In Delayed 2001 Attacks Case
Saudi Arabia Wants Audio Feed Cut and
Courtroom Closed
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon
BBC
- Decrypt
- LightRead - Honduras
-
Source
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
Oct 30 –
In ongoing lawsuit "In Re
Terrorist Attacks on September
11, 2001," originally filed in
2003, the COVID 19 pandemic of
2020 continues to cause a
pause, one being used by the
Saudi defendants, it emerged
at a telephone conference with
some 300 attendees on May 21,
2020. Inner City Press covered
it, below.
Jump cut
forward to September 29, 2021
when
U.S.
District Court
for the
Southern
District of
New York
Magistrate
Judge Sarah
Netburn held a
telephone
conference
with Dubai
Islamic Bank
and others,
about experts.
Inner City
Press live
tweeted it, here.
On Thursday
October 28,
before a
Monday hearing,
John Fawcett's
right to now
invoke the Fifth
Amendment to
avoid
questions
about his leak
of information
from the case
was taken
up, and
disposed of,
by Judge
Netburn.
Inner City
Press live
tweeted here.
The rejection
of Fawcett's
Fifth
Amendment
claims by Magistrate
Judge Netburn
was upheld by
District Judge
George B.
Daniels
on October 29.
On Saturday
October 30,
two days
before the
hearing, Saudi
Arabia
proposed
cutting off
the audio line
and closing
the courtroom
for some or
all of Fawcett's
testimony.
Letter
here.
It is an
outrage:
"counsel for
Saudi Arabia
proposed that
the
courtroom be
closed for any
testimony that
reveals
protected
material, and
counsel for
Fawcett
proposed that,
in order to
avoid
inadvertent
disclosure of
protected
material, the
courtroom
be
closed and the
audio feed be
cut off for
the entirety
of Fawcett’s
testimony,
that
counsel
promptly
review the
transcript and
propose
redactions,
and that the
transcript be
made public
as soon
as practicable
after the
hearing. Saudi
Arabia takes
no position on
whether the
courtroom
should be
closed for the
entirety of
Fawcett’s
testimony. If
the courtroom
is not closed
for the
entirety of
Fawcett’s
testimony, we
request that
counsel and
the witness be
instructed not
to
disclose Saudi
Arabia’s or Al
Jarrah’s
protected
information
without giving
us an
opportunity
to
object and to
request that
the courtroom
be closed for
that specific
part of the
testimony."
Watch this
site.
On
October
29, District
Judge George B. Daniels heard
argument then
upheld Magistrate
Judge Netburn
and rejected
the invocation
of the Fifth
Amendment.
Inner City
Press live
tweeted here:
OK - in
the 9/11
case
@SDNYLIVE ,
now 2d
proceeding in
2 day about
5th Amendment
claim by
Kreindler
&
Kreindler's
John Fawcett
for allegedly
having leaked
a copy of a
deposition
from the case
against Saudi
Arabia.
Yesterday
Magistrate
Judge Netburn
shot down
Fawcett's use
of Fifth
Amendment at
Monday's
hearing, here.
But
they've gotten
a quick
re-hearing
before
District Judge
George B.
Daniels. He
asks about the
Klein test.
Fawcett's
lawyer: Now
that the Court
is considering
a criminal
referral,
there are new
grounds for
apprehension.
Judge
Daniels: If
there were no
new grounds,
would he have
any basis to
not testify?
Fawcett's
lawyer: Yes,
the first -
Judge: I read
the
transcript.
Judge
Daniels:
Didn't he
already
understand
that if he
violated the
court order
and admitted
to it, he
might face
criminal
contempt?
Fawcett's
lawyer: He's a
non-lawyer.
Judge Daniels:
I'm supposed
to assume that
when he
submitted the
2d affidavit
he didn't
know?
Judge
Daniels: It's
like a Perry
Mason moment -
he breaks down
and confesses,
then says,
Perry Mason
can't ask me
any more
question while
I'm on the
stand.
Judge
Daniels says
again and
again Fawcett
can't invoke
the Fifth.
Annoying
beeping on the
line.
Judge
Daniels: I
believe
Magistrate
Judge Netburn
was right in
denying the
invocation of
the Fifth
Amendment by
Mr. Fawcett
Inner City Press
notes that in this case,
Docket Item 6122, Motion for
Conference dated April 14,
2020, says "You do not have
permission to view this
document." The case is In Re
Terrorist Attacks on September
11, 2001, 03-md-1570 (Daniels
/ Netburn).
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2020 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|