| Carpenters Union Bribee
Tagliaferro Get 60 Months Starting Jan 10, To
Forfeit $290,000
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon
BBC
- Guardian
UK - Honduras
- The
Source
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
September 8– Charged
with demanding bribes to join
the United Brotherhood of
Carpenters and Joiners of
America, Salvatore Tagliaferro
has begun trial before U.S.
District Court for the
Southern District of New York
Judge Paul A. Crotty.
On April
21 Inner City Press up in the
courtroom published:
"day ended as witness
described planning with
Tagliaferro, in Brooklyn, to
charge $600 fees "into our
pockets... Our motive? To make
some money." 2 big guys
laugh."
On
April 28: "TAGLIAFERRO, the
president of Local 926 chapter
of the United Brotherhood of
Carpenters and Joiners of
America (the “Union”), was
found guilty today in
Manhattan federal court of
honest services wire fraud,
conversion of union assets,
and conspiracy, in connection
with his involvement in a
scheme to solicit cash bribes
from hundreds of prospective
members in exchange for union
membership. The jury
convicted TAGLIAFERRO today
following a one-week trial
before U.S. District Judge
Paul A. Crotty.
TAGLIAFERRO is scheduled to
appear for sentencing before
Judge Crotty."
It was
pushed to September 8 and
Inner City Press went and live
tweeted it here:
Now at sentencing
of Tagliaferro for his
Carpenters Union
corruption @SDNYLIVE .
Inner City Press covered the
trial. Now his lawyer says
charging him for Union's legal
fees would be unfair.
Defense: He
unionized more people than
anyone. He had plans to run
for Union President. Probation
would be enough. AUSA: Let's
talk about the victims -as Mr.
Rosenberg didn't. The Union
was a victim. We seek $290,000
[approx], from Mr DeFalco too.
Tagliaferro
(sobbing) I wish I'd never
trusted John DeFalco. I did
not know that animal was
taking money. Only the
District Council has a problem
with me. I stood up to
corruption. I am innocent.
(Slamming defense table).
Judge Crotty: I
think the jury was correct. I
was a member of the Teamsters.
I sentence you to 60 months,
two years of supervised
release. Forfeit $296,400.
Restitution of $145,065.33.
Back on April 26,
after the government's
closing, Tagliaferro's lawyer
Susan Kellman noted that the
jury consists of "11 women and
a black man," and that women's
weren't allowed on juries
until 1957. Then she tore into
cooperating witness John
DeFalco, quoting him about his
home as big as a school - with
a dock, no less.
She
portrayed Tagliaferro as
increasingly powerless, 200 of
his members taken, and DeFalco
as the one selling union
books. He was in Puerto Rico,
she said, "not dropping paper
towels from helicopters" but
volunteering. Tagliaferro
nodded to five family members
/ supporters in the front row.
There was
talk of a leak in SDNY - we'll
have more on this.
Back on March 30,
Judge Crotty ruled on various
motions in limine: "OPINION
& ORDER as to Salvatore
Tagliaferro. The Court DENIES
the Government's motion in
limine to introduce the
Defendant's 1997 conviction as
impeachment evidence against
the Defendant or any character
witnesses, should they elect
to testify at trial. The 1997
conviction is inadmissible for
all purposes. The Court GRANTS
the Government's motion in
limine to introduce the two
kickback schemes as subjects
of cross-examination against
character witnesses. The Court
DENIES Tagliaferro's
cross-motion to exclude
evidence about the Contracting
Kickback in the Government's
case-in-chief. The Court
DEFERS judgment on the
Government's motion in limine
to preclude or otherwise limit
testimony regarding the
Defendant's prior activities
as a confidential informant."
Now on March 31,
this: "SEALING ORDER as to
Salvatore Tagliaferro. This
order GRANTS the parties'
request to file the following
material under seal: the
Government's supplemental
motion in limine ("SML"),
Tagliaferro's response (Def.'s
Resp. dated Mar. 25, 2021),
and the Government's reply
(Gov't's Reply dated Mar. 28,
2021) (collectively, "the
Briefing"), along with
Tagliaferro's ex parte letter
dated March 25, 2021 (the "Ex
Parte Letter"). The Court has
weighed the presumption of
public access to these
judicial documents against the
risk that public disclosure
would present a significant
risk to (1) Tagliaferro's
safety, (2) the safety of a
potential defense witness, and
(3) law enforcement efforts."
Inner City
Press will be pushing that
this in-person trial also be
open to the press and public
by phone, given COVID. It is
not either / or. Watch this
site.
This case is USA
v. Tagliaferro, et al.,
19-cr-472 (Crotty)
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2021 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|
,
