Brooklyn
Literary Agent Weronika Janczuk Detained
Again, Threat to Press After DPA
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon Maxwell
Book
BBC
- Guardian
UK - Complaint
- DPA
Deal
SDNY Exclusive,
Oct 4 – Brooklyn based
literary agent Weronika
Janczuk was
arrested on January 11, 2022
for cyber-stalking.
On July 21 the US
Attorney's Office agreed to
defer prosecuting her.
To some, it stood
in contrast to a
contemporaneous prosecution
for alleged telephone threat
to a theater / screening in
Manhattan. The basis of the
decision is not known. Deferred
Prosecution
Agreement on
Inner City
Press'
DocumentCloud,
here.
In
September,
after the DPA,
Janczuk
emailed a
series of
threats to
Inner City
Press, as well
as demands for
censorship:
"Please pull
all content: here
Weronika
Janczuk Sun,
Sep 11, 11:11
AM to
editorial,
jwolf
Please pull
immediately,
also: here
The content
sent herein is
legal in
nature and
intent, and is
protected from
publication by
e-channel'd
privacy &
security laws,
IP
protections,
and
positively-declared
NDA statutes."
The
cc-ed jworf
replied, "Dear
Amy [of
MacMillan) and
Inner City
Press – I
imagine I have
received this
email because
I’m the
outside
general
counsel for
the American
Association of
Literary
Agents. (I’m
cc’ing our
President,
Jennifer
Weltz, on
this.) I
have no idea
what this
email means or
even what it’s
about. Ms.
(Dr?) Janczuk
is not a
member of our
organization."
On
October 4,
this: "Minute
Entry for
proceedings
held before
Magistrate
Judge
Katharine H.
Parker:
Pretrial
Release
Violation
Hearing as to
Weronika
Janczuk held
on 10/4/2022.
Deft Appears
with Federal
Defender
Sylvie Levine
by Clay
Kaminsky and
AUSA Edward
Robinson for
the
government.
Detention on
Consent w/o
Prejudice."
How was
a deferred
prosecution
agreement
allowed in
this case, and
denied in
others? Watch
this site.
In the
complaint, the
prosecutors
quoted the
defendant
telling the target,
"I swear I
will kill
you... I will
seriously
castrate you."
Complaint now
on Inner City
Press'
DocumentCloud
here.
It
emerges that
people who
should have
been told of
the impending
DPA and
release,
weren't.
According
to the DPA,
Janczuk should
have no
contact with
Duncan Sahner,
Elizabeth
Sahner,
Christian
Sahner, Brigid
Casey, Ronald
Sahner, Thomas
Phillips,
Sarah Jane
Sahner. Also,
no contact
with any
employee of
Abdiel Capital
including
Colin Moran,
Geoff &
Lauren
Gentile, Peter
& Lindsay
Snedeker,
David
Escamilla,
David Chi,
David Mosher,
Natalie
Dabkowski,
Albert
Horsting,
Rachel
Leichner,
Connor
Cucalon, Megan
Clarine,
Robert
Kriegsman,
Jihym Kim,
Charlotte
Burke, Tori
Mercado,
Stephen
Pascoe.
She
is not go to
78 Durand
Road,
Maplewood NJ
07040; Abdiel
Capital, 90
Park Avenue,
NY 10016,
Lathan &
Watkins, 1271
Avenue of the
Americas,
10020 and St.
Vincent Ferrer
Church, 869
Lexington
Avenue, NY NY
10065.
But
before the DPA
was rubber
stamped, there
was no notice
in the docket
at all. We'll
have more on
these
contradictions.
At 7 pm that
night she was told she would
be a "guest of the government"
overnight, until she can be
fitted with a location
monitoring GPS bracelet. Inner
City Press was there - as it
was on March 22, when
Janczuk's request to represent
herself was not granted.
Instead, she is being
referred, still in detention,
for a psychological
examination. As of the March
22 proceeding, her requests
were not in the public docket.
On March 22
between 2 and 3 pm, Janczuk
stood before SDNY Magistrate
Judge Barbara Moses. She
insisted she wanted to
represent herself. Judge Moses
inquired, but then declined to
grant the request, pending a
psychological exam, citing US
v. Barnes, 693 F.3d 261, 270.
Judge Moses asked
the Federal Defender and AUSA
to submit a draft order for
the exam, naming a licensed
practitioner. Inner City Press
mused, in writing, Will that
go into the docket?
Nothing until
April 4: "ORDER as to Weronika
Janczuk: it is hereby ORDERED
that a psychiatric examination
be conducted by Dr. Paradis of
Ms. Janczuk at MDC Brooklyn,
and that a report of such
examination, including Dr.
