Rapper
Casanova Offered $2.5 Million For Release
But SDNY Opposes Here
By Matthew
Russell Lee,Exclusive Patreon
BBC
- Guardian
UK - Honduras
- ESPN
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
Jan 6 – On the day Tekashi
#6ix9ine co-defendant Kooda B
was sentenced to 54 months in
prison for arranging a
shooting at Chief Keef, fellow
rapper Caswell Senior or
Casanova along with 17 others
was charged with
racketeering. Inner City
Press will also cover this
case - now on January 2
Casanova's bail memo offering
$2.5 million below.
After Casanova's surrender and
detention, his retained lawyer
has not on January 2 put
together and submitted a
package of co-signers: "we
propose that Mr. Senior be
released on a bond in the
amount of $2,500,000.00
secured by the five properties
and thirteen co-signors." More
on Patreon, including the
complete filing, here.
Now on January 6,
the US has opposed, filing on
Patreon here:
"Re: United States v. Caswell
Senior, a/k/a “Casanova,”
20-cr-626 (PMH) Dear Judge
Halpern: The Government
respectfully submits this
letter in opposition to
defendant Caswell Senior’s
motion for pretrial release.
For the reasons set forth
below, the Government agrees
with the recommendation of
Pretrial Services that
detention pending trial is
warranted in this case. I.
Applicable Law The
Government’s initial detention
memorandum, attached and
incorporated as Exhibit A,
sets forth the governing
standards. As set forth in
that memorandum, this is a
case where there is a
statutory presumption of
detention because the
defendant is charged with both
a controlled substance offense
punishable by at least 10
years imprisonment and offense
under Section 924(c). 18
U.S.C. § 3142(e)(3)(A), (B).
Thus, the defendant “bears a
limited burden of
production—not a burden of
persuasion—to rebut that
presumption by coming forward
with evidence that he does not
pose a danger to the community
or a risk of flight.” United
States v. Mercedes, 254 F.3d
433, 436 (2d Cir. 2001). II.
The Defendant Cannot Rebut the
Presumption of Dangerousness
The defendant offers little to
assure the safety of the
community apart from blanket
and wholly unrealistic denials
of the very serious charges
returned by the Grand Jury.
This is, of course, wholly
insufficient and fails to
satisfy even the “limited
burden” placed on him to rebut
the presumption that he poses
a danger to the community. And
so the presumption of
detention based on
dangerousness remains amply
supported in this case. The
Charges Here Are Supported By
Robust Evidence The crux of
the defendant’s arguments on
this front is that there is
little to no evidence that he
committed the charged crimes.
Cf. United States v.
Contreras, 776 F.2d 51, 53–54
(2d Cir. Case
7:20-cr-00626-PMH Document 79
Filed 01/06/21 Page 1 of 13
January 6, 2021 Page 2 of 13
1985) (holding an Indictment
returned by a Grand Jury
“conclusively determines the
existence of probable cause”).
The defendant states that the
Government’s case boils down
to his “rap lyrics.” Def’s
Submission at 10. That is
simply not true. While it
isincredibly disturbing that
the defendant used his
now-deleted Instagram profile
and public platform to
shamelessly promote a violent
street gang, his participation
in the Untouchable Gorilla
Stone Nation (“Gorilla Stone”)
enterprise ran much deeper
than that. Right up until his
arrest, the defendant was in
the thick of Gorilla’s Stone’s
dangerous and illicit
activity. With respect to
dangerousness, and as detailed
below, the defendant has
access to numerous firearms,
and appears to be regularly
armed. For example, in the
hours before his codefendants
were arrested on December 1,
2020, the defendant posted the
picture of the below assault
rifle with the caption
'Gripped Up.'"
Readers may
remember that the Barclays
Center shooting that #6ix9ine
and his co-defendants were
charged with involved or
targeted Casanova. Inner City
Press tweeted video here.
The US Attorney's
Office announced that the gang
"committed terrible acts of
violence, trafficked in
narcotics, and even engaged in
brazen fraud by exploiting
benefits programs meant to
provide assistance in response
to the COVID-19
pandemic. Because of
that, communities across the
Southern District – from
Poughkeepsie to Peekskill to
New York City –
suffered."
