Inner City Press





In Other Media-eg New Statesman, AJE, FP, Georgia, NYTAzerbaijan, CSM Click here to contact us     .



These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis
,



Share |   

Follow on TWITTER

Home -

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis

CONTRIBUTE

(FP Twitterati 100, 2013)

ICP on YouTube

More: InnerCityPro

BloggingHeads.tv
Sept 24, 2013

UN: Sri Lanka

VoA: NYCLU

FOIA Finds  

Google, Asked at UN About Censorship, Moved to Censor the Questioner, Sources Say, Blaming UN - Update - Editorial

Support this work by buying this book

Click on cover for secure site orders

also includes "Toxic Credit in the Global Inner City"
 

 

 


Community
Reinvestment

Bank Beat

Freedom of Information
 

How to Contact Us



Public Charge Case Back From Supreme Court Before SDNY Judge Daniels 2 Hours On Web Alert

By Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon
BBC - Guardian UK - Honduras - The Source

SDNY COURTHOUSE, May 18 – The public charge case, New York State et al. versus US Department of Homeland Security, was on for a hearing on May 18 before U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge George B. Daniels.

   The first plaintiffs' speaker said COVID-19 shifts the balance of equities, with hospital(s) in Central Park. 

   Judge Daniels said, I issued an injunction, the Supreme Court stayed my injunction. You asked the Supreme Court to clarify. Their order was two and a half lines. You're not asking me to stay the Supreme Court order, are you?

   The plaintiffs' lawyer replied, DHS posted an alert, solely on their website, about immigrants getting testing and treatment. [Inner City Press tweeted the order here.]

   Another plaintiffs' lawyer argued that the Supreme Court's order meant it thinks Second Circuit might uphold the District Court's stay.    

Judge Daniels asked, Was that even argued before the Supreme Court? They determined you may have not yet the requirements for a stay.     Plaintiffs' counsel: The theme of defendants' motion to dismiss is that our organizations which have diverted resources don't have a way to be heard by your Honor. That can't be right.

   After a bathroom break for the court reporter, and two and a half hours, the arguments ended without a decision, as in another immigration case in the afternoon. This case is State of New York et al. v. US Department of Homeland Security, 19-cv-7777 (Daniels). 

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA

Mail: Box 20047, Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540



Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2020 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com