N95 Mask Price Gouger Schirripa
Pleads Only To False Statements to DEA on
Medicine
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon Podcast
BBC
- Guardian
UK - Honduras
- The
Source
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
March 2 – The Coronavirus
pandemic has provided an
opportunity for a variety of
fraudsters, from price gougers
to some defrauding the
Paycheck Protection Program
through lenders, to sometimes
the lenders themselves, an
issue Inner City Press has
been inquiring into and
reporting on.
Back on May 26
the U.S. Attorney for the
Southern District of New York
announced the arrest of
Richard Schirripa, a/k/a “the
Mask Man,” a licensed
pharmacist, on charges of
violating the Defense
Production Act by hoarding and
price gouging scarce N95
masks; making two false
statements to law enforcement;
committing healthcare fraud;
and committing aggravated
identity theft.
Inner City
Press live tweeted Schirripa's
presentment, at which he was
released on $250,000 with the
SDNY's consent, here.
Now, with
little notice, Schirripa
appeared on March 2 before
SDNY Judge George B. Daniels
to plead guilty, only to false
statements to the DEA about
keeping controlled substances
when he closed his pharmacy.
The sentencing
recommendation in the plea
agreement wasn't disclosed in
the proceeding; count one
(hoarding and price gouging
under the DPA) can be raised
at sentencing, but has not
been pled to. Inner City Press
live tweeted it, here, and
will cover the sentencing:
Judge finds him
competent. "Do you wish to
plead guilty?" A: Yes.
Judge: Are you
satisfied with your attorney?
A: Yes. This was supposed to
be at 12:30 but there were
technical problems. Schirripa
said, "If I'm on the only one
one, Gerry, can I be the
judge?" His lawyer advised him
not to say any more.
From the
[initial] complaint: Schirripa
hoarded 1000s of 3M N95 masks.
Then he charged up to $25 for
a mask which should have cost
$1.27. Inner City Press
waiting to hear if he's gotten
a plea deal for a particular
sentencing recommendation.
Judge is reading from plea
agreement, for this COVID mask
price gouging. Schirripa is
pleading to only one count,
for a sentencing
recommendation of... Judge
refers to the letter but
doesn't read from it. Defense
lawyer: We think it is an
appropriate disposition.
Schirripa
is only pleading guilty to
keeping controlled substances
when he closed his pharmacy -
or really, only to making
false statements to the DEA
about it. Judge: How do you
plead? Schirripa: Guilty. What
about the mask hoarding and
price gouging?
AUSA: I'll
put into the record three
stipulations. Either party is
permitted to make arguments at
sentencing about the conduct
charged in Count 1. That is,
Defense Production Act -
Hoarding and Price Gouging.
He's not pleading to that, in
the plea deal.
Defense
lawyer: There's a lot
underlying that factually. We
have an agreement. I don't
think it's necessary to go any
further than that.
Sentencing
will be July 13 - the defense
counsel said without irony
that hopefully COVID will be
gone by then.
The case is still
listed as US v. Schirripa,
20-mj-5275 (Daniels).
Update: After
publication of the above, and
this
podcast, the plea
agreement became available
including that "Based upon the
calculations set forth above,
the defendant’s stipulated
Guidelines range is 0 to 6
months’ imprisonment (the
“Stipulated Guidelines
Range”). In addition, after
determining the defendant’s
ability to pay, the Court may
impose a fine pursuant to
U.S.S.G. § 5E1.2. At
Guidelines level four, the
applicable fine range is $500
to $9,500." Plea agreement on
Patreon here.
Earlier then-U.S.
Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman
said: “As alleged,
Richard Schirripa exploited an
unprecedented crisis to engage
in profiteering. He
allegedly spent over $200,000
accumulating N95 masks and
then sold masks at inflated
prices, charging customers up
to 50% more than he had paid
to acquire those N95
masks. As alleged,
during a sale to an undercover
officer, Schirripa said, ‘I
feel like a drug
dealer.’ He also
allegedly committed several
additional, unrelated crimes,
including lying to law
enforcement, defrauding
Medicare and Medicaid, and
exploiting the personal
information of his pharmacy’s
customers to fill
prescriptions.”
Inner City
Press will stay on this. The
case is US v. Schirripa,
20-mj-5275 (Wang).
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2019 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|