With
SDNY Donziger Trial Still Set
for Sept 9 Now Oregon Lawyer
Says Too Risky To Fly
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Scoop
Patreon,
thread
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
Aug 21 – Steven Donziger, who
had a June 2020 trial date
postponed amid the Coronavirus
pandemic, was wrongly accused
of being close in Ecuador with
Rafael Correa and thus a
flight risk, it has emerged.
Donziger's lawyer Andrew J.
Frisch challenged Prosecutor
Rita Glavin and her firm
Seward & Kissel LLP for
alleged conflict of interest,
claims shot down on January 6.
But Frisch didn't raise, and
perhaps has no standing to
raise, another conflict of
interest, for prosecuting for
the US while also representing
defendants being prosecuted by
the US Attorney's Office.
On August
17, Judge Preska has
reaffirmed that the trial will
go forward on September 9. Now
on August 21, Dongizer's
Oregon-based co-counsel has
renewed the request to
postpone the trial, saying
that cross country airplane
travel is too dangerous. Dr
Anthony Fauci is cited. Watch
this site.
On July 9,
Donziger's lawyer Richard H.
Friedman asked SDNY Judge
Preska for disclosure of how
much is being paid for the
private prosecution of his
client. He cited US v. Suarez,
a Second Circuit decision find
a qualified public right of
access to CJA forms and says,
"that right should be even
stronger in the present
context."
Now on July
22, Judge Preska has ruled:
"ORDER as to Steven Donziger:
Having reviewed samples of
Seward & Kissel's prior
invoices for the special
prosecutors' work on this
case, the Court concludes that
disclosure in line with what
the Court of Appeals approved
in Suarez is appropriate. For
each paid invoice, the special
prosecutors shall disclose (i)
the invoice cover sheet
showing the billing totals;
(ii) the page of the billing
statement showing "Total
Hours," "Total Services,"
"Total Disbursements," and
"Total Amount Due," and
redacting any other
information from that page,
including any itemized time
entries or narrative
descriptions, as that
information risks improperly
revealing the prosecution's
strategy before trial and thus
falls outside the public right
of access; and (iii) the final
page of the invoice showing
the hours, rates, and amount
attributable to each
individual lawyer. To the
extent the special prosecutors
have concerns that producing
the invoices in the fashion
outlined above would threaten
disclosure of trial strategy
or would otherwise result in
prejudice, they may apply to
the Court for appropriate
relief. (Signed by Judge
Loretta A. Preska on
7/22/2020)." Watch this site.
Inner City Press politely in
writing asked for a response
on this last year; no answer.
It has been advised by other
criminal defense attorney's
that the issue should be
raised to the Federal
Defenders, given their role.
But should that be necessary?
We'll have more on this.
On
December 4 U.S.
District Court
for the
Southern
District of
New York Judge
Loretta A.
Preska
proposed four trial dates and
the parties chose, for now,
June 2020. Glavin, who has yet
to answer written Press
questions about simultaneous
services as Special Prosecutor
and CJA defense attorney (we
still remain hopeful, and open
to publishing any
explanation), again argued
that the Speedy Trial Act does
not apply to this proceeding.
Time was excluded
nevertheless.
On
September 13 in another off
shoot of l'affaire
Donzinger, SDNY Magistrate
Judge Robert W. Lehrburger a
discovery hearing was held.
The lawyer for Chevron
described in great detail the
so-called "Donzinger protocol"
to search for responsive
records. She then said there
were still bugs to the
protocol, such as a search for
Amazon as in the Ecuadorian
Amazon rainforest turning up
documents about what she
called the "mail order
company" Amazon. Somewhere
Jeff Bezos was wincing. Or
not.
Still
unexplained is how a lawyer
can at once prosecute a case
for the United States and
represent indigent criminal
defendants against it. We hope
to have more on this - we did
ask.
On August
12 Donzinger's then new lawyer
Andrew J. Frisch appeared
before SDNY Judge Loretta
Parker and informed her that
while follow lawyer Martin
Garbus, staying at Truro near
Provincetown in Massachusetts,
is willing to co-sign
Donziger's bond, it is
possible he will not travel to
the courthouse in Boston, much
less New York, in the time
frame specified.
Frisch
offered to find another
co-signer. Judge Preska gave
him until the close of
business on Wednesday, August
14. This
is a unique
hybrid of a
case, both
criminal and
civil; Judge
Preska for the
record
excluded time
under the
Speedy Trial
Act.
Representing
the United States in the
proceeding was lawyer Rita J.
Glavin, who also serves as an
appointed criminal defense
attorney on the SDNY's
Criminal Justice Act panel,
which to some
might seem a
conflict, into
which Inner
City Press has
respectfully
inquired. And
is still
waiting. The
case is US v.
Donziger,
19-cr-561
(Preska).
Inner City Press
will continue to cover this
and other SDNY and 2nd Circuit
cases - watch this site, and there is
more on
Patreon, here.
***
Feedback: Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
Box
20047, Dag Hammarskjold Station NY
NY 10017
Other, earlier Inner
City Press are listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2020 Inner
City Press, Inc. To request reprint or
other permission, e-contact Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com for
|