For Avenatti In Nike Case A November
12 Trial Date While More Delay in Stormy
Daniels Case
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon,
Alamy, video
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
June 18 – When Michael
Avenatti phoned in to a status
conference in the Nike
extortion case against him on
June 18, he said nothing other
than confirming he was on the
line and has no scheduling
conflict for the trial now
scheduled for November 12.
His laywer
Scott A. Srebnick told
U.S. District
Court for the
Southern
District of
New York Judge
Paul
G. Gardephe
that the trial
might have to
be delayed
because
Avenatti's law
firm's server
has still not
been reviewed.
He said it is
in the
possession of
the U.S.
Attorney's
Office for the
Central
District of
California.
SDNY Assistant
US Attorney
Podolsky said
that he has
not seen the
server,
either. Don't
these US
Attorney's
Office, both
part of the US
Justice
Department,
work together?
Or do they
mostly
compete?
Across Pearl
Street at the
courtroom of
SDNY Judge
Batts, which
Avenatti was
to have
appeared at
10:30 am, a
signed on the
door said that
the conference
has been
adjourned
until July 23.
(Srebnick says
it is "to
allow for new
counsel in
that case to
enter his
appearance and
begin
reviewing the
discovery.")
Instead Judge
Batts was
taking a
surreal and
halting guilty
plea, with
Inner City
Press the only
media in that
large
courtroom, of
Defendant
Augustin
Zamora-Vega
who could not
remember where
in the SDNY he
had
transported
drugs.
Avenatti if
nothing else
knows his way
around the
system. So
beyond the
motion
schedule --
August 19 for
Srebnick,
September 19
for Podolsky
and Richenthal
with an
October 3
reply --
whether this
trial actually
starts the day
after
Veteran's Day
is anybody's
guess. See
@InnerCityPress
and the news
@SDNYLIVE.
Back at his in
person arraignment on the Nike
extortion charges against him
on May 28, Judge Gardephe asked
him about each
of the
charges, How
do you plead?
"One hundred
percent not
guilty,"
Avenatti
answered four
times,
something he
expanded
slightly on in
a
question-less
press gaggle
in Foley
Square just
after the
proceeding.
Periscope
video here.
Alamy photos here.
Judge
Gardephe began
by disclosing
that Assistant
U.S. Attorney
Robert B.
Sobelman had
been an intern
of his while
in law school.
Judge Gardephe
said this
would have no
effect. He
asked AUSA Matthew
Podolsky
when the
discovery
material would
begin to be
produced.
As soon as
Avenatti's
lawyer Scott
Srebnick signs
a protective
order and
provides a thumb drive, was
the answer. It
seems it will
be a disk. Judge
Gardephe set
the next
conference for
June 18 at noon,
an hour an a half
after Avenatti
and some
lawyer are set
to appear
before SDNY
Judge Deborah
Batts in the
Stormy Daniels
case.
Earlier
on May 28
before Judge
Batts, Avenatti's
first move was
to have his
Miami-based lawyer
Srebnick ask
to transfer
the Daniels
case to California.
The U.S. Attorney for
the SDNY's office
opposed the request, saying
it met none of
the Supreme
Court's factors
for change in
venue in the
1964 case Platt
v. Minnesota
Mining &
Mfg. Co.,
376 U.S.
240. Attorney
Srebnick's
motion to make
a motion was
denied.
[Assistant
U.S. Attorney
Matthew Podolsky
told Judge Batts
he had
recently
beaten back a
similar
attempt to
delay by
bifurcated
venue motions.
For more,
see Patreon, here.]
Judge
Batts set June
18 for the
next
conference, by
which time she
said
Avenatti
should have
retained
counsel in the
case.
Earlier before
SDNY Magistrate
Judge James L.
Cott, Avenatti
was released
on $300,000
bond. The U.S.
Marshals who
bought him in
from the cell
block entrance
- he
surrendered at
6:54 am in the
morning - were
not needed to
take him on
remand to the
MCC.
Avenatti still
had a Federal
Defenders
lawyer, though
only for
purposes of
presentment.
