In Captive
Insurance Lawsuit Third Party Defendants
Want More Time to Answer
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon Maxwell
Book
BBC
- Guardian
UK - Honduras
- ESPN
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
Feb 22 –
Medmarc Casualty Insurance
Company sued Clark &
Gentry, PLLC seeking a
declaration is it not
obligated to indemnify the
firm and affiliates in
connection with underlying
lawsuits arising from the
firm's legal services related
to their Captive Services
practice.
For example, a
suit by Benyamin and Orna
Avrahami, business owners in
Arizona.
On February 22, U.S. District
Court for the Southern
District of New York Judge
John P. Cronan held a
proceeding. Inner City Press
covered it.
Now third
party defendants Robert Homer
and BNC Insurance Agency want
an extension of time to answer
the third-party complain.
The case is
Medmarc Casualty Insurance
Company v. Clark & Gentry,
PLLC et al., 21-cv-7224
(Cronan)
***
Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a
month helps keep us going and grants you
access to exclusive bonus material on our
Patreon page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2022 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
|