Casanova is
barely mentioned in the
announcement, and is charged
in the Complaint in Count 1,
Racketeering, Count 13
(narcotics) and Count 14
(firearms).
But on
December 3, this went into the
document, from the US
Attorney: "Caswell Senior,
a/k/a “Casanova” Senior is a
rapper of some notoriety.
Using his public platform, he
has amplified the message of
the gang—both through his
music and his social media
profiles. For example, he
appeared on a gang anthem this
summer, “Big Ape,” which has
garnered over 1.8 million
views on YouTube since June. 3
In
addition, he has used his
Instagram page to pay homage
to the gang, posting the below
photos demonstrating his
allegiance to Gorilla
Stone: 2
Walker faces a mandatory
minimum sentence of 25 years’
imprisonment on Count Fourteen
due to his previous federal
conviction in 2003 of
violating 18 U.S.C. § 924(c).
3 Defendants Luster,
Thomas, and Brinae Thornton,
a/k/a “Luxury,” all appear in
the video and—alongside
defendant Reid—are mentioned
in the song’s lyrics.
Senior has
closely coordinated his
artistic endeavors to benefit
the gang. For example, over
recorded prison calls, the
Government has learned that
defendant Reid shares in some
of Senior’s earnings. Senior
has also relied on Gorilla
Stone members for protection.
In wire intercepts, defendant
Luster is recorded admitting
that Senior has called upon
him to provide protection and
firearms (“hammers”) while
Senior was traveling across
the country. Senior’s pending
robbery charge—the underlying
conduct for which was captured
on high-quality surveillance
video—in New York County
Supreme Court provides a
concrete example of how he has
relied on the gang for acts of
violence.
In clear
surveillance video, taken from
a diner in Manhattan in August
2018, Senior is seen lunging
across a table for a victim’s
cellphone. A scuffle ensues
and eventually a fellow
Gorilla Stone member, Bobby
Williams, places the victim in
a chokehold until the victim
lost consciousness and is
dropped to the floor.4
Senior has also personally
committed acts of violence. In
addition to his current open
robbery charge, Senior has
twice been convicted of
Robbery in the First Degree.
In public
interviews, he has admitted to
stabbing inmates while
incarcerated on those charges.
And the Government has
recovered photos from his
iCloud account of several
firearms, demonstrating his
continued access to weapons.
In addition to publicly
promoting the gang and
glorifying its activies,
Senior is also a drug supplier
for Gorilla Stone.
Through
direct Instagram messages and
iMessages, obtained through
search warrants, the
Government has learned that
Senior uses gang members,
including both Naya Austin and
Brandon Soto, a/k/a “Stacks,”
to sell drugs throughout New
York. Austin, as described
above, and Soto, as described
directly below, are two of the
gang’s most violent members
and prolific drug dealers.
Senior faces a mandatory
minimum sentence of 15 years
in prison and—because of his
prior violent felony
convictions—is a Career
Offender under the Guidelines.
Senior is charged
in the following counts:
Count One (Racketeering
Conspiracy);
Count Thirteen
(Narcotics Conspiracy); and
Count Fourteen (Possession of
Firearms in Furtherance of
Narcotics Conspiracy and
Aiding and Abetting the Same)
Senior’s prior violent
felonies, the fact that
Senior’s gang activity has
continued while on pretrial
release for his open robbery
case, his continued access to
firearms, and his willingness
to rely on the gang to provide
protection—in some cases
violently—are all factors that
weigh heavily in favor of
detention.
FN 4 Bobby
Williams was charged as a
co-defendant with Senior in
the robbery case in New York
County Supreme Court. Williams
pled guilty to Strangulation
in the Second Degree in New
York County Supreme Court and
was sentenced to five years’
imprisonment. Senior is
currently on pre-trial release
in that case."
There is a
video circulating; some ask
Inner City Press if it's
normal and we responded with a
Honduras narco-traffic Q&A
we published, here.
We'll have more on this.
Given that
Kooda B / Kintea McKinzie's
music videos, with red
bandanas, were used against
him, Inner City Press wonders
what may be cited in this
case.
The case is US v.
Reid, et al., 20-cr-626
(Halpern).
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2020 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
|