Mega Bank Said 2004 NYBD
Letter Prevented Showing Docs Now Quietly
Settles Case
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon
BBC
- Guardian
UK - Honduras
- The
Source
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
Nov 13 – Mega International
Commercial Bank passed
information about its P&G
Auditors to Navigant, and an
allegedly absolute privilege
for bank regulatory documents
is being cited and now
"documented," if only with a
partially redacted 2004
interpretative letter of the
then-NYSBD. Inner City Press
is on the case, which still
has the potential to simply
disappear into settlement
world. (On November 13, 2020,
the parties indicated they are
settling, see below).
Earlier in the case, U.S.
District Court for the
Southern District of New York
Judge J. Paul Oetken asked to
see the documents at issue.
But Mega
Bank's lawyer from Gottesman,
Wolge, Secunda said that would
not be possible, without
angering the NYS Department of
Financial Services.
Judge
Oetken said, one week to
convince me otherwise with
case law, or turn over the
documents in three weeks. Or
settle. A number was floated
by the parties but Inner City
Press due to recent unclarity
is still not publishing it.
And still
not now, on November 13, even
as counsel to Mega has written
to Judge Oetken, that the
parties "have reached a
settlement in principle."
Watch this site.
Back on May 22
Mega's lawyer filed a 2004
letter: "2004 NY Bank. LEXIS
14 State of New York Banking
Department August 31, 2004
Reporter 2004 NY Bank. LEXIS
14 * Subject: Re: Outsourcing
of Bank Human Resources and
Payroll Functions Core Terms
outsource, service provider,
payroll, administrative duty,
national bank, general
supervision, bank's board,
third party, confidential,
supervisory, underwrite,
interview, lease, opine
Request By: [*1] [REDACTED BY
THE AGENCY] Reply Staff
Letters and Memoranda
Supervisory Procedure G 101
Dear Mr. []: Your letter of
November 21, 2003 to
Superintendent of Banks Taylor
has been referred to me for
reply. Let me begin by
apologizing for the delay in
responding to your letter. In
part, this delay resulted from
our need to review this matter
with several of our
supervisory divisions in the
Department. ... we conclude
that it is permissible under
the Banking Law for a
State-chartered bank [*3] to
enter into an agreement
whereby the bank would
outsource the administrative
duties of its Human Resources
and Payroll departments to an
independent service provider.
The bank and the independent
service provider entering into
such an outsourcing agreement
will be subject to certain
conditions. First, the bank
must provide the Banking
Department with prior written
notice of its intention to
enter such an outsourcing
agreement. Second, the bank's
board of directors must
continue to retain and
exercise general supervision
over the affairs of the bank.
Third, the independent service
provider must agree that the
Superintendent has the right
to examine all of its records
and material, use the
equipment and interview its
employees. And fourth, the
independent service provider
must agree that it is bound by
the limitations of Banking Law
Section 36(10), with respect
to confidential supervisory
and examination material, and
provide the Department with a
description of how it will
ensure the confidentiality of
such material. I trust the
foregoing is responsive to
your inquiry. Should you have
any further questions please
feel free to contact me at
(212) 709-1649. Sincerely
yours, Written By: Jay [*4]
Kane Assistant Counsel."
Then in
August, this: "ORDER
terminating [43] Letter Motion
for Discovery; granting [47]
Letter Motion to Stay ;
granting [49] Letter Motion
for Extension of Time to
Complete Discovery. Without
prejudice to the authority of
the Court to order parties to
produce documents for in
camera inspection, and in the
interest of conserving
judicial resources and
deferring to agency expertise,
Defendant's motion to stay the
part of the May 15, 2020,
Order regarding the production
of materials withheld as
confidential supervisory
information is granted.
Plaintiff may seek review of
these materials through the
appropriate administrative
procedures, and Defendant is
instructed to cooperate fully
with Plaintiff and the
appropriate agencies to
facilitate Plaintiffs exercise
of its administrative
remedies. Plaintiff's motion
to extend the time to complete
discovery to February 5, 2021,
is also granted. Plaintiff
shall file a status letter
regarding the agencies' review
on or before September 15,
2020. The Clerk of Court is
directed to close the motions
at Docket Numbers 43, 47, and
49. SO ORDERED. (Discovery due
by 2/5/2021.) (Signed by Judge
J. Paul Oetken on 8/20/2020)."
On October
26, this Order: "In its
September 15, 2020 status
letter, Plaintiff contended
that Defendant had yet to
“provide[] any documents” to
the pertinent agencies tasked
with identifying confidential
supervisory information
(“CSI”). (Dkt. No. 52 at 2.)
Defendant’s separate status
letter, dated September 30,
2020, did not rebut
Plaintiff’s contention. (See
generally Dkt. No. 54.)
Recalling its August 20, 2020
Order directing Defendant “to
cooperate fully with Plaintiff
and the appropriate agencies,”
and mindful of the fact that
discovery is set to close on
February 5, 2021, (Dkt. No.
51), the Court directs
Defendant to produce all
responsive documents that
Defendants believe contain CSI
to the pertinent agencies no
later than November 6, 2020.
The parties shall file a joint
status letter regarding the
agencies’ review on or before
November 20, 2020. SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 26, 2020 New
York, New York, J. PAUL
OETKEN United States
District Judge"
The case is
P&G Auditors and
Consultants, LLC v. Mega
International Commercial Bank
Co., Ltd, 18-cv-9232 (Oetken).
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2020 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
|