In DEA
Corruption Case of Costanzo & Recio US
Seeks Attorney Disqualification So July 22
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon Maxwell
Book
BBC-Guardian
UK - Honduras
- ESPN
NY
Mag
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
July 15 – On May 20 DOJ
announced that "JOHN COSTANZO
JR., a Drug Enforcement
Administration Special Agent,
and MANUEL RECIO, a former DEA
Assistant Special
Agent-in-Charge, were indicted
in Manhattan federal court
with conspiracy to bribe a
public official, conspiracy to
commit honest services wire
fraud, and honest services
wire fraud, for a scheme in
which RECIO funneled tens of
thousands of dollars to
COSTANZO in exchange for
COSTANZO providing sensitive
law enforcement information to
RECIO to assist RECIO in
recruiting clients for defense
lawyers."
Costanzo appeared
the in the 2022 U.S. District
Court for the Southern
District of New York
Magistrates Court that day and
was released on $30,000 bond.
His case was assigned to
District Judge J. Paul Oekten,
who held a conference in the
case on June 6. Inner City
Press attended and live
tweeted, below.
On July 15, Judge
Oekten held another
conference, which Inner City
Press live tweeted here:
Assistant US
Attorney: We anticipate
calling Recio's lawyer Philip
L Reizenstein as a witness. So
we'd be happy to do an oral
argument. But bringing people
up from Florida?
AUSA: This was a $20,000
payment via a shell company,
we believe the invoice about
the Johnny Grobman case was a
sham.
Recio's lawyer
Philip Reizenstein: I'm not
going to call it a shell
company. And I wasn't with the
firm that hired Mr. Recio as
an investigator
Judge Oetken: You
were one of three lawyers on
the case, right?
Reizenstein: That
is absolutely correct... Recio
was hired to looking into a
corruption matter in Suriname.
Outcome: joint
status report due in a week,
with a possible stipulation
being discussed. Inner City
Press will stay on the case -
and this upcoming filings.
Afterward:
"Minute Entry for proceedings
held before Judge J. Paul
Oetken: Status Conference as
to John Costanzo, Jr, Manuel
Recio held on 7/15/2022.
Defendant John Costanzo
present with attorneys Marc
Mukasey, Stephanie Guaba and
Torrey Young; Defendant Manuel
Recio present with attorney
Phillip Reizenstein; AUSA
Sebastian Swett present; Court
Reporter present. Telephonic
status conference held: Status
letter due by 7/22/2022."
From June 6:
Recio, it seems, needs a
Curcio hearing of potential
conflict of interest.
Judge Oetken: Any
search warrant? AUSA: Yes. And
a wire tap. AUSA: For Mr
Costanzo there's an audio
recording. [When will the
Press and public get a
copy?]
Judge: Any
superseder of additional
defendants?
AUSA: It's
on the table.
Mukasey: So are
motions against the searches,
under the 4th Amendment.
Mukasey: We'll be
asking for the earliest trial
date possible. But not yet.
Judge: Motions then a
conference Nov 4 at 11 am,
Speedy Trial Act excluded
until then. AUSA:
Recio's lawyer may have a
conflict - he's a potential
witness.
Recio's lawyer
worked for him in Miami,
referred by a firm which paid
Recio. But he says he didn't
sit at counsel table.
AUSA: If there's a plea, the
conflict would be moot.
US letter
alleging conflict on Patreon here.
Later, this
summary: "Minute Entry for
proceedings held before Judge
J. Paul Oetken: Pretrial
Conference as to John
Costanzo, Jr., Manuel Recio
held on 6/6/2022. Defendant
John Costanzo present with
attorneys Marc Mukasey and
Torrey Young; Defendant Manuel
Recio present with attorney
Phillip Reizenstein; AUSA
Sebastian Swett present; Court
Reporter present. Initial
conference held: Motions due
by 9/9/2022 with responses by
10/7/2022 and replies by
10/21/2022. Next conference
set for 11/4/2022 at 11:00am.
Time is excluded to 11/4/2022.
Bail continued."
On June 27 the US
Attorney's Office formally
sought the disqualification of
Philip Reisenstein, affirming
they spoke with him on June 22
and told him he would likely
be a witness at trial,
necessitating his withdrawal.
"Rezenstein informed the
Government that he would not
be withdrawing his
representation and the
Government could move to
disqualify him." Watch this
site.
The case is US v.
Costanzo, 22-cr-281
(Oetken)
***
Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a
month helps keep us going and grants you
access to exclusive bonus material on our
Patreon page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2022 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
|