Paradis's opinion as to
whether Ms. Janczuk is
"competent to represent
[her]self at trial," United
States v. Barnes, 693 F.3d
261, 270 (2d Cir. 2012), be
provided to the Court under
seal; and it is further
ORDERED that the Court will
pay the cost of the evaluation
(at a rate of $400/hour, not
to exceed 15 hours); and it is
further ORDERED that the
Bureau of Prisons and MDC
Brooklyn will permit Dr.
Paradis to conduct an
evaluation either in person or
remotely with Ms. Janczuk
(Reg. No. 81379-509), and
during the examination, Dr.
Paradis is permitted to bring
and/or use the tools of her
examination, including but not
limited to a stopwatch,
notepad, blank paper, pencils,
pens, paper books and tests.
SO ORDERED. (Signed by
Magistrate Judge Barbara C.
Moses on 4/4/2022)."
The doctor
is Cheryl Paradis, Psy.D.
Forty days later,
no results - but on May 13 the
US Attorney's Office put in a
letter requesting another
continuance.
And on June 22,
this: "ORDER as to Weronika
Janczuk: Defendant Weronika
Janczuk, charged by complaint
with one count of making
threatening interstate
communications in violation of
18 U.S.C. ง 875(c) and one
count of cyberstalking in
violation of 18 U.S.C. งง
2261A(2)(A) and 2261A(2)(B),
has now sent four letters
directly to the undersigned
Magistrate Judge from the
Metropolitan Detention Center,
where she is detained. Because
the defendant is represented
by counsel, the Court will
forward all such letters to
her counsel and will not
docket them or further
consider them. The defendant
is reminded that all motions
and other requests for
judicial relief in her
criminal case must be
presented to the Court through
her counsel. If the defendant
wishes to file a civil action,
in which she is the plaintiff,
she may do so pro se. However,
a civil action cannot be
initiated by means of a letter
addressed to an individual
judge. (Signed by Magistrate
Judge Barbara C. Moses on
6/22/2022)."
Apparently, these
are not being deemed judicial
documents. We note, however,
that she tried to fire her
Federal Defender but is being
evaluated as to whether that
is a knowing decision. So in
one view, she is
incommunicado. Could she
sent her letter(s) to her
Federal Defender along with
the instruction to file them
on ECF? Or write to some
other(s)?
On July 13, the
US asked for another month,
saying in its declaration that
"defense counsel and I are
engaged in discussions
concerning a possible
disposition... we plan to
continue our discussions." But
didn't Janszuk move to fire
her appointed lawyer, and it
is delayed pending this
competency review? How can the
US be negotiating with defense
counsel in this context?
Inner City Press
remains on the case.
Back on January
11 she slammed the table and
was led into the holding cell
by two U.S. Marshals.
Inner City Press, the only
media in the public courtroom,
published an article about it
an hour later.
On January
14, Janczuk who is represented
by Federal Defender Sylvie
Jill Levine left a voicemail
making a threat. While Inner
City Press is not
unsympathetic toward this
defendant and others, court
proceedings and public and can
and should be reported.
On March
14 opposition was filed to an
application by Federal
Defenders for Janczuk which
had not itself been docketed.
And the opposition has a
sealed exhibit. But it states
among other things that
"The day after
she was released, the
defendant went in the middle
of the day to a particular
church, which is the Victim’s
place of worship. When
contacted by Pretrial Services
about her location there, the
defendant claimed that she had
been attending the church for
years. That explanation,
however, is inconsistent with
the fact that the Victim had
resided in Minnesota from 2019
to 2021;"
"A few days prior
to January 18, 2022, the
defendant left four voice mail
messages on Judge Moses’s
Chambers’s voicemail, one of
which was 15 minutes long and
two of which were 8 minutes
long. The number that left
those voicemails was the same
number assigned to the phone
that was seized incident to
the defendant’s arrest on
January 11. Lawfully obtained
GPS data for the phone
assigned that number showed
that the defendant was in New
Jersey from January 25 to 26.
Law enforcement was told by
the defendant’s roommate and
the superintendent for her
apartment that the defendant
was asking them about law
enforcement’s whereabouts;"
There's more. But
who was informed of FD's
application?
On March 21 the
belated docketed of a decision
taken on March 15, with the
underlying request still not
in the docket: "Minute Entry
for proceedings held before
Magistrate Judge Robert W.
Lehrburger: Bail Hearing as to
Weronika Janczuk held on
3/15/2022. Deft Appears with
Federal Defender Sylvie Levine
and AUSA Edward Robinson for
the government. Detention; See
Transcript (dif)." But the
transcript, needless to say,
is not in PACER. Watch this
site.
Previously:
on the morning of January 27
after several more
communications (and no
response from Janczuk's
counsel) Inner City Press was
alerted that Janczuk had been
arrested again.