The rest,
Judge Cott
said, will
have to be
dealt with
later. Two
other
proceedings
awaited
Avenatti on
May 28 in the
SDNY: a 2 pm
conference in
the Stormy
Daniels case
before Judge ,
and a 3:30 pm
proceeding in
the indictment
about alleged
extortion of
Nike before
For the Stormy
Danial ID
theft case,
Avenatti
agreed to the
requirement he
notify Pre
Trial Services
before any
domestic
travel beyond
the Southern
and Eastern
Districts in
New York and
the Central
District of
California.
In this agreed
package, U.S.
Attorney for
the SDNY
Geoffrey L.
Berman imposed
more
restrictions
on Avenatti
than last week
on briber
banker Stephen
M. Calk.
Back on May 23
Calk of FDIC-regulated Federal
Savings Bank was presented and
arraigned for financial
institution bribery for
corruptly using his position
with FSB to issue $16 million
in high-risk loans to Paul
Manafort in a bid to obtain a
senior position with the Trump
administration, namely
Undersecretary of the Army.
On May 23
Magistrate Judge Debra
Freeman accepted the
government's proposal of $5
million bond with no co-signer
(although that is usually
required for moral suasion)
and travel allowed throughout
the United States (though more
defendants are usually
confined to the Soutern and
Eastern District of NY and one
other district). Money talks.
Afterward
in front of the SDNY
courthouse Inner City Press
asked Calk's lawyers Daniel
Stein and Jeremy Margoles
about Manafort saying he had
misstated his financial
situation to get the FSB
loans. When did Calk know?
They did not answer. Video here,
Facebook video here.
Inner City Press' Alamy photos
here.
On May 23,
still from the SDNY courthouse
covering other cases including
one involving the death
penalty, Inner City
Press reported
finding no U.S. Home Mortgage
Disclosure Act data for
"Federal Savings Bank." But
there's more.
The Federal
Savings Bank's website,
while providing a generic link
to the FDIC, and a statement
"Member FDIC," has no link for
the U.S. Community
Reinvestment Act. (Nor does it
mention the indictment of
Stephen Calk, simply listing
his brother John Calk now as
CEO and Vice Chairman. Who is
the chairman?)
It lists a
loan production office on
Avenue J in Brooklyn, and two
deposit taking braches in
Illinois. Did it see some
exemption from the CRA and
other consumer protection
laws? From fair lending laws?
Earlier on
the morning of May 24 Inner
City Press asked the FDIC,
"Having covered yesterday's
arraignment of the Chairman of
The Federal Savings Bank in
the SDNY courthouse, including
the FDIC's involvement, I
checked the bank's website and
found "Member FDIC" but no
mention of the Community
Reinvestment Act."
The FDIC's
spokesperson David Barr, to
his credit, responded quickly,
writing to Inner City Press:
"The Federal Savings Bank,
Chicago, is regulated by the
Office of the Comptroller of
the Currency. They would be
responsible for CRA and
regulatory oversight. You
should contact the OCC for
more information."
Now the
OCC under Comptroller Joseph
Otting has done everything
possible to block the release
of information, denying FOIA
fees waivers and expedited
treatment, refusing comments.
But for now online the OCC has
said this about The Federal
Savings Bank: "While TFSB
originated a substantial
majority of its loans outside
of its AAs; the bank’s
business strategy is to
operate as a mortgage banking
entity with a nationwide
presence and market place.
Taking the bank’s business
strategy into consideration
the bank’s performance under
this lending criterion is
deemed reasonable."
Reasonable? Bribery, too,
seems to have been part of its
business strategy, right under
the nose of the OCC of Otting.
Before 2
pm on May 24 Inner City Press
in writing asked Otting's OCC:
"This is a Press question for
the OCC, from Inner City
Press... Please confirm that
The Federal Savings Bank is
subject to HMDA, and/or if it
is below a threshold, as I can
find no data in its name on
FFIEC.gov. Also, please today
provide as an OCC response to
the Press this OCC-regulated
bank's CRA public file and
other information in the OCC's
possession concerning the
bank's CRA and fair lending
performance. Is it
normal for a bank not to
mention these things on its
website, nor to provide any
link to its actual regulator,
the OCC, but only to the
FDIC?
