In Columbia Dirty Doc Hadden
Case March 28 Trial As Civil Case Moves To
Settlement Talks
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon Video Photo
BBC
- Guardian
UK - Honduras
- ESPN
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
Jan 10 – Columbia University
doctor Robert A. Hadden was
hit on September 9, 2020 with
a Federal indictment charging
that "sexually abused dozens
of female patients, including
multiple minors, under the
guise of conducting purported
gynecological and obstetric
examinations."
The case was
assigned to U.S. District
Court for the Southern
District of New York Judge
Richard M. Berman, who handled
the case of Jeffrey Epstein
until he died in the
Metropolitan Correctional
Center. Epstein
came up during the bail
argument, which Hadden won.
Inner City Press live tweeted
it, below.
On January 11,
2022, SDNY Magistrate Judge
Katharine H. Parker held a
proceeding in a related civil
case. Columbia and other
defendants have agreed to pay
$79 million to some of the
plaintiffs, but others remain:
131 potential class members,
and five representatives.
These five will be at a
settlement conference Judge
Parker is convening for March
23, 2022 - five days before
Hadden's criminal trial. This
civil case is Hoechstetter et
al v. Columbia University et
al., 19-cv-2978 (Carter /
Parker)
Back on
July 14, Judge Berman docketed
a letter the US had filed,
with a full paragraph
redacted, that it will seek a
superseding indictment on
another count of enticement,
regarding an adult Victim-6.
Letter on Inner City Press'
DocumentCloud here.
On August
2, Hadden's publicly funded
(for now) counsel filed a
series of motions, with
redactions, citing Evelyn Yang
and request dismissal of the
case. It mentioned Evelyn
Yang's interview then redacts
a two line sentence. Then,
"Andrew Yang public a
statement, this media
attention led to outrage
regarding the 'lenient'
sentence Mr. Hadden had
received in the DANY
Prosecution." Yes.
On December 15,
2021, Judge Berman held a
proceeding and Inner City
Press live tweeted it here
(podcast here)
in Day 3 of 3
hiatus in Ghislaine Maxwell
trial, now another sexual
exploitation case, Columbia's
"Dirty Doc" Hadden
Judge
Berman (joining the proceeding
after a meeting): If you want
to have some additional
argument, I'm happy to hear
that. Defense lawyer: We
believe an evidentiary hearing
is appropriate. There was been
more than normal cooperation
between the two prosecutors
AUSA Kim:
Defendant has failed to
justify any sort of
evidentiary hearing. It's all
speculation. There are
numerous cases where there has
been a Federal prosecution
after a state case. [Uh, like
US Attorney Alex Acosta
sending Epstein case back to
the state?]
Judge
Berman: I'm far along with my
draft. I'll include today's
comments. I can have a written
ruling by 4 pm today. [Inner
City Press will report on that
as well.]
Hadden's 2d
lawyer, Federal Defender
Deirdre D. Von Dornum: We
would like oral argument on
our motion to suppress. Judge
Berman: I could hear it right
now. I have the time. Von
Dornum: Some of it should not
be public. [Oh, that again.]
Judge Berman: In
January we have a lot of
pre-trial scheduling to
accomplish. We start our trial
on March 28. For the moment
there are only a limited
number of court room where
jury trials can take place.
[Because COVID. Hadden has a
call-in line. Why not Maxwell?
Judge
Berman: We have another
request, that came in
yesterday, requesting a jury
questionnaire. AUSA Kim:
We oppose the questionnaire,
and believe the Court can
effectively preside over voir
dire. We'll file by Tuesday,
Dec 21.
Judge Berman: I'd
thought Monday Judge Berman:
We'll need an hour at least
for oral argument. It'll be
January 5. And jury selection
March 28. Adjourned.
Back on
September 9, 2020 close to 10
pm, Hadden emerged from
Pre-Trial then the courthouse.
Inner City Press and three
others sought to ask him
questions, about the victims'
statements and double
jeopardy. He did not answer. A
man in an FBI t-shirt led him
first up Mulberry Street, then
past the NYC criminal court at
100 Centre Street and finally
out to Broadway and Reade
Street where a taxi was
waiting for Hadden. Periscope
video here.
SDNY Acting
US Attorney Audrey Strauss
held a press conference about
the case on September 9.
Inner City
Press asked her if the
indictment had been returned
by a fully in-person grand
jury, or if it had included a
virtual component of the type
being questioned in the CIA /
Joshua Schulte, Melzer, Balde
and other cases.
US
Attorney Strauss said the
indictment was returned in the
normal course, by a sitting
grand jury. Periscope video here.
Alamy photo here.
She declined to say
whether her office would be
seeking detention pending
trial, or agreeing to a bail
package as they did in the
recent case of indicted UN
rapist Karim Elkorany.
There was no
mention at the press
conference for the charges
against Hadden made publicly
by Evelyn Yang, the wife of
Andrew Yang, and not much
mention of Manhattan DA Cyrus
Vance.
Hours later, a
bail proceeding before SDNY
Magistrate Judge Robert
Lehrburger (and not the
Magistrate on duty on
September 8, Barbara Moses).
Inner City Press live tweeted
it:
Speaking for the
US is AUSA Maurene Comey...
Judge
Lehrburger: We are proceeding
under the CARES Act. This is
open to the press and public.
Any recording is
prohibited. Hadden's lawyer:
We are only representing him
for this proceeding
Judge
Lehrburger: You have the right
to remain silent... You have a
right to be released unless I
find danger to the community
or risk of non-appearance for
future court
proceedings. [Note:
Ghislaine Maxwell was found a
risk of flight]
Judge Lehrburger:
You are charged with six
counts of Enticement and
Inducement to Travel To Engage
In Illegal Sex Acts. Hadden's
lawyer enters not guilty plea.
AUSA Maurene Comey: The
government seeks detention as
risk of flight.
AUSA Comey:
Today, the government has
communicated with 20 victims.
They all say he should be
detained. He has the financial
means to flee. Because of the
minor victim, there is a
statutory presumption of
detention that cannot be
overcome.
AUSA Comey:
He abused dozens of victims,
including multiple minors, as
prominent institution's
[Columbia U] OB-GYN. He would
sent nurses out of the room.
[Did they ever report it?]
AUSA Comey: He
conducted unneeded breast
exams. He touched genitals
without any medical purpose.
He attempted to stimulate
them, to gratify himself. For
two decades. One victim, he
had delivered as a baby
AUSA Comey: The
women traveled to see him
because he worked at a
prominent institution. [What
about Columbia?]
The case is
US v. Hadden, 20-cr-468
(Berman).
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2021 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
|