| On
Gun Defendant Freed on Bond Inner City
Press Asked USA Williams Now 12 Defendants
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon Maxwell
Book
BBC
- Guardian
UK - Honduras
- ESPN
SDNY MAG COURT
EXCLUSIVE, Aug 4 - In
the U.S. District Court for
the Southern District of New
York on July 27, a detention
or release proceeding was held
by Magistrate Judge Sarah
Netburn on a defendant charged
with firearms use, carrying
and possession in a narcotics
conspiracy that was not, in
the proceeding, named.
It was Own
Every Dollar, the subject of
an SDNY / Manhattan DA press
conference on August 2
announcing the unsealing of a
superseding indictment for
multiple murders including in
The Bronx. Why is the Bronx DA
not involved?
At the August 2
press conference, the Bronx DA
was name-checked. But when the
NYPD Police Commissioner
offered credit, it was to
three Manhattan units, nothing
in The Bronx. She was asked
about officers hit with
botters in the 44th Precinct.
Inner City Press asked
US Attorney Williams about
Jose Gutierrez being ordered
released last week - an appeal
stopped it - and when the
superseding indictment for
murder was known of. He cited
a detention memo that we will
seek out, and upcoming
Magistrates Court proceeding.
Thread here.
Inner City
Press went to the bond appeal
hearing of Gutierrez on August
3, before Judge J. Paul Oetken
who has the overall case now.
While those in the superseding
indictment were described as
the leadership of OED, Judge
Oetken took an individualized
approach and upheld the order
freeing Gutierrez, whose
mother Flor and sister were
again present.
But after Judge
Oetken left the bench, the
question of when Gutierrez
will be freed arose. Both
co-signers were not available;
Gutierrez was ordered to be
produced on August 4, when all
co-defendants would be before
Judge Oetken in Courtroom 318.
Inner City Press
went on August 4, into the
jam-packed courtroom. Twelve
defendants in the jury box,
each with a defense counsel.
Family members and supporters
in the gallery.
An issue arose
about the proposed protective
order. One counsel opposed the
language about threats to
witnesses; the AUSA replied
that one of the defendants has
a conviction for witness
tampering. That defendant's
able counsel asked about the
need and scope of attorneys
eyes only, that it can drive a
wedge between the defendant
and his lawyer.
At the end Judge
Oekten released "The next
pretrial conference is
scheduled for 12/9/2022 at
11:30am. Time is excluded to
12/9/2022. Bail continued as
to defendants Colon and Marte,
detention continued as to the
other defendants." And Jose
Gutierrez...
[USA Williams was
asked about the offer to free
or trade armed deal Viktor
Bout, and referred the
question to the White House.
Now with the sentence passed
in Russia, the deal or not
draws closer. Watch this
site.]
During the
July 27 proceeding,
with Inner City Press the only
media present, the defendant's
retained attorney referred to
a bail application he had
filed with the assigned
District Judge J. Paul Oekten.
Magistrate Judge Netburn
hadn't gotten or seen it and
so took a break in the back to
do so.
Inner City
Press has found the letter on
PACER, complete with the
defendant's sister Josemary's
financial information from her
employer, J.P. Morgan Chase.
Judge
Netburn returned, and noted
the presence of the
defendant's mother Flor in the
gallery. She said she would
release the defendant with his
mother as a third party
custodian, charged with
notifying the authorities if
her son so much as
communicates with
co-conspirators. She nodded.
The
Assistant US Attorney asked
for a stay, to consider an
appeal to Judge Oetken. Judge
Netburn said stay through
Friday.
When was
the superseding indictment
known about?
The stay then was
extended
at least through August 3:
"ORDER as to Jose Gutierrez...
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: The
defendant's release on bail is
stayed pending the outcome of
the August 3 bail hearing by
this Court. SO ORDERED. (Bond
Hearing set for 8/3/2022 at
03:00 PM before Judge J. Paul
Oetken.) (Signed by Judge J.
Paul Oetken on 7/27/22).
The overall case
is US v. Nunez, et al.,
22-cr-293 (Oetken / Netburn)
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2022 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
|
,
