In SDNY Crack Trial
Defendant Murphy Called A 32 Caliber A Shaq
Jersey Then Decatur Crib Blitzed
By Matthew
Russell Lee, @SDNYLIVE
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
August 14 -- Just before the
narcotics conspiracy trial US
v. Ernest Murphy
began jury selection on
Monday, August 12 in the U.S.
District Court for the
Southern District of New York,
Circuit Judge Richard J.
Sullivan harshly admonished
the SDNY US Attorney's Office
for "abject violation of a
court order."
Then
he proceeded to pick a jury, a
process that extended past 5
pm. In these report Inner City
Press will omit jurors' names
said in open court, and for
now that of a cooperating
witness whose identify as of
this writing is still sealed
in the docket, as are
proceedings in US
v. Rodriguez.
On August
14 the morning began with
Judge Sullivan declining to
exclude expert testimony about
how crack is packaged for
sale. Then cooperating witness
Mister Curtis was brought
back, just before the delayed
jury, with no leg shackles but
with two then one U.S.
Marshal. He ran through
wiretapped phone calls, for
most of which a transcript was
shown on the video monitor.
Ernest
Murphy was and probably still
is poetic. He said "after I
Twin Tower 'em;" a .32 was
described as Shaq's Jersey.
But then came the photos of
the stash house on Decatur
where his worker Tyquan
Robinson was arrested and then
suspected of being a snitch.
(This was the Decatur crib -
or brib - "blitz.") His
sentencing before Judge
Sullivan has been delayed -
compare to the hyper Tekashi
6ix9ine / Nine Trey gang case
which Inner City Press also
covered on August 14, here.
On August
13 the afternoon was devoted
to Assistant US Attorney
Matthew Hellman questioning
cooperating witness Mr.
Curtis, mostly by playing him
audio wiretaps of phone calls.
Some, presumably supporters of
the defendants, had come and
read along with the
transcripts of the calls shown
on the video screen installed
in Courtroom 15A. There was
talk of drugs and a gun
stashed in a house with four
video cameras.
Inner City
Press has requested from the
US Attorney's Office access to
the exhibits, a response to
Judge Sullivan's criticism of
their belated disclosure in
this case and about another
case last year before SDNY
Judge Alison Nathan. At day's
end on August 13, Judge
Sullivan questioned how much
expert testimony about slang
should come in.
On August
14 government witnesses will
including NYPD Detective Billy
Warren, to whom Detective
James Miles repeatedly
referred, his exhibits
admitted only "subject to
connection." Watch this site.
Before the
opening statements on August
13 Judge Sullivan told the
jurors that if anyone they
know comes into the courtroom
to let him know and he might
ask the person to leave the
courtroom. Then Assistant US
Attorney Karin Portlock, in a
short opening statement, said
after a raid on one of
Murphy's stash houses he was
arrested entering a Bronx
courthouse with 15 bags of
crack in his cap.
Defense
attorney Joyce in an even
shorter opening told the jury
to pay particular attention to
the DNA evidence in the case.
First
witness Detective James Miles
described an "abandonment
sample" of a cigarette he said
was Murphy's. But when asked
why he stopped taking
photographs of evidence in
Murphy's bedroom in 401 Legion
Street, Miles said he didn't
want to touch the "white rocky
substance" because he has
kids. Joyce objected.
At one
point Judge Sullivan, a former
prosecutor, started doing his
own questioning of Miles.
We'll have more on this.
Without
giving names, one prospective
juror earlier in the process
identified Ralph Avenue as a
"low income area," and
indicated that he would would
not be unbiased regarding the
drug charges at issue in this
case. Another vocal
prospective juror, citing his
girlfriend's father having a
legal role near San Fransisco,
was also let go. But a late
arriving juror replacing a
sick one, a ran of the Seattle
Seahawks, was kept on as an
alternate.
Judge
Sullivan took the opportunity
to wax poetic on the diversity
of New York juries. Due to one
chosen member it seems even
the morning session on Friday,
August 16 will not take place.
But Judge Sullivan while
admonishing all and sundry not
to trust or check the Internet
predicts the trial will end
mid-next week. Watch this
site.
As a remedy for
the abject violation of a
court order, rather than the
adjournment requested in
writing by both sides over the
weekend, Judge Sullivan on
August 12 precluded use at the
trial of hours of videos and
jailhouse telephone calls. It
makes the conviction of Murphy
less likely; his lawyers
switched their request for
adjournment to preclusion. How
will the US Attorney's Office
answer for this? Inner City
Press has asked that Office,
for access to all exhibits and
explanation of sealed
proceedings.
On Sunday
night before the trial
scheduled for Monday morning,
Murphy's lawyers Patrick Joyce
and Robert Moore wrote to
Judge Sullivan "to alert the
Court that tomorrow morning we
also intend to discuss [that]
the late evening of August 10,
2019, the Government provided
additional 3500 material to
defense counsel via USAfx
consisting of 70 phone calls
made by the Cooperating
Witness while in custody in
this case."
Some
evidence is being excluded; on
other of the calls, defense
counsel will be allowed to
recall to the stand for cross
examination government witness
after having next weekend to
review the 3500 material. The
case is US v. Ernest
Murphy, 18-cr-373
(Sullivan).