After covering two trials
throughout the day (US v.
Avenatti and US v. Dowd) Inner
City Press went to the SDNY
Magistrates Court and, upon
inquiry, was informed that
Janczuk was detained. Later
this was confirmed in the
docket: Detention: Risk of
Flight / Danger.
But which
is it? Both? Inner City Press
held off reporting that beyond
the communication unilaterally
declared off the record,
Janczkuk did an Internet post
about "the journalist," and an
Instagram post implying she
would go to Italy.
From the
post: "A notice of these
charges, as well as the
journalist’s singular
interpretation and context,
were published in a local
press without any comment from
her or the agency, incipient
grounds for slander. We do our
work with the greatest
seriousness, professionalism,
transparency, integrity,
capacity, cleverness, and
more, and our team remains
infinitely well, healthy,
dedicated, and hard-working.
Given a private legal
background of her own, Ms.
Janczuk will litigate these
claims in courts herself, in
accord with constitutional
right, until resolved."
From
Instagram: "in anticipation of
summer, and perhaps a March
spent in Bologna, Italy, a
European country some
frog-jumps over, for a
literary book fair."
Literary,
indeed. Inner City Press has
written more - watch this
site.
Here now
is a written libel threat - we
note that the email address
(the conditions of release are
a single personal and work
email address) and the cc-ing
of the publicly paid Federal
Defender:
"From: Icona
Rysztosik iconarysztosik [at]
gmail [at] com Date: Fri, Jan
14, 2022 at 11:07 AM Subject:
2022.01.14. 11.04am EDT ||
LIBEL
Illegal/Inappropriate
Disclosure of Private Fiscal
Data
To: Inner City Press Cc:
sylvie levine [at] fd [dot]
org>
Dear Mr. Lee, Please
remove the
article from online
scaffolds immediately.
No guilt has been judged such
by the court. One stands
innocent until proven guilty.
No fiscal situation
information was deemed public
information. No permission for
publication was granted by the
defendant. You have
grounds herein for
libel. You have
until the end of the day to
remove this article's content
on the grounds above, and then
I will begin legal measures
where I must. Thank
you. Cheers, Weronika."
What is
said in open court is public.
In fact, fiscal information
has been ordered unsealed upon
Inner City Press requests.
Here, it was never sealed. And
in terms of finances, New York
has anti-SLAPP suit fee
shifting provisions.
Janczuk is
from Canada, where currently
accused pedophile Peter Nygard
has his extradition hearings
shielded in secrecy by a
Canadian law prohibiting
publication of anything but
the outcome. Perhaps that is
one of the factors that
allowed Nygard to abuse his
victims for so long. In any
case, it is not the law in the
US, much less in New York.
Inner City
Press is now publishing the
Complaint in US v. Janczuk,
here. We will have more
on this.
The January
11 detention or remand that
Inner City Press reported took
place after a two hour long
proceeding in the U.S.
District Court for the
Southern District of New York
Magistrates Court.
On January
13 Inner City Press after
being contacted by others in Janczuk's
orbit
belatedly
obtained and
review
the complaint in the case. It
quotes Janczuk's emails to
Victim-1, "a partner who works
for an investment fund located
in New York, New York," and to
his family.
On April 17, 2021
Janczuk wrote to Victim-1,
Subject: Cuntz: You've Made Me
Orgasmic Message: [Victim] I
swear that I will kill you.
She is
subject to an order of
protection in Minnesota,
Dakota County Judge Arlene M.
Perkkio, Dkt 19 HA-CV-20-2141.
She was arrested on June 30,
2021 on Long Island for
violating it.
There
followed a Nassau County
restraining order
CR-009426-21NA, in effect
until June 30, 2022. There's
more - watch this site.
Magistrate Judge Barbara C.
Moses twice summoned Pre-Trial
Services out of the courtroom
to discuss the case off the
record. Pre-Trial Services was
recommending that the
Janczuk be held in detention
pending trial.
Assistant US
Attorney Edward Charles
Robinson described Janczuk as
cyber-stalking a victim he
left unnamed, and the victim's
family members and place of
work, which he described as an
investment firm / law
firm. We can now report
that Victim-1's last name
begins with S.
Only two
days prior to her arrest and
one-night Federal detention,
Janczuk had been tweeting
photos of a Polish restaurant
in Brooklyn. Other of her
accounts have been removed
(for example,
"weronikajanczuk.wordpress.com
is no longer available. The
authors have deleted this
site") but still online is an
article, "Cyber-stalking does
not get you agents and
editors." The allegation did,
however, give rise to this
arrest and detention.
The case is
US v. Janczuk, 21-mj-10886
(Moses / Wang).
***
Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a
month helps keep us going and grants you
access to exclusive bonus material on our
Patreon page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2022 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
|