| In Sex Trafficking Case
Paused By Covid Justin Rivera Was Found
Guilty, US Wants 25 Years
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon Thread
BBC
- Decrypt
- LightRead - Honduras
-
Source
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
Oct 4 – In the sex trafficking
trial of US v. Carl Andrews
that Inner City Press has been
reporting on despite a
partially sealed courtroom and
US Attorney withholding of
exhibits, the defense on March
14, 2020 asked for and got a
stay and then end of the
trial.
The reason?
Coronavirus COVID-19.
For that
re-trial one of the US
Attorney's Office's witnesses
is blamed for putting the
jury, court staff, and the
Press at risk (Inner City
Press witnessed and reported
on her March 12 testimony, here),
see below.
On April 21,
2021, U.S. District Court for
the Southern District of New
York Judge Paul A. Engelmayer
held a conference in the
run-up to the related US v.
Rivera trial, set for June.
On June 9, the US
Attorney's office was nearing
closing its case. On the
afternoon of June 9 victim
Natalie Rivera answered
question after question from
the Assistant US Attorney,
like:
Did you
want to keeping to prostitute
for him?
Answer: No.
What
did he mean by, you're my
bottom b-word?
Answer:
That's how pimps keep their
prostitutes.
Her
testimony came across as
forthright, as least to this
reporter. The jury filed out
at 4:55 pm, and Judge
Engelmayer arranged for
defense lawyer Anthony Cecutti
to meet with Rivera inside 40
Foley before he was taken back
to the MCC.
On June 11
until 1:12 pm, Justin Rivera's
defense lawyer gave his
closing to the 15 jurors and
alternates. He admitted, there
were guns, Justin beat
Natalie, they engaged in
prostitution business. But he
said Natalie had agency, that
she chose to prostitute
herself. He began, soon
another person will be in that
chair --
The
Assistant US Attorney
objected, and Judge Engelmayer
sustained the objection. With
the jury out to lunch, he
admonished the defense for
misstating the standard on
venue. It's not if the jury
doubts the memory of being in
Manhattan and the Bronx, it's
the preponderance of evidece.
At 5 pm on June
11, Inner City Press went back
to the courtroom, expecting to
see the jurors instructed on
not reading about the case
(here) over the weekend.
First, Judge Engelmayer
said that the jurors had
selected the foreperson, Juror
Number 1, and that he would be
sending them away for the
weekend. Then he said, There's
a been a verdict.
That was fast.
Six U.S.
Marshals came into the back
row where Inner City Press was
standing (the gallery had only
nine positions, largely taken
up with overflow counsel).
The jurors
were led in. On Count 1,
Conspiracy to commit sex
trafficking, how do you find?
The foreman said, Guilty. So
did the others when polled.
It being six
o'clock, Judge Engelmayer did
not yet set a sentencing date.
And the verdict won't be
docketed until Monday. But
it's here, just after, on
Inner City Press. And see this
live stream stand-up.
Now on December
30, the day after the
conviction of Ghislaine
Maxwell on five of six sex
trafficking charges, Rivera's
sentence was pushed back:
ORDER as to Justin Rivera: The
Court has received the
Government's letter of
December 22, 2021, Dkt. 930,
seeking an adjournment of
defendant Justin Rivera's
sentencing, presently
scheduled for January 20,
2022, and the defense's letter
of December 27, 2021, Dkt.
931, consenting to such
adjournment, albeit for
different reasons. The Court
grants the unopposed motion
and adjourns sentencing until
Monday, March 14, 2022, at
9:30 am. (Sentencing set for
3/14/2022 at 09:30 AM before
Judge Paul A. Engelmayer)
(Signed by Judge Paul A.
Engelmayer on 12/29/2021).
On October 4,
2022, with the sentencing
still not done but upcoming,
the US put in its 18 page
sentencing memorandum. While
Rivera is asking for something
"closer to 132 months," the US
Attorney's Office wants at
least 300 months. They discuss
not only trafficking but
witness tampering. Watch this
site.
Back on March 22,
Judge Engelmayer held another
proceeding, and Inner City
Press again covered it. One of
the issues involved Justin
Rivera being moved out of the
SHU in the MCC. His laptop
with discovery on it should be
transferred with him, Judge
Engelmayer said. He suggested
the Rivera's counsel email the
MCC, copying the US Attorney's
Office which should "me too
it," Judge Engelmayer said.
Watch this site.
On January 4, Judge Engelmayer held a
telephone conference about the new and
belated files, and Inner City Press covered
it. Because the US Attorney's Office
maintained that the trial should
still go forward
on February 16, Judge
Engelmayer said
3500 material
would be due - and, on
January 15, a letter reporting (Nejad-style)
on its
investigation as
to how the discovery lapse came
about." Watch
this site.
The case
is now US v. Rivera, 19-cr-131 (Engelmayer).
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2021 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|
,
