In
Adidas Case Marty Blazer Gets
Time Served While Still No
Prosecution of Nike in SDNY
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon, thread
SDNY
COURTHOUSE, Feb 6 – While
the US
Attorney for
the Southern
District of
New York urged
and got
"time served"
leniency
for Adidas "black
ops" operative Thomas
Gassnola and then
on September
12 for briber turned
government
witness Munish
Sood, on
October 4
Merl
Code got a three
month
sentence,
consecutive to
his other
six
months.
Meanwhile on
Nike? Nothing.
On
February
6, the
Assistant US
Attorney Boone
urged leniency
under Section
5K1.1 for
Martin Blazer,
cooperator.
Judge Edgardo
Ramos inquired
about the size
of restitution,
then imposed or
granted a
sentence of
time served,
albeit with
one year of
Supervised
Release, restitution
of $1,560,000 and forfeiture
of $2.35
million. Inner City
Press ran back
down to the
Nike /
Avenatti trial,
wondering when
if ever the US
Attorney's
Office will
prosecute
anyone in the
Nike scandal,
of payments to
Deandre Atyon
and Bol Bol.
Watch
this site.
As the
SDNY winds
down, and
Kansas' Bill
Self said
there is not
reason to
pursue him
even for the
administrative
violation of
failures
to supervise,
"his"
gym the
Allen
Fieldhouse
hosted a Late
Night in the
Phog midnight
madness event
with pole
dancing, a money
gun and Snoop
Dogg. So which
is it - is Bill
Self supervising,
and
responsible
for this (as
he denies),
or is he not supervising? And
others in the
outer orbits
of the college
basketball
bribery
scandal are
relaxing,
slipping away.
Not as
much immunity
as the SDNY
prosecutors
left in the
United Nations
after two convictions
of the bribers
but not the
bribees, but
almost.
On September
12 in
an
ill-attended
sentencing
before SDNY
Judge Kimba
Wood, Sood was
all smiles.
The only issue
may be
restitution
and even that
is not clear.
Judge Woods
asked the
prosecutors to
get her the
transcripts or
pleading from
the proceedings
before Judge Lewis
Kaplan.
The
government's
sentencing
submission
under Section
5K1.1 says
among other
things that
"Sood gave
Evans $2,000
in recognition of
Evans having
arranged the
meeting for
Sood with Player-1's
mother." But
it downplays
his role in
the University of
Louisville
scam,
emphasizing
that Sood only
came in
later. We hope to
have more on
this. For now, more
on Patreon here.
There is a
continuum of focus on the
Office of the U.S. Attorney
for the Southern District of
New York, ranging down from
investigations of Donald Trump
through this coming week's
narrowing NCAA
basketball corruption trial
down to the extremely narrow
prosecution of only Patrick Ho
for United Nations
bribery.
While rarely
viewed together, there is a
pattern here, examined
below. On the morning of May 6
Christian Dawkins' attorney
Steve Haney played audio clips
and said they showed Dawkins
may have paid players and
their families but did not pay
coaches. Rather, he just took
Jeff D'Angelo's money. Haney
urged the jury, to begin
deliberating later in the day,
NOT to get on Jeff D'Angelo's
yacht but rather to say bon
voyage to his, a government
agent, and the government's
case. There was Merl Code in a
conversation on wire tap about
taking D'Angelo's money by
taking up to Madison Square
Garden to meet Melo and
Porginzis, and a reference (in
the transcript) to "[U/I]
Williamson." Can you say,
Zion?
On the afternoon
of May 3 On the morning of May
3 Assistant
U.S. Attorney
Noah
Solowiejczyk
ran out the
clock until 2
pm, pushing
the defense
summations
back until May
6.
Solowiejczyk
showed
exhibits about
"taking care
of the moms"
of Jahvon
Quinerly,
admitted that
Marty Blazer
is a convicted
fraudster and
closed by
accusing Merl
Code of
"conscious
avoidance."
The defense
projected
using two
hours, then
the final U.S.
statement in
45 monhts or
less. Earlier
on May 3 Judge
Edgardo Ramos read his charge
to the jury, omitting the
state law of Oklahoma and
California (of Tony Bland).
