SDNY COURTHOUSE,
Jan 30 – Michael Avenatti's
financial affidavit to get a
publicly paid lawyer for his
Stormy Daniels case, which
Inner City Press formally
sought to have unsealed for
eleven months, were on July
27, 2021 ordered unsealed. Order.
Podcast here.
Aug 13 podcast here.
On the
weekend before trial there's
was a request to delay it, on
COVID policy and
Constitutional grounds. It was
denied.
The trial
started on the morning of
January 24. Inner City Press
live tweet here.
It continued in the afternoon,
with Stormy Daniels' literary
agency Lucas Janklow being
cross examined about being
introduced to Michael Avenatti
at a hotel bar, by Anderson
Cooper. Inner City Press live
tweeted, thread here;
stream here,
video here
On Saturday
July 29 Judge Jesse M. Furman
docketed an order criticizing
Avenatti for not providing the
list of his witnesses and
ordering that it be done by 10
pm Saturday: "ORDER as to
Michael Avenatti: As discussed
on the record yesterday, Mr.
Avenatti was required, no
later than 5:00 p.m.
yesterday, to disclose to the
Court and the Government the
witnesses that he intends to
call on Monday. He does not
appear to have done so. To
facilitate the timely
litigation of any motions by
the Government to preclude,
Mr. Avenatti shall disclose to
the Court and the Government a
*complete* list of *all*
witnesses he proposes to call
as part of a defense case no
later than 10 p.m. TONIGHT. SO
ORDERED. (Signed by Judge
Jesse M. Furman on 1/29/2022)
(Text Only Order)(Furman,
Jesse)."
Avenatti
wrote in by the deadline,
saying a list had been
provided to the US Attorney's
Office but not the court. The
list is: "Witness List: 1.
John Dean Barrale 2. Carlos
Colorado 3. Glendon Crain 4.
John Drum 5. Jason Fischer 6.
Luke Janklow 7. David Karbley
8. Justin Loupe 9. Richard
Marshack 10.Denver Nicks Mr.
Avenatti reserves the right to
testify."
Soon
after, the US Attorney's Office filed seeking to preclude at least
three: " The defendant
intends to call Justin
Loupe, David Karbley,
and Jason Fischer at
trial on Monday. The
Government expects
that Mr. Loupe would
offer further
testimony about Ms.
Daniels’s beliefs in
the paranormal, Mr.
Karbley would describe
an unrelated dispute
with Ms. Daniels, and
Mr. Fischer would
provide the foundation
for introduction of an
irrelevant text
exchange between the
defendant and Sean
Macias. Each of these
witnesses should be
precluded from
testifying at trial."
Early on Sunday,
January 30, Judge Furman
issued an order listing six
witness who who not testify
Monday, if ever: "ORDER as to
Michael Avenatti: In light of
the Court's Orders at ECF Nos.
323 and 324, and the related
pending motions, Mr. Avenatti
should be prepared to call
witnesses other than Mr.
Barrale, Mr. Colorado, Mr.
Janklow, Mr. Fischer, Mr.
Karbley, and Mr. Loupe to
testify on Monday, January 31,
2022. Accordingly, Mr.
Colorado need not travel to
New York City on January 30,
2022. SO ORDERED. (Signed by
Judge Jesse M. Furman on
1/30/2022)."
Later on
Sunday, January 30 the US
Attorney's Office put in a
letter seeking to preclude in
advance Avenatti, if it takes
the stand, from testifying
about the possible motives of
the prosecution. The US wrote:
"the defendant—should he
testify—should be precluded
from offering any
commentary or other testimony
regarding the Government’s
motivation or
decision-making
regarding the bringing of
charges against the defendant,
the Government’s selection
of investigative steps,
or discovery-related matters
(in this case, the prior case
in which the defendant
was convicted, or the pending
case in the Central District
of California). The defendant
has repeatedly attempted
to put these matters before
the jury through improper
questioning of
witnesses, and the defendant’s
claims and insinuations on
these topics are both without
any factual basis and
entirely irrelevant and
improper under the Rules of
Evidence, as the Court has
previously explained. A.
Background As the Court is
aware, the defendant was
previously convicted of
extortion and honest
services fraud in United
States v. Avenatti, No. 19 Cr.
373 (PGG). The evidence
admitted at that trial
proved beyond a reasonable
doubt that the defendant
wrongfully used
confidential information
obtained from a client in a
failed effort to extort NIKE,
Inc." Full letter on Inner
City Press' DocumentCloud here.
