In Other Media-eg New Statesman, AJE, FP, Georgia, NYT,  Azerbaijan, CSM Click here to contact us     .

By Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon
BBC - Decrypt - LightRead - Honduras - Source

SDNY COURTHOUSE, April 27 -- For money laundering for scam crypto currency OneCoin, lawyer Mark Scott was convicted by a jury after testimony by Konstantin Ignatov and others but was allowed to remain free on bail pending sentencing. Sebastian Greenwood has now been charged, see below.

 In the civil case, which many reported was on the verge of being dismissed, now on April 27 even the defendants agree on the need for a May 1 teleconference, which Inner City Press aims to cover. Today's joint letter, naming a person Inner City Press has reported on but is not in the criminal case Nicole J. Huessmann, says "Though Mr. Scott has been convicted, he retains his Fifth Amendment rights through his post-trial motions, appeal, and sentencing... Defendant Nicole J. Huesmann’s Position: When Defendant Nicole J. Huesmann, was served with the Summons and First Amended Class Action Complaint in this action, the Court had already entered its Stay Order.3 As such, Ms. Huesmann did not participate in the proceedings that  3 The Stay Order was entered on August 23, 2019 (DE 46). Defendant, Huesmann was served on September 9, 2019, and counsel appeared on her behalf on November 1, 2019 (DE 64).  Ms. Huesmann is a Florida Attorney. Defendant Scott was one of her clients. Plaintiffs’ First Amended Class Action Complaint alleges purely state law claims against Ms. Huesmann arising out of her representation of Mr. Scott in connection with some commercial transactions. Ms. Huesmann is not under investigation by the Federal Government, has not been indicted or charged with any crimes, did not testify in any of the criminal proceedings, and has not been involved with, or aware of, the OneCoin defendants or their business or alleged activities. Ms. Huesmann is not the subject of any of the Federal Claims brought against any of the other defendants. This Court lacks personal jurisdiction over Ms. Huesmann. She is not subject to general jurisdiction in New York, because she is domiciled in Florida. She is also not subject to specific jurisdiction in New York because Plaintiff’s state-law claims do not arise out of any activity conducted by Ms. Huesmann in New York and Ms. Huesmann also did not purposefully avail herself of the privileges of conducting activities in New York. E.g. Lipin v. Hunt, 538 F. Supp. 2d 590, 598 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) (finding no specific jurisdiction when “[a]ll of Plaintiff’s allegations relating to actions taken by [defendant] in his capacity as a[n] attorney relate to actions taken in connection with proceedings in Maine courts.”); BHC Interim Funding, LP v. Bracewell & Patterson, LLP, No. 02 Civ. 4695, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10739 at *12, 2003 WL 21467544 S.D.N.Y. June 25, 2003) (“Plaintiff has neither alleged nor offered evidence that [defendant law firm] has made specific efforts to make itself known in the New York legal market, or to establish a client base here.”). Notably absent from the First Amended Class Action Complaint are any allegations that Ms. Huesmann conducted any activity within or targeted at New York that arises out of Plaintiff’s claims. When permitted by this Court, Ms. Huesmann intends to move for dismissal of all claims brought against her, for, among other reasons, lack of personal jurisdiction. In order to avoid any argument that she has submitted to the jurisdiction of this Court, or somehow waived her right to challenge personal jurisdiction, Ms. Huesmann takes no position on the status of the stay. Should the Court, in its discretion, decide to lift the stay, Ms. Huesmann requests that the Court establish a shorter briefing schedule for pre-answer motions, consistent with the Local Rules, rather than the schedule proposed by the Plaintiff. Defendant Konstantin Ignatov’s Position: Defendant Konstantin Ignatov does not object to the continued stay of the proceedings requested by his co-defendants. All Defendants agree that the May 1, 2020 telephonic conference should go forward. For the foregoing reasons, and to expediently resolve the issues raised herein, the Appearing Parties respectfully request that the Court proceed with the telephonic conference tentatively scheduled for May 1, 2020." The case is Grablis v. OneCoin Ltd. et al.,19-cv-4074 (Caproni).

  On April 25 Inner City Press reported based on Florida sources and files that Scott has shifted from CCC Natural Ventures MA Holdings, LLC, with Nicole J. Huessmann to Venoma Group LLP, with Larysa Kavaleva and Lidia V. Scott (Kolesnikova). David Pike, also indicted, is off. Inner City Press will have more on this.