Then Assistant U.S. Attorney Solowiejczyk
called
Christian
Dawkins a
liar, playing
audio
that he and
Preston Murphy
DID spoke
about a Marcus,
Marcus Foster
who played for
Creighton, not
the Marcus
Phillips
Dawkins (he
said) made up
making up. The back
of the
courtroom was
full of other
Assistant
U.S.
Attorneys,
either
cheering or
learning; they
are sure to go
over this one.
Was the
strategy of
defending or
objecting to
the exposure
of the wider
corruption of
college
basketball in
order to increase
the odds of
convicting
Dawkins and
Merl Code the
right one? Is so,
for whom? They've
done it on the
UN, and the
corruption
continues.
On
the morning of May 2,
Christian Dawkins was still on
the stand, telling the jury
how the value to him of
Assistant Coach Book
Richardson was sending him NBA
veterans; he said "Book is
going to send me kids anyway."
The government objected to
mentions of Sean Miller paying
prospects, or "kids." Inner
City Press was told there had
been no mention of any
unsealing of sidebar
transcripts, a topic on which
we may have more.
On May 1 Inner
City Press
went to cover
the charging
conference in
Courtroom 619
of 4 Foley
Square. There,
significantly,
the state laws
of Oklahoma
and California
(read, Tony
Bland of USC)
were dropped
from the
charge; South
Carolina
(Lamont Evans)
and Arizona
remain. While
quite civil, a
majority of
defense
proposals by
Allen Cheney
were
overruled, in
most cases in
favor of
previously
used language
or at the
insistence of
Assistant US
Attorney Noah
Solowiejczyk.
It remains
unclear if
Merl Code will
take the
stand, and
therefore if a
conscious
avoidance
charge might
be needed, and
how it might
be worded. The
parties agreed
that the
charge should
be read before
their closing
statements,
which will be
pushed back at
least until
Friday, with
other issues
pending.
Earlier on May 1,
defendant Christian Dawkins
told the jury among other
things that the approach of
paying college coaches was not
the most effective way, since
NBA prospects essentially
already have agents by the
time they show up for their
one year of college. It's not
even a full year: Dawkins said
that the moment the team is
eliminated from March Madness,
the "one and done" prospect
leaves school. See @SDNYLIVE
here, a response.
On
April 30 government
cooperating witness Munish
Sood was asked about his
motives: to avoid a $750,000
fine and being charged with
lying to FBI agents, which
charged the defense argued
would normally not be forgiven
by "the Southern District of
New York," meaning the
prosecutors not the court.
The
government objected to a
question for Sood's net worth,
and Judge Edgardo Ramos
sustained the objection.
Sood's previous role in a bank
in New Jersey came up, without
the bank being named. Inner
City Press reports that it was
First Choice Bank, which was
bought by Berkshire Bank whose
checks Sood later used for
bribes. Notably, Berkshire
Bank has removed from its
website the page about its
purchase of First Choise Bank,
and Sood's services, for $117
million. But still online is
their press release of a deal
with Sood's Princeton Advisory
Group, here...
On April
29 at
2:30 pm
after
Sood quoted defendant
Christian
Dawkins that directly
paying
players and
deal with
their parents
was "cleaner" than
working
through
coaches like
Tony Bland, a
discovery
dispute
erupted. The
defense team does
not want to
turn
over its members'
and former member's
notes with
witnesses they
seek to
call. Judge
Ramos noted
that the
former defense
lawyer was
still counsel
of record and
had not
been relieved.
Whereupon the
defense asked
for a
sidebar
conversation
out of the
hearing of
those like
Inner City
Press still in
the courtroom. But
the sidebar
discussion
was still
transcribed by the
official court
reporter.
When the
sidebar was
over nothing
was said about
its contents
except a
request by the
defense that
the transcript
be sealed.
Judge Edgardo
Ramos asked
if any of the
parties
objected - no
question
was asked to
the press, or
for the
public - and
the motion to
seal was
granted,
subject the
judge said to
any more "by
the parties."
We'll have
more on this.
