After SDNY Defendant
King Couldn't Answer
Questions Now Superseder
& Unsealing Order
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Exclusive,
Patreon
Honduras
- The
Source - The
Root - etc
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
April 29 –
A man was pleading guilty to
felony gun possession and use
on November 15, 2019 before
U.S. District Court for the
Southern District of New York
Judge Andrew L. Carter.
But
as Inner City Press reported,
the defendant Bob King could
not answer the questions,
about whether he had discussed
his possible sentence with his
lawyer coming to plead guilty,
if he understood about the
probation report,
nothing.
First Judge
Carter took a break. But when
he came back in, things were
not better. He gave King and
his lawyer until 3 pm to
confer in the interview cells
in 40 Foley Square.
At 3 pm
Inner City Press after
publishing the above and
broadcasting a Periscope from
outside the courthouse went
back to Judge Carter's (and
Judge Engelmeyer's) 13th
floor. There, King was was by
the elevators in shackled,
just leaving. Judge Carter's
door was locked. Apparently
the guilty plea was again,
appropriately, not taken.
A full
week later, the "note" of the
first postponement was
belatedly placed in the docket
on November 22: "Minute Entry
for proceedings held before
Judge Andrew L. Carter,
Jr:Sentencing held on
11/15/2019 for Bob King (1)
Count 1. Defendant Bob King
appears with attorney Tommy
Vu. AUSA Andrew Rohrbach for
the Government. Case will be
second called today. Defendant
remain in custody. "
On
December 14 Judge Carter again
heard the case. King does not
remember the events. His
lawyer offered an Alford plea,
or no lo contendere. The AUSA
said DOJ would oppose that
plea, and asked for time to
brief it. The US Attorney's
Office also opposed a bench
trial.
So Judge
Carter set a jury trial, for
May 24.
On February 4,
King's lawyer wrote in and
asked for a March or April
bench trial. But Judge Carter
wrote, "DENIED."
On April
20, 2021, after King's lawyer
issued notice that he intends
to introduce expert evidence
related to mental condition at
trial, the US Attorney's
Office has complained and
asked for an extension of the
trial.
On April
21, King's lawyer filed notes
from the "call with Dr
Jenkins, April 13," including
Wirshba, Rohrbach and Mandel
(paralegal), including that Dr
Jenkins "has not reviewed the
file in a while but she
diagnosed him with
malingering... re defense that
King's memory issues would
have prevented him from
recalling that he was a
felony" [sic]. The US
Attorney's Office replied
again asking for delay of the
May 3 trial.
Now, the US has
gotten a superseding
indicment, and on April 30
wrote to Judge Carter that the
Office "does not consent to a
bench trial" and has
"submitted to the Court a
protective order and a request
for unsealing of Bronx County
grand jury materials."
Inner City
Press will continue on this
case. It is US v. King,
18-cr-308 (Carter).
***
Feedback: Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007
Mail:
Box 20047, Dag Hammarskjold
Station NY NY 10017
Other, earlier Inner
City Press are listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2019 Inner
City Press, Inc. To request reprint or
other permission, e-contact Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com for
|