After getting an
extension from 5 pm to 7 pm on
Sunday, January 30, Avenatti
at deadline argued that
"Defendant should be permitted
to call each of the five
witnesses as scheduled and
mount his defense. Based on
the following, defendant
respectfully requests that the
Court deny Carlos Colorado and
John Barrale’s Motions to
Quash. Further,
defendant respectfully
requests that the Court deny
the Government’s motion
to preclude the
testimony of the three other
defense witnesses. 5 1
If the Court precludes all six
witnesses, five of whom were
on defendant’s witness list
for Monday, it is likely
that the defendant will not be
able to proceed with any other
witnesses until Tuesday.
2 Mr. Colorado, a licensed
attorney, was finally served
with a subpoena on January 26,
2022 after evading
service since January 19.
Defendant will have a
paralegal present in Court on
Monday, January 31, to
testify, if necessary, as to
the efforts to serve Mr.
Colorado and his
repeated attempts at
evading service. 3 Until very
recently, Mr. Barrale was
cooperating with the defense
(advisory counsel) and
discussing the means by which
he could testify. 4 Each
motion to quash has not been
docketed at the time of this
filing. 5 Defendant is
willing to permit Mr. Barrale
to testify via video in light
of his recent diagnosis." Full
letter on Inner City Press'
DocumentCloud here.
On January 25,
the cross examination of
Janklow continued, then an
SDNY Special Agent and
Avenatti law firm staffer. But
in the middle, Federal
Defenders said Avenatti may
want to fire them and
represent himself. Judge
Furman said, Not so fast.
Inner City Press live tweeted
it, thread here
In the
afternoon of January 25,
Avenatti confirmed he wants to
represent himself and Judge
Furman granted it. He will
cross examine Stormy Daniels,
then. Inner City Press live
tweeted it, thread here
and below.
On the morning of
January 26, podcast here,
Avenatti cross examined
Regnier than an FBI agent.
Inner City Press live tweeted,
thread here.
On the
afternoon of January 26
Avenatti cross examined Sean
Macias who hooked him up with
Garagos, before those two
double teamed Nike. Inner City
Press live tweeted it, thread
here.
On the
morning of January 27, after
the end of Macias and another
SDNY witness, Stormy Daniels
took the stand to begin direct
examination. Inner City Press
live tweeted it here.
On the
afternoon, at the end,
Avenatti began his cross
examination. Inner City Press
live tweeted the afternoon, here.
On January 29,
Avenatti's cross examination
continued, to two videos,
thread here.
In the afternoon
Avenatti got into, or tried to
get into, Trump; afterward
Inner City Press asked
him about the case - and
the Supreme Court. Thread here.
Judge
Furman released his juror
questions, asking each side to
respond by January 19 at 10
am. The questions include:
"Based on anything that you
have read, seen, or heard
about Mr. Avenatti, have
you formed any opinions
about Mr. Avenatti that might
make it difficult for you to
be a fair and impartial
juror in this case? 10.
Would you have any trouble
following my instructions to
put anything you may
have read, seen, or
heard about Mr. Avenatti out
of your mind and decide this
case based only on the
evidence presented at
trial? 11. Do you or
does any member of your family
or a close friend personally
know or have past or
present dealings with the
alleged victim in this case,
Ms. Clifford (also known
as “Stormy Daniels”), or
with any of her family
members?...
"Do you know or
have you heard of any of the
following people or entities,
which include the
lawyers in this case, people
who may testify at the trial,
and other names that may
be mentioned during the
course of the trial? •
Pamela Baez • Elizabeth Beier
• Thomas Bolus • Clark
Brewster • Christine Carlin •
Michaela Catando (also known
as Kayla Paige) • Dmitri
Chitov • Dwayne Crawford •
Jennifer Donovan • Anna Finkel
• Mark Geragos • Jack
Guiragosian • Holtzbrinck
Publishers • Luke Janklow •
Janklow & Nesbit
Associates • Geoffrey Johnson
• Global Baristas • Sean
Macias • Macmillan Publishers
• Susan McClaran • Benjamin
Meiselas • Travis Miller •
Mareli Miniutti • Erik Nathan
• Denver Nicks • Kevin Carr
O’Leary • David Padilla •
Brandon Parraway • Pro Tech
Security and Automation • Judy
Regnier • Sally Richardson •
Security and Automation LLC •
St. Martin’s Press • Enrique
Santos • Jessica Volchko •
Juliet Vicari • Donald Vilfer
25. Are you familiar with
anyone else present in the
courtroom, including your
fellow jurors, all Court
personnel, and myself?"