Earlier on
April 29 Sood
interpreted
for the jury a
series of
video clips in
which
Christian
Dawkins said
that Lamont
Evans was not
worth the
$4,000 a month
bribe, unlike
Book
Richardson,
and that his
company LOYD
Inc should
focus more on
paying the
coaches for
particular
transactions
rather than
retainers.
Sood recounted
how he took
$25,000 in
cash and
deposited in
LOYD's account
in New Jersey
with Bank of
America.
The first week of
the trial ended on April 26
with Munish Sood being asked
about a $2,000 Berkshire Bank
check he wrote to Lamont
Evans, after he said Marty
Blazer harassed him to give
Evans money. He testified
about a meeting in Miami,
adding that he personally
liked Christian Dawkins, whom
he is testifying against. At
2:30 pm after he stepped down
and the jury left the defense
pointed out that Juror #3 has
been nodding off. Judge
Edgardo Ramo said, Let's see
what happens on Monday and if
necessary, a heart to heart.
The government for its part
argued that the juror with
eyes closed might still be
listening....
Earlier on April 26 the lawyer
for Christian Dawkins mocked
government witness Marty
Blazer for his lack of
knowledge about basketball
recruit rules and got Blazer
to answer questions about a
Creighton player named Marcus
Phillips who never, he then
revealed, played for
Creighton. There was an
immediate sidebar with Judge
Edgardo Ramos, then soon
thereafter a five minute
break. Or breakdown, fast
break. See @SDNYLIVE.
On April 25 a
lawyer for Merl Code started
to cross examine government
witness Marty Blazer. Blazer
insisted on called Merl
"Merrill," leading to him
being asked if he knew Merl
Code at all. Blazer began
paying Lamont Evans, for whom
the overall case is named, in
April or May 2016, and only
met Merl or Merrill Code in
June 2017. That's what things
ended for the day, with Code's
lawyer being told an objection
to his questions had only been
sustained as to form. It will
continue on April 26; watch
@SDNYLIVE's feed.
Earlier on April
25 the government played for
the jury video tapes of
Christian Dawkins with Marty
Blazer and Tony Bland of
University of Southern
California, along with an
undercover agent pixelated and
obscured. From the witness
stand Blazer said Dawkins told
Jeff that Bland "needs
$13,000," tying it to
"grassroots player" Marvin
Bagley. It got more specific:
if they could get Bagley, a
slew of low first round NBA
draft picks would follow, they
would have to hire underlings.
Next the government turned to
Preston Murphy of Creighton,
who Blazer said needed $6,000.
This after, on video, a white
envelope said to contain cash
changed hands. In the back of
the courtroom other Assistant
US Attorneys were watching --
while across the street in 40
Foley Square, one arrived late
for a 12:30 sentencing before
Judge Alison Nathan, now
postponed to April 26. We'll
have more on this.
On April 24
Blazer still on direct
examination interpreted audio
recordings for the jury, for
example that head coaches'
wives soon after the promotion
from assistant coach get
better clothes "and surgury."
On the role of assistant
coaches he gave the example of
Boston Celtics player P.J.
Dozier while at University of
South Carolina dealing much
more with assistant Lamont
Evans than with the head
coach. Objections were dealt
with crisply: "Objection -
foundation. "Overrule." "Thank
you, your Honor."
On April
23 the defense lawyer for
Christian Dawkins told the
jury that Dawkins told Book
Richardson "I'm Gucci" then
translated that as "I'm good"
and don't need money. The
lawyer for Merl Code said Code
told the FBI's undercover
yachtsman NOT to pay money to
his coaches, before traveling
to the Las Vegas meeting. The
government doggedly read
stipulations into the record
and called their first
witness, Chance Miller of
University of South Carolina
(and New York Law School
before that). We'll have more
on the trial - watch this site
and see the @SDNYLIVE
feed, here
***
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office, past & future?: S-303, UN, NY 10017 USA
For now UNder
Guterres: UN Delegates
Entrance Gate
and mail: Dag H.
Center
Box 20047, NY NY 10017 USA
SDNY
Press Room 480, 500
Pearl Street, NY NY
10007
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2018 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|