Inner City Press





In Other Media-eg New Statesman, AJE, FP, Georgia, NYTAzerbaijan, CSM Click here to contact us     .



These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis
,



Share |   

Follow on TWITTER

Home -

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis

CONTRIBUTE

(FP Twitterati 100, 2013)

ICP on YouTube

More: InnerCityPro

BloggingHeads.tv
Sept 24, 2013

UN: Sri Lanka

VoA: NYCLU

FOIA Finds  

Google, Asked at UN About Censorship, Moved to Censor the Questioner, Sources Say, Blaming UN - Update - Editorial

Support this work by buying this book

Click on cover for secure site orders

also includes "Toxic Credit in the Global Inner City"
 

 

 


Community
Reinvestment

Bank Beat

Freedom of Information
 

How to Contact Us



Synthetic Diamond Patent Case Features 2 Man Affidavit and Judge Rakoff Zingers in SDNY

By Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon
BBC - Guardian UK - Honduras - ESPN

SDNY COURTHOUSE, Nov 24 – A patent dispute about synthetic diamonds, complete with a rare two-person affidavit and Hague Convention requests to India, resulted in a virtual / Zoom oral argument on November 24 before U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Jed S. Rakoff.

Inner City Press covered it - as much as it could.   

Counsel repeatedly asked Judge Rakoff, Can I share my screen? It has confidential information which I'll avoid describing on the record.

   So listening by phone, it was difficult to assess the strength of some of the arguments. But there were zingers from Judge Rakoff, as when he demanded to know how it was that two person signed an affidavit - would they also take the witness stand together?  

It may not come to that - as to the case, it seems all there is left to argue about is the attorneys fees.

At the end, saying he had another proceeding at 4:30, Judge Rakoff told the lawyers that the night before he had told his wife that he would be hearing argument in an interesting patent case.

After he responded to her request for a summary of the case, she asked, You call that interesting?  

It got a big laugh, a near perfect walk-out line, even on the Zoom. Decision was as they say reserved.

The case is, or was, Carnegie Institution of Washington et al v. Pure Grown Diamonds, Inc. et al., 20-cv-189 (Rakoff)

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA

Mail: Box 20047, Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540



Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2020 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com