Sacha
Baron Cohen Gets Summary
Judgment In Roy Moore Lawsuit,
Citing 1st Amendment
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon,
thread,
II
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
July 13 – Roy Moore's
defamation lawsuit against
Sacha Baron Cohen was ended in
the U.S.
District Court
for the
Southern
District of
New York on
July 13 as
Judge John P.
Cronan
granted Cohen
summary judgment:
"Defendants
have moved for
summary
judgment,
arguing that
Plaintiffs’
claims are
barred
by both a
waiver clause
in the
agreement that
Judge Moore
signed prior
to the
interview and
also by
the First
Amendment of
the U.S.
Constitution.
The Court
agrees that
Judge Moore’s
claims
are
barred by the
unambiguous
contractual
language,
which
precludes the
very causes of
action
he now
brings.
Although Kayla
Moore was not
a signatory to
that contract,
her claims are
barred
by the
First
Amendment.
Accordingly,
Defendants’
motion is
granted in its
entirety."
Order on Inner
City Press'
DocumentCloud
here.
Update: soon
after the
order, this:
"NOTICE OF
APPEAL.
Document filed
by Kayla
Moore, Roy
Stewart Moore.
Filing fee $
505.00,
receipt number
ANYSDC-24786422.
Form C and
Form D are due
within 14 days
to the Court
of Appeals,
Second
Circuit..(Klayman,
Larry)."
Inner
City Press has
covered the
case
throughout,
initially
before SDNY
Judge Andrew
L. Carter,
live tweeted here.
On
December,
with the case
reassigned
to new(er)
SDNY Judge John P.
Cronan,
another
conference was
held, which
Inner City
Press also
covered and
live tweeted,
here.
On
June 10, 2021,
Judge Cronan
held a proceeding and
Inner City
Press again
covered it. He
will not be
recusing himself, but
expect the
video of
Cohen's deposition to
be released. Short podcast here;
Thread
here and
below
Now on
June 18 -
Juneteenth - Moore's
lawyer Klayman
has submitted
to Judge
Cronan as
supplemental
authority a
1984 Fifth
Circuit case,
Braun
v. Flynn, F.2d
245, saying
it concerns "a
novelty
entertainer
who performed
an act with a
swimming pig at a
family
oriented
amusement park
sued a sexual
oriented men's
magazine for
defamation for
publishing
her photo in
its 'Chic Thrills'
section" -
and won.
Judge Carter on
August 1 summoned each party's
lawyers to his robing room,
first together then one by
one, ex parte. When
they emerged a schedule was
set. Klayman's pro hac vice
application is due on August
8, and then on August 22 the
status of the case, including
if the party's consent to
referral to an SDNY Magistrate
Judge.
Inner City Press
afterward in the hall outside
Judge Carter's courtroom asked
Klayman if he or his client
are amenable to referral to a
Magistrate. Klayman told Inner
City Press that he found Judge
Carter to be fair, emphasizing
that was on the record, he
would like it
reported.
When Inner City
Press asked about a separate
disciplinary action pending in
the District of Columbia
Klayman said it was a
complaint by a dissatisfied
client who sued Voice of
America and said he had gotten
Gloria Alred, who was at the
SDNY this week speaking to the
press about Jeffrey Epstein,
to express support for
him.
Klayman's Law Group, with an
American flag on the business
card he gave to Inner City
Press, has offices in
Washington and Florida.
Whether the long ago
interchange with Judge Chin
will or should have an impact
on this case in the SDNY in
2019 in a question for another
day. August 8, to be precise.
This case
is Moore et al. v. Cohen
et al., 19-cv-4977
(Cronan).
***
Feedback: Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
Box
20047, Dag Hammarskjold Station NY
NY 10017
Other, earlier Inner
City Press are listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2019 Inner
City Press, Inc. To request reprint or
other permission, e-contact Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com for
|