In Other Media-eg New Statesman, AJE, FP, Georgia, NYT,  Azerbaijan, CSM Click here to contact us     .

By Matthew Russell Lee, Pod Exclusive Patreon
BBC - Guardian UK - Honduras - The Source

SDNY COURTHOUSE, Sept 14 – Virgil Griffith, charged with violating North Korea sanctions in connection with a crypto-currency conference there, faced a bail review proceeding - in person - on July 20. He lost and was remanded. Inner City Press was there, and live tweeted, here and below (podcast here)

 On September 14, in the run up to the trial scheduled to start on September 27, there was a final pre-trial conference replete with rulings. Inner City Press live tweeted it here:

Judge Castel: The Grand Jury indicted him for participation in a conspiracy to violate IIEPA sanctions on North Korea, by providing services to the DPRK and evade requirements of US law in connection therewith. But the US want to get info in outside the time frame

Judge Castel: The US wants to get into evidence an email about openness to supporting the Ethereum Foundation. I'm going to have to reserve on that, and decide when it comes up. Griffith's statements would come in as party statements, and CC-5 for context

Judge Castel: The email says South Korea seems to be allowed to violate the sanctions... That comes in as a party statement. CC-5 replies, That's sensitive. I don't think that comes in. CC-5 has not been shown to be part of the conspiracy.

Judge Castel: Also Griffith's emails to a DPRK account about attending the conference, that comes in, subject to connection, subject to being stricken if the declarant was not a member of the conspiracy.

Judge Castel: Griffith's statements at the conference are direct proof of the conspiracy [Note: this is a rule that the statements come into evidence, not an indication of Judge Castel's view of the merits, which will be up to the jury in any event]

Judge Castel: Similarly Griffith's statements to law enforcement, they are party statement. The May exchange about 'you should get your taxes in order' normally would not come in, but for his response indicating consciousness of guilty...

 Judge Castel: The statement about forgetting to file taxes in 2015 and 2018 is excluded, the probative value is outweighed by potential prejudice. That's where I am. I have some sympathy for the defense saying they don't know the full context. I could be persuaded

Judge Castel: What about NorthKorea's crypto currency capabilities? Griffith's lawyer: This trial is about the block chain in #NorthKorea. We want to show that DPRK had tremendous capability before Mr. Griffith visited

 Judge Castel: Here's a hypothetical. Country A is subject to these sanctions. A technician there downloads a manual on how to repair a Dell laptop. 20 technicians learn out to do it. Thereafter a US citizen goes there to fix one - and that's still services

Griffith's lawyer: My client did not go to #NorthKorea and fix anything, physically. And the information he provided was publicly available.  Judge Castel: I'm not deciding that at this time.

AUSA: We want to have an expert testify about Juche. Judge Castel: That seems allowable, I'm probably mis-pronouncing it, JuJu. AUSA: We are all working on pronouncing it.  [Note: North
Korea's Juche was improvised in the 1950s]

Judge Castel: Griffith's statement, I'll try to become wealthy enough to pay my bail *is* relevant, I'm not going to exclude it. On TOR and the Dark Web, the government is not going to be permitted to wander there but some specifics, on his c.v., yes

 Judge Castel: Griffith wrote an Ethereum colleague he would not work on a DPRK node because if he did the President would get a memo that Ethereum was helping #NorthKorea nukes. AUSA: But he went ahead and tried to get someone else to do it, using GoFundMe

 Judge Castel: I'm going to exclude CC-3 sending Griffith a newspaper article about avoiding travel to North Korea due to the sixth nuclear test - it's prejudicial. Griffith's lawyer: Using the term nuclear would be like dropping a nuclear bomb in this courtroom

Judge Castel: If there's been misconduct, it could result in acquittal if he's convicted. If the prosecution did not access the material [on Palantir], I'm prepared to go forward with the trial.

Griffith's lawyer: We're also asking to suppress all the evidence that was put on Palantir -- Judge Castel: If you persuade me it's outrageous, I supposed I could jump to dismissing the indictment.  Griffith's lawyer: We don't have to show outrageous conduct.

 Virgil Griffith proceeding winds up with questions on how to get phones in, clothes while in jail, and attendance by his family, who would travel up from Alabama.

