After
Wikileaks Trial Schulte SCIF Time Is Cut
Based On Sealed US Request Judge Explains
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon Thread Song
Decrypt
- Q&A
- Pod
- Brutal
Kangaroo Book
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
Sept 29 – When jury selection
was completed for the retrial
of accused CIA Vault 7 leaker
Joshua Schulte, U.S. District
Court for the Southern
District of New York Judge
Jesse M. Furman told the
jurors, Do not read or say
anything about the case. Inner
City Press was there.
[July 20 denial
of access here;
Brutal
Kangaroo]
On July 25 after
conviction Schulte sent his
own letter to Judge Furman
that "we intend to seek
immediate sentencing on the
counts of conviction" and that
he wants "once-weekly SCIF
days as the CP case has
classified forensic evidence -
home computers and servers
that were 'classified.'"
Co-stand
by counsel Colson, meanwhile,
asking Judge Furman "to be
relieved as counsel in
connection with Mr. Schulte's
child pornography case," and
offering to filing a
supplemental letter under
seal.
The government,
too, goes under seal -
apparently without noting it
in the docket. On September
28, Schulte's hard working
stand-by counsel wrote to
Judge Furman that she was
informed on September 26 at
8:18 am that "Mr. Schulte
would not be produced for his
scheduled 8 am SCIF
appointment... based on a
sealed order."
Judge Furman
responded, into the docket,
asking if anything can be
disclosed to the defendant.
But what about the public?
"Sealed Document re:
Government's Ex Parte/Sealed
Letter relating to Docket
Entry #
949...ENDORSEMENT...ECF No.
949 is the Government's ex
parte and sealed application,
with the Court's endorsement,
both ordering that Mr. Schulte
not be produced to the SCIF
prior to October 7, 2022, and
directing the Clerk to file
and maintain the endorsed
application under seal until
further notice of the Court.
All of that is to say, the
Court has already approved the
Government's seeking relief ex
parte and under seal. That
said, no later than September
30, 2022, the Government shall
file a letter addressing
whether or when ECF No. 949
can be disclosed to Defendant,
whether in redacted form or
unredacted form; and whether
there is any reason to
withhold from Defendant the
identity of the AUSAs who
filed the application. The
Clerk of Court is directed to
terminate Docket No. 951.
(Signed by Judge Jesse M.
Furman on 9/28/22)." Watch
this site.
Back on August 7
Schulte's lead counsel
requested, and August 8 Judge
Furman endorsed, "On July 28,
2022, Mr. Schulte was handed a
search warrant, and his laptop
from the Metropolitan
Detention Center located in
the Eastern District of New
York was seized by the
government." Full letter on
Patreon here.
On August 30, the
US Attorney's Office wrote to
Judge Furman: "Dear Judge
Furman: The Government writes
in response to the Court’s
order, dated August 26, 2022,
directing the Government to
provide an update regarding
the review of the defendant’s
laptop pursuant to a search
warrant (the “Warrant”) issued
by a magistrate judge in the
Eastern District of New York
for the search and seizure of
the defendant’s laptop. The
Government’s review of the
laptop remains ongoing."
On August 31
Judge Furman ordered: "MEMO
ENDORSEMENT as to Joshua Adam
Schulte on [937] LETTER MOTION
re Proposed PreTrial Motion
Schedule: The parties shall
appear for a conference on
September 7, 2022, at 3 p.m.
in Courtroom 1105 of the
Thurgood Marshall United
States Courthouse."
Inner City Press
went, and now provides this
summary two hours later. Judge
Furman admonished Schulte for
his letter, docketed on
September 6 by the Pro Se
Office but dated July 31,
which among other things
called the Government "c*ck
hungry." Letter on Inner City
Press' DocumentCloud here.
Judge Furman said Schulte
might forfeit his right to
represent himself.
Schulte
said the laptop they seized
had never been connected to
the Internet. In the EDNY
there is now a proceeding
about the search warrant, on
which we hope to have more.
Judge
Furman declined to direct that
Schulte get another air-gapped
laptop, but adjourned the
post-trial motion schedule
"sine die."
He was
told that Schulte's family may
retain counsel for the next
(Sept 11, 2023) trial. Judge
Furman said that would not
change the schedule.
The US
Attorney's Office is to
provide an update on the
laptop by September 12.
On September 12,
the US filed a letter starting
"The Government’s review of
the laptop remains ongoing,
and at this time we are not in
a position to estimate the
time frame required to
complete the review." Full
letter on Inner City Press'
DocumentCloud here.
Docketed on
September 19 was Schulte's
response, "I cannot agree to
the government's 'offer' of a
replacement laptop as it would
not allow me to work on my
motions." What next?
