Inner City Press





In Other Media-eg New Statesman, AJE, FP, Georgia, NYTAzerbaijan, CSM Click here to contact us     .



These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis
,



Share |   

Follow on TWITTER

Home -

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis

CONTRIBUTE

(FP Twitterati 100, 2013)

ICP on YouTube

More: InnerCityPro

BloggingHeads.tv
Sept 24, 2013

UN: Sri Lanka

VoA: NYCLU

FOIA Finds  

Google, Asked at UN About Censorship, Moved to Censor the Questioner, Sources Say, Blaming UN - Update - Editorial

Support this work by buying this book

Click on cover for secure site orders

also includes "Toxic Credit in the Global Inner City"
 

 

 


Community
Reinvestment

Bank Beat

Freedom of Information
 

How to Contact Us



In Inside Trading Case Ex-Rep Buyer on Merger of T-Mobile Wants Oral Argument Nov 17

By Matthew Russell Lee, Light Reading, Patreon

SDNY COURTHOUSE, Sept 26 – The two week trial against the proposed T-Mobile / Sprint merger ended on December 20, 2019 before U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Victor Marrero. There were papers due January 8, and a final four hour argument on January 15. Inner City Press began what will be a trial-long live-tweet, here. Day 7 Patreon here.

On July 25, 2022 the SDNY prosecutors unsealed an indictment of ex Rep Stephen Buyer for illegal trading on the merger. They scheduled an 11:30 am press conference which Inner City Press went to attend with smart phone to live stream.

On July 27, Buyer accompanied by his wife was in Courtroom 17B of 500 Pearl Street to be arraigned. Inner City Press live tweeted it here.

On August 31, Judge Richard M. Berman held a US v. Buyer proceeding, ranging from the so-called filter team to trial dates, most likely in February 2023. Inner City Press live tweeted here:

Assistant US Attorney: We are producing discovery, including early Jencks Act material. Still outstanding are the laptop computer that was seized from the defendant under a search warrant. We've produced the entire contents, but not the responsive set

 AUSA: There's an issue with the format in which the laptop was initially imaged. And, the files will need to be subjected to a filter review. We've conferred with the defense about conducting the filter. There are outstanding subpoena returns

AUSA: We've had preliminary discussions about when to hold a trial. Defense hasn't yet told us when they'd be prepared to file motions. Judge Richard Berman: Let's hear from the defense. Buyer's lawyer: On the laptop, we want to talk to the filter team leader

AUSA: The role of the filter team is to go into data sets & segregate out the materials that are search term hits for potentially privileged communications. Talking about the screen is done with the prosecutors, not the filter team, it would be inefficient for her

AUSA: We understand that Mr. Alonso wants to speak to her. He has proposed to us some search terms and we've passed them along or will do so shortly. But we don't understand why we should put defense counsel into direct contact with the filter team.

 Judge Berman: I'll give you the last oral world, Mr. Alonso. Alonso: We talk to DOJ filter teams all the time. I'm in touch with one in DC right now. We have serious questions in this case whether the filter team has the same view. We'd like to reduce wear n' tear

 Judge Berman: You can send me a 2 page letter, Mr. Alonso. I'll give you my determination by memo endorsement. By when? Alonso: Friday. Judge Berman: Noon? Alonso: End of business, if possible. Judge Berman: 5 pm. US response Tuesday at noon.

Alonso: I have another issue. The US gave us 3 sets of warrants. I don't know if the first set involve the filter team? AUSA:  My understanding is that a filter team was involved. But the Internet service provider warrant were when the investigation was covert.

2d Defense counsel: We'd like a trial just after Thanksgiving. Judge Berman: That's not going to work for the Court. We have a big trial. We're looking at February. That's going to be the best I can do, I think.

 2d Defense counsel: If your other case breaks down, we could give you January dates. In February, I cannot do it before the 20th. Once we have the trial date we can work backwards on a schedule. Judge Berman: Always helpful to have the dates.

 Next is Wednesday, Dec 7 at 11 am. Defense: We prefer in-person. Judge Berman: I'll try.  AUSA: If you can make an oral finding under the CARES Act?

Judge Berman: I'm making that finding now. I got an email this morning for a ceremonial proceeding in the courthouse with respect to one of our learned colleagues. There's a discussion of testing and masks and social distancing. So it's still an issue.. 

 AUSA: Any date after Feb 20 is fine with us. Nov was a problem for us, but it is for the court as well. Our case would be two weeks or more. Defense: Three weeks total, assuming the US doesn't take up much of the 3d week. AUSA: Let's exclude Speedy Trial Act time

 Judge Berman: I'm going to grant that application.  I think that's it. Adjourned.

On September 26, Buyer's counsel informed Judge Berman they'll file their pre-trial motions on October 17 and that they want oral argument on November 17. The February 21, 2023 trial remains on the calendar. Watch this site.

This case is US v. Buyer, 22-cr-397 (Berman)

Watch @InnerCityPress.

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

sdny

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com

Box 20047, Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540



Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2022 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com for