Also, the
US Attorney's Office referred
to "lab reports (primarily for
reanalysis)—all but one of
which we received on Friday
and Saturday. We received lab
report #5 corresponding to
voucher 3000912001 (crack
seized from Decatur) on August
1 and apologize for not
sending that one along
sooner."
Before
Judge Sullivan on August 12,
apology was not enough. He
called it an "abject violation
of a court order." But how
will it impact the trial?
Inner City Press has been
covering this and other
proceedings before Judge
Sullivan, except one which the
parties are trying to seal, here.
Watch this site.
The government
has argued that during the
trial, whenever it now begins,
the defense should not be
allowed to question NYPD
witnesses about, among other
things, shooting and killing
an armed motorist, and the
City settling a ranged of
cases against them for amounts
like $40,000 and $15,000 and
at least two substantiated
cases before the Civilian
Complaint Review Board.
On August 9 Judge
Sullivan was set to sentence
Murphy's co-defendant Tyquan
Robinson. But the sentencing
was postponed, for the second
day in a row.
Judge
Sullivan submitted Assistant
US Attorney Matthew Hellman to
intense questioning about why
Robinson had been allowed to
plead guilty to only the gun
count, for a 10 year mandatory
minimum sentence, and not
Count 1, narcotics. He said
that others don't get that
deal - why Robinson?
Already in
the gallery, where Inner City
Press was again the only
media, Robinson's four family
members showed concern, later
in one case tears.
Hellman
replied that while Robinson
maintained the stash house at
672 Decatur Street in Brooklyn
it was really a "hovel"
ultimately controlled by
Murphy, who's set to go on
trial Monday. Judge Sullivan
repeated this word, hovel -
then pointed to Robinson's rap
lyrics which Hollman's own
sentencing submission had
quoted:
"In later music
videos, Robinson lionized the
shooting as an event which
cemented the Boss Crew’s
status on the block, and
declared, “Talk facts/We don’t
fuck with [Victim-1]/That
nigga a rat/Broad day so many
shots nigga couldn’t throw
nothing back.” Id. From this
incident and others, Robinson
also warned that those who
cooperate with law enforcement
must be dealt with severely to
avoid consequences to one’s
crew: “The other niggas
stupid/if you shoot a rat off
him/If you don’t you gon’ be
the only one taking losses.”
Additionally, Robinson
discussed shootouts on the
block controlled by the Boss
Crew, stating “So many
shootouts man I swear I lost
count/but they respect our
shit now so I guess it all
count.” Id."
Id indeed.
Judge Sullivan asked
Robinson's defense lawyers
James Roth and Benjamin
Silverman pointedly if
Robinson had since "changed
his tune." Roth said if Judge
Sullivan was, as had become
clear, considering an upward
departure above ten years, he
must provide notice.
And so a
briefing schedule was
established: Roth's briefing
after vacation due on
September 9, the government -
without rap, we assume - on
September 23, and Roth's reply
on September 30. No new
sentencing date has been set.
Inner City Press will continue
covering these cases - and in
inquiring about transparency.
Watch this site.
As noted
this was the second morning in
a row a sentencing in this
conspiracy got postponed.
Judge Sullivan on August 8 was
set to sentence Murphy's
co-defendant Lloyd Gordon.
Gordon's
family has come to the
courthouse, initially to 40
Foley Square then to the
sign-less Courtroom 15A in 500
Pearl Street Judge Sullivan
has been using. But Gordon's
lawyer James Kousouros had
argued that the government
breached its plea agreement by
doubling the amount of drugs
it alleges, between the plea
deal and its reporting to
Probation.
First
Judge Sullivan asked what the
remedy would be, if Kousouros
was claiming that he as as the
judge was bound by the offense
level Assistant US Attorney
Karin Portlock had initially
agreed to.
While
Kousouros, not yet seeing
where this was going, answered
about unfairness, Judge
Sullivan went on to suggest
that an evidentiary proceeding
known as a Fatico hearing
might be necessary.
Soon
Gordon was whispering to
Kousouros who then said his
client wanted to go forward
with sentencing today. But it
was too late. Judge Sullivan
said by challenging the
government's doubling of drug
weight Kousouros had let a
genie out of the bottle and
raised "appellate issues."
Judge
Sullivan apologized to the
family members in the gallery,
who by the end were nodding in
agreement, that yes a possible
difference in sentence between
seven years and ten years was
important enough not to go off
half cocked. So Kousouros'
brief, after this two and a a
half week vacation, is due on
September 6, the government's
on September 20. And what of
Murphy by then, in his partial
sealed trial?
Judge
Sullivan earlier on August 8
noted that it is an open
courtroom, a strength of our
system, anyone can just walk
in -- except for US v. Rodriguez,
apparently, on which Inner
City Press will have more, as
well as on the differences
between the SDNY's and EDNY's
boiler plate plea agreement
letters. Watch this site.
Inner
City Press
will have more
on this - see
also @InnerCityPress
and the new @SDNYLIVE.
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
Box 20047, Dag Hammarskjold
Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2019 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|