After
Challenge to Drug Cases
Disparity SDNY Judge Rakoff
Sentences Brito to 48 Months
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Exclusive,
Patreon
Honduras
- The
Source - The
Root - etc
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
Feb 22 – Racism in federal law
enforcement in the Southern
District of New York was
alleged and argued on October
31, 2019 with five defendants
in shackles and Inner City
Press the only media in the
SDNY courtroom of Judge Jed S.
Rakoff. Only Inner City Press
reported it at that time, here.
And now on
November 19, 2020, while Judge
Rakoff waited for his MiMedx
securities fraud jury to come
back with its mixed verdict,
he sentenced the last of the
defendants in the case, Kevin
Brito.
Brito while
on charges in the EDNY
committed the crimes. His
lawyer urged Judge Rakoff to
fit his sentence concurrent
into the 40 months imposed in
the EDNY. Ultimately Judge
Rakoff, noting he'd assigned
30 months to Wandy Dominguez
who cooperated or almost
cooperated, sentenced Brito to
48 months - but concurrent
with the EDNY 40. So, eight
extra months. And a mixed
verdict in MiMedx.
On
December 14, 2019 another
media reported on the case, here,
amid the daily drum beat of
other prosecutions and guilty
pleas untouched by this one
case.
And now,
typically, the collapse of the
systemic challenge and the
drum-beat of guilty pleas is
hardly covered, with only
Inner City Press at two guilty
pleas in the case in the past
week, here
(Amaurys Hernandez) and here
(the halting plea of Angel
Crispin).
Here's how
the challenged died, in a
February 3 Order: " JED S.
RAKOFF, U.S.D.J. 19-cr-32 3 (
JSR) ORDER In an unsolicited
letter dated January 24, 2020,
the defendants in the
above-captioned case, rather
than submitting a motion
addressed to selective
enforcement as required by
that date, instead sought
further discovery. Essentially
for the reasons stated in the
Government's responsive
letter, dated January 31, 2020
(to be docketed along with
this order), the defendants'
requests are denied. If
defendants still wish to file
a motion based on their claim
of selective enforcement, they
must now do so by February 10,
2020, a deadline that will not
be extended for any reason.
The Government's answer to any
such motion will be due
February 17, and any reply
papers from the defendants
must be filed by February 20.
The Court will decide any such
motion prior to the March 2
trial date, which remains
firmly in place." Now the
guilty pleas.
A serious
issue was raised with little
coverage other than Inner City
Press, taken up by others,
then collapsed without a word
from the proponents, back to
business as usual, long
sentences. We'll have more on
this.
We'll have more on this.
In the
issue and statistics in that
multi-defendant case is an
asserted disparity by race in
the targeting by law
enforcement in the SDNY of
reverse sting operations.
On
November 5 in yet another
sting operation Robert Adriano
Pena pled guilty to conspiracy
to commit Hobbs Act robbery
before SDNY Judge Edgardo
Ramos. In the briefing plea
allocution there was mention
of the case or issues before
Judge Rakoff. It seems Pena
did not get a plea deal,
because pleading only to count
1, conspiracy. The case is US
v. Pena, 18-cr-844-1 (Ramos).
Pena's
alleged co-conspirator Jose
Martinez-Rentas already pled
guilty. He then replead in
light of the Supreme Court's
decision in US v. Davis. But
again, no mention of the case
before Judge Rakoff.
Is the
assertion and litigation of
the disparity a windfall,
potentially, for some
defendants but not others?
Inner City Press will continue
to cover these cases - and
these issues.
Back on October 31, Judge
Rakoff asked lead attorney
Christopher Flood whether the
racial disparities he and his
colleague are alleging are, in
fact, statistically
significant.
Passed to Judge Rakoff via his
deputy was the declaration of
Profession Crystal S. Yang
asserting "the racial
composition of targeted
individuals in DEA
reverse-sting stash house
cases brought in the SDNY" for
the past ten years: "46
operations targeted 179
individuals of whom zero are
White, two are Asian and 177
are Latino or Black." This is
followed by regression
analysis.
Assistant US Attorney Domenic
Gentile, alone at the
prosecutor's table, doggedly
returned to these particular
defendants wearing face masks,
and having been recruited
through the lead defendant,
Flood's client.
Judge Rakoff said it was
interesting, but how was it
relevant? He committed to
issuing an order on Flood et
al's discovery motion by
November 12, if only in
bottom-line form, in advance
of a March 2020 trial. The
other defense
attorneys on
the discovery
motion include
Jennifer Luo,
Michael
Tremonte, John
Diaz,
Stephanie
Carvlin,
Xavier
Donaldson,
Dawn Cardi,
and the
omnipresent
Calvin
Scholar.
The case is USA
v. Lopez et al.,
19-cr-323 (Rakoff). Inner City
Press will continue to report
on this case, and on these
issues.
***
Feedback: Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
Box
20047, Dag Hammarskjold Station NY
NY 10017
Other, earlier Inner
City Press are listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2020 Inner
City Press, Inc. To request reprint or
other permission, e-contact Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com for
|