Please explain what steps the
OCC is taking beyond Stephen
Calk no longer being the CEO.
What about his brother?"
More than
three hours later, even to the
questions at the end, the OCC
had only provided this:
"We are reviewing your
questions, but we may not be
able to respond by your
deadline.
Regards,
Stephanie
Stephanie Collins
Manager, Media Relations
Public Affairs
Operations Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency."
This is the same OCC which has
delayed FOR MONTHS providing
basic information about a
merger it has now already
rubber stamped.
On the
morning of May 28 Inner City
Press received from the OCC a
statement that The Federal
Savings Banks is subject to
HMDA - how they are listed in
the HMDA database remains a
question - and this:
"Question: Is it normal
for a bank not to mention
these things [CRA and HMDA] on
its website, nor to provide
any link to its actual
regulator, the OCC, but only
to the FDIC? [OCC
answer:] This question is best
directed to the bank."
So wait:
Otting's OCC leaves it
entirely up to the banks it
ostensibly regulates whether
to mention on their website
and presumably branches CRA,
HMDA or even the OCC where
consumers could complain?
We'll have more on this.
Stephen
Calk was quoted,
at least in 2012, opposing
regulation: "As Mr. Stephen
Calk writes in the September
7, 2012 edition of Origination
News: “Basel III is designed
to level the playing field
among major banking
institutions that operate
internationally. Force-feeding
these same rules to community
banks in the United States is
unnecessary and in fact
counter-productive,
particularly in the current
economic environment.” Basel
III is one thing. But no
Community Reinvestment Act?
The Federal
Savings Bank lists locations -
and bankers - in
Arizona - Scottsdale
California - Irvine Colorado -
Fort Collins Delaware -
Selbyville Florida - Sarasota
Illinois - Chicago Illinois -
Lake Forest Illinois - Oak
Brook Illinois - Park Ridge
Indiana - Bloomington Indiana
- Indianapolis Kansas -
Overland Park Louisiana -
Laplace Maryland - Annapolis
Maryland - Timonium CD
Massachusetts - Lawrence New
Jersey - Hackensack New Jersey
- Lakewood New York - Brooklyn
New York - Melville New York -
New York New York - Queens
North Carolina - Raleigh Ohio
- Columbus Rhode Island -
South Kingstown Tennessee -
Nashville Virginia -
Alexandria Virginia -
Fredericksburg Virginia -
Newport News Virginia -
Richmond Virginia - Vienna
Virginia - Warrenton...
We'll have more on this.
In the
indictment press release, FDIC
OIG Special Agent-in-Charge
Patricia Tarasca said,
“Today’s indictment charges
Stephen Calk with misusing his
position as Chairman and CEO
of a bank for his own personal
gain. The FDIC Office of
Inspector General remains
committed to investigating
cases where bank officials
cause multimillion-dollar
losses to a financial
institution and undermine its
integrity.” (The FDIC stands
to be the lead regulator of
BB&T whose money
laundering enforcement action
was just terminated by the
Federal Reserve to facilitate
merger with Suntrust, click here
for that and Inner City Press'
FOIA request and appeal.)
Earlier still in
the May in the SDNY,
Congressman Christopher
Collins (R-NY) waived his
right to be present for a May
3 hearing in the criminal
insider trading case against
him held past 5 pm in the SDNY
courtroom of
Judge Broderick.
On May 10, Judge
Broderick
started on
l'affaire
Collins at 2
pm, after a
case against
BuzzFeed
(Inner City
Press coverage
here).
Early in
the
proceeding,
before two
shackled inmates
were led in leading
to a brief
suspension of
the white
shoe SEC
Congressman
matter, Broderick
made a joke
about Donald
Trump and
evasive legal
moves. I'm not
going there, said
one of the
participants in
Collins, who was an
early endorser
of Trump.
Broderick
said, "I
shouldn't have
either
- but it is
what it is."
This case
is USA
v. Collins, et
al.,
18-cr-00567
(VSB). More on
Patreon,
here.
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
Box 20047, Dag Hammarskjold
Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2019 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|