On October 14
Judge Furman held a proceeding
in the Stormy Daniels case and
Inner City Press live tweeted
it here
and podcast here
On August 10
Avenatti's Federal Defenders
filed a copy of the affidavit
with multiple redactions. The
form refers on nearly every
question to an attachment,
which is blacked out in absurd
ways. It reads, for example,
"I own stock in two closely
held companies that may have
value: (a) [REDACTED] located
in [REDACTED]
and (b) [REDACTED]
located in [REDACTED]...
I technically
still have an
interest in a
private
aircraft
(model:
HondaJet 420)
that was
seized by the
IRS and is
still in their
possession.
This interest
is held
through a
single-purpose
entity named [REDACTED],"
and so forth.
Inner
City
Press
published the
redacted
affidavit on
its
DocumentCloud
here
and asked,
Will the Court
be accepting
this?
On
August 11, the
correct answer
was: No. "MEMO
ENDORSEMENT as
to Michael
Avenatti (1)
on [139]
LETTER MOTION
re: [139]
LETTER MOTION
addressed to
Judge Jesse M.
Furman from
Robert Baum,
Tamara Giwa
& Andrew
Dalack dated
August 10,
2021 re:
Letter Motion
In Response to
Court's Order
to File
Financial
Affidavit.
ENDORSEMENT:
The Court is
unpersuaded
that privacy
interests
justify
redacting the
names and
locations of
the corporate
entities in
Paragraphs 14,
15, and 17 of
ECF No.
139-1."
After hours on
August 12,
some
redactions
were removed:
Avenatti's owned
a plane
through
Passport 420
LLC; an
unnamed
"non-family-member
acquaintance"
paid a
NY-based
attorney in
the Nike case,
whose name is
redacted.
Unredacted:
Avenatti owns
stock in
Tyrian Systems
(aka Seek
Thermal) of
Santa Barbara,
CA and
Centurion
Holdings I,
LLC of St.
Louis
Missouri."
Not
so fast. Inner
City Press
research in
the hours
after the
removal of the
improper
redactions found
that Centurion
Holdings I,
LLC is based
in Arnold,
Missouri - and
"received a
PPP loan of
$60,477 in
May, 2020."
That's the
Paycheck
Protection
Program; the
funds came
through the
Central Bank
of St. Louis.
Bigger,
the aka: "Seek
Thermal, Inc
of 6300
Hollister Ave
in Goleta,
California received
a
Coronavirus-related
PPP loan from
the SBA of
$1,365,062.00
in April,
2020." We'll
have more on
this.
Watch
this site.
On August
27, Inner City Press filed a
formal request that documents
in the case not be sealed,
full filing on Patreon here.
On
November 12, Inner City Press
made a third filing with Judge
Furman, on a decision
to unseal issued earlier in
the day by SDNY Judge J. Paul
Oetken after Inner City Press
filed to similarly unseal Lev
Parnas' co-defendant David
Correia's financial infor: "we
again ask, why should lower
income and less high profile
defendants in the SDNY -- and
now David Correia -- have
their financial information so
disclosed while Avenatti's
information is sealed in its
entirety? The documents at
issue should not be sealed and
should be made available."
On August
28, 2020 Judge Furman entered
an order: "The Court received
the attached communication
from Matthew Lee of Inner City
Press “seeking leave to be
heard and for the unsealing of
the CJA Form 23, affidavit,
and all associated documents”
relating to this litigation.
To the extent that Mr. Lee
(who is admitted to the bar of
the Southern District of New
York) seeks leave to be heard,
his application is GRANTED.
The Court reserves judgment on
the question of whether
Defendant’s CJA Form 23 and
related documents should be
unsealed. SO ORDERED. Dated:
August 28, 2020 New York, New
York JESSE M. FURMAN." Docket
No. 85, on Inner City Press'
DocumentCloud, here.
On July
27, 2021, Judge Furman four
times citing Inner City Press
ordered
Avenatti's affidavits
unsealed: "Avenatti filed a
letter brief arguing that the
Initial Financial Affidavit
should remain under seal. ECF
No. 80 (“Def.’s Mem.”).
Thereafter, the Court received
submissions from Inner City
Press, a media outlet that
intervened to seek disclosure
of the Financial Affidavits,
ECF Nos. 85, 90, 99... The
Defendant initially argued
that the Government lacked
standing “to assert any right
on behalf of the public to
access Mr. Avenatti’s sworn
financial statements.” Def.’s
Mem. 7 n.1 (citing United
States v. Hickey, 185 F.3d
1064 (9th Cir. 1999)).
Subsequently, however, the
Court granted leave to Inner
City Press to be heard on the
Defendant’s motion, ECF No.
85, which indisputably does
have standing to assert such
rights." Full order here,
filings due August 10. Watch
this site.
This case is US v. Avenatti, 19-cr-374
(Furman).
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2020 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
,
