In Trial of
Manafort Lender, Calk Complained of MSNBC,
Now US Says Maddow Is Just Opinion
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon
Podcast
II
BBC
- Guardian
UK - Honduras
- ESPN
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
June 28 – After months of preliminaries,
the trial of Stephen Calk for
conspiracy to trade his bank's
loans to Paul Manafort for the
Secretary of the Army position
began on June 23. Inner City
Press live tweeted, here,
previous coverage here,
podcast here
Then the defense
opening statement and first
witness, here,
and Inner City Press question
to Calk on Scaramucci, here
(& Alamy photo here)
On June 24 came
the direct examination of
Anthony Scaramucci, which
Inner City Press live tweeted
here
(podast here)
and below.
While the
trial did not meet on Friday
June 25, and will not on
Tuesday June 29, Calk's
counsel on June 27 filed an
objection - to MSNBC: "It has
come to our attention that on
the evening of Friday, June
25, 2021, following the
conclusion of trial
proceedings for the week, The
Rachel Maddow Show aired an
approximately fifteen-minute
television segment on MSNBC
regarding the case.1 The
segment is a highly
inflammatory and prejudicial
editorial regarding last
week’s proceedings, offering
one-sided commentary, which
contains factual errors, on
the testimony of the witnesses
who have appeared thus far,
and essentially concluding
that Mr. Calk is guilty.
2 In addition, the
segment makes reference to and
displays a document that,
while introduced by the
government into evidence at
the outset of the trial
pursuant to the Court’s
procedures, has not yet
been See. e.g., Exhibit
A at minute 9:44 (“The guy who
he was offering federal
government positions to, if
the guy would only pay Paul
Manafort, the guy put in
writing what exact jobs he
wanted in exchange for his
bank’s money, which he was
stuffing in Paul Manafort’s
pockets.”); id. at 9:02
(“There’s a federal government
interest in making sure that
banks don’t get ripped off by
people who are using banks as
piggybanks to pay for
government jobs, which you’re
not supposed to be able to
buy, and if you are supposed
to be able to buy them, you
shouldn’t be able to buy them
by giving the money to Paul
freaking Manafort. But that
was the Trump campaign.”).
published to the
jury.3 The segment also
refers to testimony by Ms.
Ivakhnik to which the defense
objected – an objection that
the Court sustained and thus
will be stricken from the
transcript. (Compare June 24,
2021 Trial Tr. at 208:4-10
(Ivakhnik testimony that
Brennan told her “to hold onto
all emails or to save all
emails because the FBI will be
looking into this”) to Exhibit
A at minute 7:48-8:03)."
There is a list,
see above, of positions Calk
wanted including, as a low
down Ambassadorship, that of
US Ambassador to the UN...
The US did one
too: full letter here on
Patreon here.
And now on June
28 the US says a Gaggi inquiry
may not be needed, since the
Maddow segment does not
contain any information
because what the jury heard at
trial "although it does
contain OPINION that would not
be admitted at trial." Any
inquiry, it seems, will be in
open court. Watch this site.
AUSA: What did
Mr. Manafort ask you to do for
Mr. Calk? Scaramucci: He
wanted Secretary of the Army,
but since that wasn't
available, we moved down.
AUSA: What was your
relationship with Mr.
Manafort? Scaramucci: He was
good to me on the campaign. I
wanted to help
AUSA: Who is
1202? Scaramucci: Paul
Manafort. AUSA: When did you
get involved in the campaign?
Scaramucci: Mid to late May of
2016.
AUSA: Who
asked you to join? Scaramucci:
Donald Trump. He asked me on
the 26th floor of Trump Tower.
We used 5 and 14 as our HQ.
AUSA: When did
you meet Paul Manafort?
Scaramucci: Mid-May. I went to
see Mr. Trump and I met Mr.
Manafort on the 26th floor. I
had been working for Jeb Bush
but he dropped out. So Mr.
Trump asked me to join. I
shook Mr. Manafort's hand
Scaramucci: On
election night I was at my
restaurant, the Hunt &
Fish Club. I went to an NYT
event, then with Louise Linton
and my wife, to the NY Hilton,
6th and 54th, for big donors.
There was cautious optimism.
It seemed it would fall to
Florida.
AUSA: How
did the mood change?
Scaramucci: I was with Mayor
Giuliani on the couch, he said
it was likely Trump would win.