Inner City Press will cover the trial

  On September 13, an order was docketed that has the potential to link Griffith's case to the type of prosecutorial actions criticized - and leaving to vacatur of conviction - in the US v. Nejad case: "ORDER as to Virgil Griffith: In connection with defendant's motion to dismiss emailed to the Court at 11:42 p.m. on Friday, September 10, 2021 the government is ORDERED as follows: 1. By September 17, 2021, file declarations from each member of the prosecution team, including AUSAs and agents, stating whether from after September 14, 2020 to the present the individual conducted or directed another to conduct a search of material deemed to be not pertinent to the search warrant and further whether the individual has knowledge of any other member of the prosecution team having done so. 2. By the close of business on September 13, 2021, provide the Court with copies of the initial report and any follow-up report made to Judge Nathan as directed in the Opinion & Order of February 22, 2021 in United States v Nejad, 18 cr 224 (AN). 3. By the close of business on September 13, 2021, set forth why the Court ought not order the government to produce the three categories of information and documents sought by the defense on pages 20-21 of its memorandum of law. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 9/12/2021)." Watch this site.

On September 2 a sealed letter and proposed order, with account numbers and and monetary balances, was filed - but not available to the press or public. On September 3 Judge Castel ruled: "ORDER as to Virgil Griffith: The application to seal the letter of September 2, 2021, together with the proposed order, is granted in part and denied in part. The letter and proposed order are sealed but redacted versions of the letter and proposed order shall be filed forthwith by defendant on the public docket, redacting only unique identifiers and/or account numbers, date of birth and the believed balance in the account. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 9/3/2021)."

Now a redacted letter by Griffith's lawyer, for permission to get paid from Griffith's Coinbase account.The US Attorney's Office is opposed.

Late on August 27 Griffith's lawyers filed his motions to limine, seeking to exclude evidence at trial including about his "purported personal wealth and cryptocurrency holdings.. involvement with Tor / 'Dark Web'... DPRK's nuclear program and any implication that Mr. Griffith was involved in said program." Watch this site.

On August 24 the US Attorney's Office acknowledged that at least four FBI agents not on the case accessed the search warrant returns from Griffith's accounts:

"(1) On May 4, 2020, a now-retired FBI agent conducted a search on the Platform and then,  based on the returns from that search, viewed at least some portion of the Search  Warrant Returns. 

(2) On April 6, 2021, and April 19, 2021, an FBI analyst ran three searches on the Platform and viewed at least some portion of the Search Warrant Returns. 

(3) On May 27, 2021, an FBI analyst conducted a search on the Platform and, as a result  of that search, viewed at least some portion of the Search Warrant Returns.

(4) As described above, on August 11, 2021, an FBI analyst conducted a search in the  Platform and viewed at least some portion of the Search Warrant Returns. She shared those results with, among others, an FBI agent also not on the prosecution team, who  emailed them to the FBI case agent." Full letter on Inner City Press' DocumentCloud here.

On August 13, the US Attorney's Office filed its motions in limine, including that Griffith "forwarded CC-4's email to the co-founder of the Ethereum Foundation and Griffith's ultimate boss ('Individual-1') and another Ethereum Foundation leader." The US wants to use these individuals, and communications, against Griffith at trial. Watch this site.

From July 20: Judge Castel has entered: All rise. Two prosecutors, 1 pre-trial services officer. Griffith and 2 lawyers.

AUSA: The defendant tried to access his crypto accounts, using a 3d party, evading computer monitoring condition.

 AUSA: His mother impersonated him. The defense counsel's involvement does not mitigate the risk of flight. "He's a millionaire with ties abroad."

 Judge Castel: How much time might he face? AUSA: 20 years. Judge Castel: Were the funds frozen? AUSA: Coinbase said they would not release them... He was thrown out of hotel in LA, after bragging about North Korea and crypto, he told staff, Read about me.

 AUSA: The defendant has violated his bail conditions. Judge Castel: Mr Klein?

Ms Axel: It's a misunderstanding. He's only banned from cold wallets. His father is here. [True: here in courtroom gallery with Inmer City Press]

 Judge Castel hands out law of 2d Circuit on advice of counsel as a defense.  [Note: There are no US Marshals in the courtroom now.]

Ms Axel seems to acknowledge that Mrs Griffith made it appear to Coinbase that she was her son. Judge Castel: Did he email Coinbase? Seems so.  Judge Castel reads Judge Broderick's Jan 2, 2020 bond order. Axel: You modified it. Judge Castel: So it's my fault...