 On April 6 the US Attorney's Office has asked to push back the sentencing control date for Konstantin Ignatov, saying that "his cooperation is not yet complete." Inner City Press that same day in writing asked, is that Sebastian Greenwood?

 And now on April 10, just made public, this letter from the US Attorney's Office: "Re: United States v. Karl Sebastian Greenwood, S5 17 Cr. 630 (ER) Dear Judge Ramos: The Government submits this letter to respectfully request an adjournment of the pretrial conference scheduled in the above-captioned case on April 3, 2020 at 11:30 a.m. The Government recently provided additional discovery materials to the defendant. Counsel for the defendant, Anthony Strazza, Esq., has indicated that the defendant requires additional time to review those materials and to engage in any appropriate discussions with the Government regarding a potential resolution of this matter. Accordingly, the parties jointly request an adjournment of approximately 60 days."

  To which Judge Ramos ruled on April 6, but withheld from the docket until April 10: "The April 3 pretrial conference is hereby adjourned to June 3, 2020, at 10:00 AM. Speedy trial time is excluded from today, April 3, 2020, to June 3, 2020, in the interest of justice. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to unseal the S5 Indictment, S5 17-cr-630 (ER). SO ORDERED. 4/6/2020." More on Patreon here.

 Inner City Press will remain on this. From the Konstantin Ignatov letter: "United States v. Konstantin Ignatov, S7 17 Cr. 630 (ER) Dear Judge Ramos: A sentencing control date is presently set in the above-captioned case for April 8, 2020 at 11:00 a.m. Because the defendant’s cooperation is not yet complete, the Government respectfully requests that the sentencing date be adjourned for approximately three months."

  And now on April 7, Judge Ramos has set Konstantin Ignatov's sentencing for July 8, 2020 at 10 am, photo here. Inner City Press will be there.

  Inner City Press which covered the trial including Konstantin Ignatov's testimony then on December 6, 2019 reported from its South Florida sources that despite ostensibly being on home incarceration Scott was "living the high life in Florida including being spotted out to dinner with body guards... Meanwhile Gilbert Armenta, fellow money launderer, is out and registering even more companies, the same as he did for his OneCoin money laundering bank in Georgia" - the country, not the US state. 

  On March 30 Mark Scott, after being briefing detained, was released on bond again security by his Coral Gables apartment; under a now standard condition he is required to get an iPhone for remove supervision.

 And on March 13, Konstantin Ignatov was released from Federal prison. Photo here. Notable is that even his sentencing proceeding was not announced on PACER, unlike other cooperators who get time served, such as on March 13 cooperator Ceruti, Inner City Press story here.

  So who decides which cooperators' sentencings are announced, and which are hidden? Rapper Tekashi #6ix9ine / Daniel Hernandez' sentencing before SDNY Judge Paul A. Engelmayer was announced, and Inner City Press live tweeted it. Konstantin Ignatov's happened in secret. Who does this benefit? And why does the US Attorney's Office Press Office not answer basic questions, or provide exhibits even when ordered (albeit orally) by a Judge, here Judge Engelmayer? We'll have more on this.

 In a parallel world on March 12 the US Attorney's Office belatedly moved to revoke Scott's bail, citing Scott's continue use of OneCoin derived funds and, explicitly, Inner City Press' "blog post" about Scott dining out in Florida while on home incarceration. 

 Assistant US Attorney Chris Demase said they have first read out it in the blog post and couldn't believe it - but that it was proved by GPS information from Scott's location monitoring ankle bracelet.  

  Mark Scott's Florida based lawyer David M. Garvin sputtered over the telephone from Florida, with Scott next to him, that the dinner had involved lawyers. He tried to explain Scott's use of OneCoin funds. But Scott was ordered to turn himself in to the US Bureau of Prisons on March 13. And on that day, Konstantin Ignatov was released. Strange symmetry.

Another of his lawyers, when Inner City Press left the courtroom, was arranging to pay for a transcript, perhaps to appeal. Inner City Press on March 13 asked the US Attorney's Office Press Office for its filings not yet in the public docket.  Here is Inner City Press' Periscope video upon leaving the courthouse. The case is US v. Scott, 17-cr-630 (Ramos). 

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA

Mail: Box 20047, Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540

Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2020 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com for