The NYT dial [needle] was
moving for Trump. By 11 pm,
the mood was happier. Hillary
Clinton did not concede. But
Mr. Trump spoke at 2 am.
AUSA: Did you
stay on the transition?
Scaramucci: Yes. [In the court
room, Calk in mask is staring
at Scaramucci in the
plexiglass witness box.
Scaramucci: I was
on the Tiger Team, with Martin
Silverstein and John Sweeney
from update New York, to
interview deputy secretaries
in Trump Tower on the 14th and
15th floor.
AUSA: Did you
recommend anyone? Scaramucci:
Vincent Viola for Secretary of
Army. Scaramucci: But he owned
the Florida Panthers and
racehorses. He withdrew. Judge
Schofield: Let's take our
afternoon break. Thread will
continue.
Jury's
back. AUSA: Mr. Scaramucci,
I'll ask you to read this
message. Scaramucci: "How is 2
pm today."
AUSA: What was
Mr. Manafort asking for?
Scaramucci: A face to face
meeting with me. AUSA: Did you
meet? Scaramucci: Yes. There
was no discussion of Steve
Calk
AUSA: And
this one. Scaramucci: Dec 14,
2016, "Call me on 917 [we are
omitting], this is my second
cell, Paul." AUSA: Did you
call him? Scaramucci: Yes. He
recommended Steve Calk and one
Vernon Parker.
Scaramucci:
I told Mr. Manafort I had
recommended Vincent Viola. I
asked Mr. Manafort to text me.
I was being inundated with
requests. AUSA: Did Mr.
Manafort tell you he had
gotten million in loans from
Steve Calk's bank? Scaramucci:
No.
AUSA: Next
message. Scaramucci: Vernon
Parker, DOJ, Deputy AG
position. And Calk for deputy
secretary of the Army, or
personnel, DOD. AUSA: GX 611.
Scaramucci: "Any
progress on Stephen Calk? Did
you speak with him?" I'm the
blue bubbles [in the text
messages]. Scaramucci: When I
wrote, "Would he take under
secretary of the Army. If so,
I think we could get it done,"
I meant get him the interview.
It would have been up to
General Jim Mattis.
AUSA: Response?
Scaramucci: 29 minutes later
he said yes, He will take it.
AUSA: Did
you hear from Steve Cortes
about Mr. Calk? Scaramucci: I
did. I knew Steve Cortes from
CNBC. He had been working for
Rick Perry, then he came to
the Trump campaign. AUSA: Did
Steve Cortes follow up?
Scaramucci: No. But Mr.
Manafort did.
AUSA: Did
you speak with Mr. Calk on
December 27, 2016? Scaramucci:
Yes. He tried to name people
we might have had in common.
Perhaps Steve Cortes came up
in the call. I needed his CV
or a paragraph from his bio,
to get him into the Tiger
Team.
AUSA: DX
249. Scaramucci: It's
from Steve Calk, Dec 28, 2016.
It says, "Re: Steve Calk
Under-Sec Army." The body
says, Here's links to my work
on the President-Elect in the
last year. There's a link to a
coverage book. AUSA: DX
249a.
Scaramucci: CNBC
screen shot Scaramucci: The
economic team. It's like when
I worked for the Romney
campaign. One these you put,
in bucket one, economic
advisers like Peter Navaro.
Then two, like Stephen Ross.
Then bucket three,
fundraisers.
Scaramucci:
We had Stephen Moore, Navaro,
and Malpass - he went on
to the World Bank. Navaro had
an office in the executive
branch of the White
House. AUSA: What about
Wilbur Ross? Scaramucci:
Secretary of Commerce.
AUSA: New topic -
but there are only ten minutes
left. Judge Schofield: Let's
start. Everyone minute is
precious.
AUSA: What did
Mr. Calk want to speak with
you about? Scaramucci: Getting
the interview. He wrote, Happy
New Year, hope to hear from
you soon.
Scaramucci:
Jan 23, 2017 he wrote to me
about Ambassadorships.
AUSA: GX 314, and 609. Zoom
in. Scaramucci: It says,
preferred roles, I'd prefer to
speak with you live,
312. Then he wrote,
Checking to see if I'm still
in the game.
Judge
Schofield: We're adjourned
until Tuesday.
The case is US v. Calk, 19-cr-366
(Schofield)
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2021 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
|