Back on August 5
Judge Furman relieved previous
co-stand-by counsel Colson,
but declined her suggestion
that David Stern be her
replacement: "ORDER as to
Joshua Adam Schulte. On July
25, 2022, the Court received a
motion from Deborah Colson to
be relieved as defense
counsel. See Doc. No. 886. The
Court granted the application
but reserved judgment on
whether or whom to appoint in
Ms. Colson's place. The Court
concludes that new Criminal
Justice Act counsel is
appropriate and hereby
appoints Caesar De Castro the
CJA lawyer on duty today (who
has the appropriate security
clearance as well). (Signed by
Judge Jesse M. Furman on
8/5/22)." It's for the CP
case.
Vlog (shot in
Brooklyn by EDNY) here.
Back at the
beginning of the re-trial:
Judge Furman: I'm going to
announce the selected jurors.
[He reads out 16 names. Inner
City Press took fast notes -
on on Patreon here]
Inner City
Press filed
opposing
the sealing of
the courtroom
for CIA
witnesses, and
once the
witnesses
begin
anticipates
making other
filings.
The June 14, 2022
opening arguments, as live
tweeted by Inner City Press,
are here.
On June 15,
Schulte in his own defense
engaged in his first cross
examination, of FBI Agent
Evanchec. Inner City Press
live tweeted it here.
On June 16,
Schulte completed his cross of
Evanchec - then the US put on
CIA supervisor Anthony Leonis
in a (mostly) sealed
courtroom, Inner City Press
which seeks to unseal was
there then later live tweeted
here.
On June 17,
Leonis finished his direct and
was cross examined by Schulte,
with a deadline to finish
before the end of the trial
day. Inner City Press live
tweeted it here.
On June 21,
MITRE's (and now Microsoft's)
Patrick Leedom did direct and
then some cross examination by
Schulte. Inner City Press live
tweeted here.
On June 24 the
trial resumed and Inner City
Press live tweeted here.
On June 27, FBI
agent Michael Berger was cross
examined, thread here.
On June 28, Day
8, the courtroom went sealed
again, and without at least
one of the feeds that was
supposed to exist. Inside,
"Jeremy Weber" was being
cross-examined by Schulte. At
day's end Schulte told Judge
Furman he has ten more pages
of questions for Weber, after
finishing with 50 pages.
The next witness, too, is
sealed. But Inner City Press
is staying on the case, and
the background (see a launch
of sorts, here).
On June 29,
Schulte cross examined Weber
at the opening, and waited for
cooperator Carlos, about use
of cell phone(s) in MCC, at
the end. Inner City Press live
tweeted, here.
On June 30,
Schulte cross examined
Betances, then FBI Special
Agent Schlessinger, thread here
On July 6, both
sides rested after questions,
which Inner City Press live
tweeted here
and below. Inner
City Press is
covering the
trial(s) and
writing a book(let)
about it
On July 7, the
closing arguments, which Inner
City Press live tweeted here.
Filed July 7, but
docketed on July 8, this:
Josh Schulte's pro se filing
to Judge Furman about National
Defense Information, asking,
If the government maintained
recipes for hot chocolate
under lock and key, could they
charge an individual for
leaking that recipe under the
Espionage Act?
On July 8, Judge
Furman read his legal
instructions to the jury and
they began deliberating, first
asking for a market then the
testimony of US expert witness
Leedom. Inner City Press live
tweeted it here.
On
Monday, July
11, the jury
came in from 9
to 5 but did
not ask a single
question. Tale
told from the
inside here,
Patreon here.
On
Tuesday, July
12, the jury
asked for the
transcript of
witness Berger
- and a
question about
"substantial step(s)."
Inner City
Press live
tweeted here.
On Wednesday,
July 13, after
a question
about the
grand jury subpoena,
the jury returned
with a verdict,
nine of them -
all guilty.
Inner City
Press was there,
and live
tweeted it, here:
#breaking:
In CIA
#Wikileaks
re-trial of
Joshua
Schulte, there
is a verdict.
But it hasn't
been announced
yet. Inner
City Press has
covered the
case, heading
to courtroom
for verdict
now...
US V
SCHULTE COUNTS
1 TO 9 GUILTY
ON ALL COUNTS
There
are 2 extra US
Marshals
behind
Schulte, for a
total of four.
Jury exiting
Judge
Furman: No
sentencing
date, given
the other
charges
pending.
Status
conference set
for July 26 at
3 pm.
Adjourned. Brutal
Kangaroo
book here.
On July
15, Judge
Furman mentioned but did
not docket and
apparently
will not
release a
submission to
him about the case:
"On July 15,
2022, the
Court received
an email from
a member of
the public
purporting to
have
information
about this
case. The
Court will
provide the
email to both
parties.
Absent an
application
from either
party, the
Court does not
intend to take
any other
action in
connection
with the
email. In
light of that,
there is no
right of
public access
to the email
and it will
remain under
seal unless
and until the
Court orders
otherwise."
