To
SDNY T-Mobile Whistleblower Writes of Visa
Workers and Sexual Abuse Into Docket
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Exclusive Patreon
BBC
- Guardian
UK - Honduras
- The
Source
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
Jan 27 – During the T-Mobile /
Sprint merger trial,
whistleblowers within Sprint
approached Inner City Press
with complaints out how they
say the public would face
higher prices, and said the
plaintiff States are dropping
the ball. See below.
Now on
January 27 into the docket
goes this: "ENDORSED LETTER
addressed to Judge Victor
Marrero from Manish Dube dated
1/23/2020 re: I am writing to
you today to report
fundamental 'wrongs' in the
inner and departmental working
of T-Mobile. I have had the
misfortune to be employed for
T-Mobile and have witnessed
glaring abuses of American
fundamentals which is company
wide in the Information
Technology sector and in its
workings. Abuses such as
awarding of contract jobs to
visa holder companies, which
in turn promotes taking jobs
away from the American
citizens' in the US. Senior
leadership (VP levels and up)
involved in contract award
scams. Allegations of Senior
leadership involved in female
visa worker sexual assault
incidents. (The visa workers
are not able to come forward
for fear of losing their
American dream). The blatant
hiring of immigrant friends
and friends of immigrant
coworkers with out basic
checks and balances promoting
the workplace to be reverse
racist. Targeting of African
-American's in the Information
Technology organization using
subversive means. Employees
who complained about such
wrongdoings were either
quieted with a pay package or
were terminated citing edge
case rule/s. T-Mobile a
company who's fundamentals'
are so morally wrong could
never do any long term good
for the greatest Nation on
this earth; THE UNITED STATES
OF AMERICA. Strengthening a
company with such values will
be synonymous to feeding a
future curse. For the above
reasons and many more such
reasons that I am unable to
articulate, Sprint's merger
with T-Mobile is not in the
best interest of our Nation. I
hope I was able to communicate
to you in the right spirit and
be of help to my United States
of America. 3924 Ashford
Dunwoody Rd Atlanta, GA 30319
716-574- ENDORSEMENT: The
Clerk of Court is directed to
enter into the public record
of this action the letter
above submitted to the Court
by Manish Dube. So Ordered.
(Signed by Judge Victor
Marrero on 1/27/2020) "
We'll have more on this. In
December, one issue raised to
and published by Inner City
Press involved Sprint's
extensive 850 megahertz
spectrum and the ways it has
found to use it - all to be
discarded and made more
expensive if T-Mobile takes it
over.
Prior to cutting spending in
connection with - or in order
to help gain approval for -
the current merger proposal
with T-Mobile, the
whistleblowers say, Sprint
found ways to use the spectrum
it has, including small cell
technology from providers like
Florida-based Airspan and a
company in Taiwan.
All of this is to jettisoned
if the merger is approved, and
more expensive contracts with
Nokia and Ericsson. The
whistleblowers asked Inner
City Press, having read its live
coverage of Sprint and
SoftBank testimony at the
trial before U.S. District
Court for the Southern
District of New York Judge
Victor Marrero, How can those
costs not ultimately be passed
on to consumers?
Inner City
Press in turn asked them, Why
haven't the plaintiff states
raises these issues? The
states didn't get or talk to
the right experts, one
proffered. Another said that
in her view, New York and
California are just trying to
salvage some side deals on
call centers and job
retention, not protect
consumers on price.
Meanwhile,
they say, spending within
Sprint is being cut in as if
to bring things in line with
the "damaged goods"
presentation by Sprint and
SoftBank bring presented to
Judge Marrero, and live
tweeted by Inner City Press.
One asked, Is this legal, to
begin coordinating in this way
even during the trial?
More on Patreon here.
Other whistleblowers, from
other parts of the proposed
merger and from the wider
industry, are starting to come
forward - watch this
site. The case is State
of New York, et al., v.
Deutsche Telekom AG, et al.,
19-cv-5434 (Marrero).
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2019 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|