MCC Inmate Said Few Wear
Masks Amid Covid But SDNY Judge Keenan Says
Better Than Homeless Shelter
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon
BBC
- Guardian
UK - Honduras
- The
Source
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
April 27 – Robert Lee Miles,
detained amid Coronavirus in
the lower Manhattan
Metropolitan Correctional
Center, on April 22 argued to
be released, before U.S.
District Court for the
Southern District of New York
Judge John F. Keenan. Inner
City Press covered
it.
And this,
on April 27: Judge
Keenan in a
nuanced ruling
continued to
detain Miles,
with the
possibility he
can re-apply
if he has a
plan not
including the
homeless
shelter. See
below.
On April 22,
Miles' lawyer said his client
is with more than 40 inmates
on the 11th floor of the MCC,
that they are given masks but
that many "don't wear
them."
Assistant US
Attorney Daniel C. Richenthal
opposed release.
Judge Keenan
said, Rikers Island & the
MCC are 2 totally different
facilities... If I grant
release, how long would
quarantine be? 14 more days on
the 11th floor in the same
conditions? I'm going to ask
Mr. Richenthal
that.
Miles' lawyer
said, 14 days or less if BOP
says so.
AUSA
Richenthal began with a
"couple of small points... Mr
Miles is only 56. He's on the
high risk list because of
asthma as well as age."
He relayed that
the MCC warden told the EDNY
yesterday, 7 inmates have been
tested and 5 positive. So most
on the 11th floor have not
been tested.
Judge Keenan asked for the
letter, which AUSA Richenthal
pointed out is on the EDNY
website.
Richenthal said, Exhaustion is
mandatory. Our concern is Mr.
Miles' troubled history,
criminal history and history
of supervision. If you release
him, it should be to a halfway
house.
Judge Keenan assured, A
homeless shelter is more
likely to infect him than any
other place. I'm not going to
rule that way.
AUSA
Richenthal intoned, In light
of developments on Wards
Island [Here
is Inner City Press story the
day before about Wards Island,
here.]
Judge Keenan asked, The 46
inmates on the 11th floor of
the MCC, do they really share
the same shower and call that
quarantine?
AUSA Richenthal answered, Yes.
It is not
isolation.
Judge Keenan said, I'm going
to reserve decision.
Now on
April 27, Judge Keenan in a
nuanced ruling continued to
detain Miles, with the
possibility he can re-apply if
he has a plan not including
the homeless shelter: "ORDER
as to Robert Lee Miles. Before
the Court is an emergency
motion by Robert Lee Miles for
a sentence reduction to time
served and his immediate
release from the Metropolitan
Correctional Center, New York
("the MCC") due to Miles's
advanced age, compromised
health, and his status as a
medically "high-risk" inmate
who is especially vulnerable
to contracting the
Coronavirus, COVID-19
("COVID-19"). The Government
opposes Miles's motion as
untimely because he did not
first fully exhaust his
administrative rights under
the applicable statute, 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), before
seeking judicial
intervention.(See Footnote 1
on this Order). To its credit,
however, the Government
requests that, if the Court
were to grant Miles's motion,
the Court order (1) that Miles
either be quarantined for at
least 14 days or he be
otherwise determined by the
Federal Bureau of Prisons
("the BOP") to not have
COVID-19, so as to protect the
public; and (2) that the
conditions of Miles's
supervised release be modified
to add a special condition
that he reside in a
residential reentry
center--commonly known as a
halfway house--so as to
protect Miles, because
allowing him to return to a
homeless shelter, as Miles's
release plan initially
proposed, may increase his
risk of exposure to COVID-19,
given that many cases of the
virus are reported to exist in
such shelters. For the reasons
set forth below, Miles's
motion is DENIED....[See this
Order]... Nevertheless, after
considering the 3553(a)
factors, given the kinds of
sentences available, 18 U.S.C.
§ 3553(a)(3), and Miless
history and characteristics,
id. § 3553(a)(1), including
the significant behavioral
issues that arose during
Miles's recent stints in
inpatient substance abuse
programs and his prior and
seemingly willful refusal to
fully comply with the
conditions of his supervised
release, the Court is
decidedly concerned that
Miles's release plan will in
fact place him at a higher
risk of contracting COVID-19,
effectively undoing the very
reason for his compassionate
release. Accordingly, the
Court is not convinced that
Miles has set forth the
requisite "extraordinary and
compelling reasons" to justify
release pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(1)(A)(i), and his
motion must be denied. If,
however, Miles is able to
propose a release plan that is
acceptable to the U.S.
Probation Department for the
Southern District of New York,
the Court will readily revisit
this decision. Under those
circumstances, the Court would
urge the Government to
consider whether waiver of the
30-day exhaustion requirement
is warranted should its
opposition either (1) not
contest that extraordinary and
compelling reasons may exist
for immediate release; or (2)
request a quarantine period
that, when satisfied, would
permit the defendant's release
on a date more than 30-days
after the defendant's initial
request to the warden of the
defendant's facility.SO
ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John
F. Keenan on 4/25/2020)(bw)."
We'll have more on this. The
case is US v. Miles, 11-cr-581
(Keenan).
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2020 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|