The argument, as in
US v.
Edwards, was
and is
"non-judicial
document."
An interested
media would
have to be pretty
lame to see a
docket entry
like that and
not make at least
a request to unseal
the e-mail.
Inner City
Press on July
20 made a request
that the email
be unsealed,
arguing that
"access to the
[document
might]
materially
assist the
public in
understanding
the issues
beofre the ...
court, and in
evaluating the
fairness and
integrity of
the court's
proceedings."
Bernstein
v. Bernstein
Litowitz
Berger &
Crossman LLP,
814 F.3d 132,
139-40 (2d
Cir. 2016)
(quoting
Newsday LLC v.
Cnty. of
Nassau, 730
F.3d 156,
166-67 (2d
Cir. 2013)
(alterations
in original)."
Judge Furman
denied it:
"ENDORSED
LETTER as to
Joshua Adam
Schulte
addressed to
Judge Jesse M.
Furman from
Matthew
Russell Lee,
Inner City
Press dated
7/20/22 re:
Press request
to docket and
unseal the
email received
by the Court
on July 15,
2022
"purporting to
have
information
about" US v.
Schulte,
17-cr-548
(JMF)...
ENDORSEMENT:
Application
DENIED. It is
well
established
that the mere
filing of a
paper or
document with
the court is
insufficient
to render that
paper a
judicial
document
subject to the
right of
public access.
United States
v. Amodeo, 44
F.3d 141, 145
(2d Cir.
1995).
Instead, an
item filed
must be
relevant to
the
performance of
the judicial
function and
useful in the
judicial
process in
order for it
to be
designated a
judicial
document. Id.
In light of
that standard,
there is no
basis to
conclude that
the
unsolicited
email --
which, for all
the Court
knows, is from
a random
member of the
public with no
connection to
this case --
is a judicial
document. That
is, absent
some basis to
believe that
the email is
legitimate and
that the
author of the
email actually
does have
information
pertinent to
this case, the
email has no
relevance to
the judicial
function or
use in the
judicial
process.
Accordingly,
the
application is
DENIED. SO
ORDERED.
(Signed by
Judge Jesse M.
Furman on
7/20/22)." One
might ask, if it
was enough to
mention in the
docket, what
is the benefit
of keeping
it sealed, in
terms of court
transparency? It
had to be
asked.
(By
comparison,
SDNY Judge John G.
Koletl on July
25 in another case
docketed an
over the transom submission,
behind
an order
stating "The
Court received
the attached
letter, which
it forwards to
the parties" -
publicly. We are
inquiring into
the difference.)
Judge
Furman in
response to
Inner City
Press request
to unseal all
of Schulte's
civil case
ordered in
part that ".On
July 5, 2022,
Matthew
Russell Lee,
representing
Inner City
Press,
submitted
the
attached
request to
unseal certain
documents
filed in this
case. The case
was sealed
before
being
reassigned to
the
undersigned.
The Court
concludes that
there is no
reason for the
majority
of the
docket to
remain under
seal, and it
will now be
unsealed. The
sole exception
is Plaintiff’s
submission at
ECF No. 2-1,
which is
undergoing
review. If,
after review,
the Court
concludes
that it need
not be sealed,
the Court will
promptly enter
an order
unsealing it."
A week
later, and no
order, no
further unsealing.
Coverage will
continue.
Here's from
Judge Furman June 13 Order:
"as discussed on the record at
the classified hearing
held on June 8, 2022,
the Court concludes that the
particular statement Defendant
seeks to admit is
admissible. The Court further
concludes that the information
should likely be admitted as
a stipulation, which
would give Defendant
“substantially the same
ability to make his defense
as would disclosure of ”
a portion of the document
itself, pursuant to CIPA
Section 6(c). See 18.
U.S.C. app. 3 § 6(c).
Accordingly, the parties shall
propose an agreed upon
stipulation or competing
stipulations for the Court’s
approval no later than June
17, 2022."
Previously, in
the conclusion of the month
long trial of accused CIA
leaker Joshua Schulte, on the
morning of March 9, 2020 the
jury returned guilty verdicts
on Counts 8 and 10, with
mistrial granted on all other
counts. U.S. District Court
for the Southern District of
New York Judge Paul A. Crotty
set March 26 for the next
date.
Then it was moved
to April 22 (then May 18).
March 9 thread here.
Song here.
Back on
April 13, 2022, Judge Furman
held a conference with Schulte
present. Inner City Press live
tweeted it here....
[And see
its Oct 15 MCC video here]
On March
2, 2021 were the closing
arguments [in the first
trial], which Inner City Press
tweeted, thread here
More on
Patreon here.
See Inner City
Press filing into the docket
on Big Cases Bot, here.
Watch this site. The case is US
v. Schulte, 17-cr-548
(Furman).
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2020 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|