Axel cites Docket 92, allowing emails with non attorneys. Judge Castel: The no-crypto provision was not modified. You have a problem here, Ms. Axel.

Judge Castel: His mother's Internet use was on hid behalf, and in his name. Axel: His father put Virgil's name in his phone to get in today. Judge Castel: Is Ethereum paying for any of his defense? Klein: Not in public. [Sidebar with white noise]

Klein comes into gallery and whispers with Virgil's father, returns to sidebar with Judge Castel and prosecutors.

 Axel: We spoke with pre-trial services officer Carl in Alabama... Virgil's parents are upstanding members of the Tuscaloosa community. Judge Castel: Pre-Trial works for the Court. Inner City Press @innercitypress · 54m Two US Marshals have come into the courtroom. One goes forward and sits directly behind Griffith. Axel is still talking.

Judge Castel: Last word to the government. AUSA: They knew accessing crypto currency accounts was forbidden. These are just post hoc justifications.

AUSA: He's told No, then tries to circumvent. He's an expert in the Dark Web, and searching it. On Aug 7, 2019 he said, The Americans let you get away with it once.

Judge Castel: I don't have to find a violation. This is a bail review. Axel: Dissidents use the Dark Web. He has PhD, he could do this. Doctor Evil does this with a burner from Starbucks, not through his mother.

Judge Castel: He's charged in a single IEEPA count. Trial is near. The circumstances have changed. Ether has gone up by ten times. It changes the calculus. Bond Paragraph 14 was violated.

 Judge Castel: My concern is risk of flight. The defendant is remanded.

He is awaiting trial in September 2021 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

On July 9 the US Attorney's Office wrote to SDNY Judge P. Kevin Castel saying Griffith attempted to access one of his frozen cryptocurrency accounts containing assets of nearly $1 million. They went a hearing, and they want him remanded (jailed). Full letter on Patreon here.

On July 13, this: "MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Virgil Griffith on re: [119] LETTER MOTION filed by USA addressed to Judge P. Kevin Castel from AUSAs Kimberly Ravener and Kyle Wirshba dated July 9, 2021 re: Violation of Bail Conditions. ENDORSEMENT: A bail review proceeding will be held on July 20, 2021 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 11D. The defendant shall appear in person."

On July 16, Griffith's lawyers argued that his parents accessed Coinbase, given the run up in ETH price, to pay for counsel: "Given the impending trial date, Mr. Griffith may need to sell certain assets to fund his legal  defense. Mr. Griffith consults closely with his family on financial matters and did so even prior  to his arrest. In connection with their strategy to assess and access necessary resources to fund  his defense, and after consulting counsel, his mother made an online request to access a U.S.- based and regulated cryptocurrency exchange, Coinbase... As the Court knows, Mr. Griffith was an employee of the Ethereum Foundation and was paid in  Ether (ETH), a digital asset used on the Ethereum blockchain.  At the time Mr. Griffith was  arrested in November 2019, he held some ETH and some ETC (a related cryptocurrency) in a Coinbase account worth less than $100,000. Since then, one ETH has risen from about $150 to about $1,900. The government states that the account assets are currently worth almost $1  million. Neither Mr. Griffith nor any family member acting on his behalf has had access to that account since his arrest.  With the September trial date quickly approaching, and given ETH’s current value, Mr. Griffith  has wished to know the exact contents of his Coinbase account and the value of his assets, so he  could consider transferring or selling all of part of his cryptocurrency held there to pay trialrelated expenses. As is their family culture, Mr. Griffith’s father, Dr. Robert Griffith, has been  involved and consulted in matters regarding assets and plans to pay defense counsel." Full letter on Patreon here.

  Griffith's lawyer have said the prosecutors tried to mislead Judge Castel by omitting from their quote of email to Coinbase the line that the company could contact Griffith's lawyer; they say this shows no risk of flight.

 On February 11, Judge Castel held a proceeding about who knew what before and at the conference Griffith spoke at. A stipulation or agreement has been proposed, essentially that some people know, but the DPRK / Kim government as such did not. Inner City Press live tweeted the first proceeding, here.

 And on February 23 the second proceeding, in two parts, here.

The case is US v. Griffith, 20-cr-15 (Castel). 

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA

Mail: Box 20047, Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540

Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2020 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com