex trafficking her -- is not
in fact a crime for purposes
of the Federal Supervised
Release
provisions.
On May 15
Patterson appeared, by cell
phone, for sentencing. He
asked to speak for himself,
saying, Rita, Rita, let me
talk. He said the mother of
his daughter has another man
in jail on false rape claims.
He dropped an F-bomb, then
said, "Rakoff, listen to me."
Then his phone cut off.
During the
wait for Patterson to call
back in, Judge Rakoff said at
4 pm he would be "sitting" on
the Ninth Circuit Court of
Appeals by designation. Unlike
many others might, especially
in UN-world, Judge Rakoff did
not pull rank, did not protest
at the defendant speaking for
himself or cut him off. So a
date for the next week was
selected. Inner City Press
will continue to cover this
case.
Back
in February a written
submission was requested of
the government on that, while
Glavin traveled to the Bahamas
for some type of legal
conference. Inner City Press
in 2019 inquired, including
directly to Glavin, how it was
possible to represent the
government in one case in the
SDNY and those charged by the
government in other cases,
even if they waive
it. Apparently
David Patton of Federal
Defenders has said that merely
reciting the conflict of
interest, and having it
dismissed by judges, is
enough. But some conflicts are
just conflict. Still, we will
continue to cover this
interesting case. It is US v.
Patterson, 10-cr-94
(Rakoff).
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2020 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|
,
