Noom Sued
For Unauthorized Auto-Renewals Loses Most
Motions To Dismiss in SDNY
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon
BBC
- Guardian
UK - Honduras
- ESPN
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
August 5 – In a case against
Noom for, among other things,
its luring of consumers into
automatic renewals without
their knowledge or consent,
Noom made a number of motions
to
dismiss.
On August 5, U.S. District
Court for the Southern
District of New York Judge
Lorna G. Schofield held a
proceeding. Inner City Press
covered it.
While
Judge Schofield grants a few
of Noom's requests, dismissing
causes of action asserting
conversion under New York,
Ohio, Texas, Alabama and DC
law, and a portion of the
California state law claims,
she left fully 274 causes of
actions standing.
The case is
Nichols, et al. v. Noom Inc.,
et al., 20-cv-3677 (Schofield)
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2021 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
|